tidytlg
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
Comparison · Analytics
r2rtf vs xplainfi
A side-by-side editorial comparison of r2rtf and xplainfi — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
r2rtf vs xplainfi: at a glance
What is r2rtf?
The clinical-report table engine learned Chinese, then learned to leave RTF entirely
r2rtf builds the RTF tables, listings and figures that go into clinical study reports, and its recent releases have been about widening who and what it can serve rather than changing how tables are composed. The 1.2.0 release added internationalization — a SimSun font path for Chinese characters plus hyphenation control — and 1.3.0 followed with write_docx() and write_html(), turning the LibreOffice conversion the package had documented into exported functions.
What is xplainfi?
xplainfi treats feature importance as an estimate with error bars, not a number.
xplainfi implements feature importance methods for mlr3 — perturbation-based PFI, CFI and RFI, refit-based LOCO and WVIM, and SAGE. Its defining choice is that importance scores come with inference attached: several confidence-interval methods, including the Nadeau-Bengio correction and a distribution-free option added in 1.1.0. It declared itself released at 1.0.0 in January 2026.
r2rtf vs xplainfi: editorial side-by-side
r2rtf
0.0ANALYTICS
The clinical-report table engine learned Chinese, then learned to leave RTF entirely
◆ Current state
r2rtf builds the RTF tables, listings and figures that go into clinical study reports, and its recent releases have been about widening who and what it can serve rather than changing how tables are composed. The 1.2.0 release added internationalization — a SimSun font path for Chinese characters plus hyphenation control — and 1.3.0 followed with write_docx() and write_html(), turning the LibreOffice conversion the package had documented into exported functions.
◆ Where it's heading
Two threads run through the window. One is output reach: RTF remains the composition target, but the artifacts that come out of it now include DOCX and HTML, and page numbering can be made table-relative across multi-page tables. The other is durability under a moving R and font stack — the ANSI/Unicode converter was rebuilt, the LaTeX mapping table generated from code rather than shipped as sysdata, unlist() usage fixed for R 4.5, and graphics-device leaks that produced stray Rplots.pdf closed off.
◆ Prediction
Having exported DOCX and HTML conversion, the likely next step is filling in what those formats lose relative to RTF — pagination and footnote fidelity are the obvious gaps. The i18n path currently covers Chinese only, so additional font families are the other plausible direction.
xplainfi
2.5ANALYTICS
xplainfi treats feature importance as an estimate with error bars, not a number.
◆ Current state
xplainfi implements feature importance methods for mlr3 — perturbation-based PFI, CFI and RFI, refit-based LOCO and WVIM, and SAGE. Its defining choice is that importance scores come with inference attached: several confidence-interval methods, including the Nadeau-Bengio correction and a distribution-free option added in 1.1.0. It declared itself released at 1.0.0 in January 2026.
◆ Where it's heading
Two lines of work run in parallel. The statistical side keeps adding inference options — variance corrections, conditional predictive impact, and the Lei et al. observation-wise loss-difference test — while the computational side attacks the cost of refit-based methods, most recently with a batch_size argument that parallelises refits and a default of one refit per resampling iteration. Support for pre-trained learners in 1.1.0 removes the refit requirement entirely in some workflows.
◆ Prediction
The stated reasoning that budget is better spent on resampling iterations than repeated refits suggests n_repeats may be removed from WVIM and LOCO outright, as the release notes hint.
Alternatives to r2rtf and xplainfi
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either r2rtf or xplainfi.
Tplyr
Tplyr made clinical summary tables explain where every number came from.
rlistings
Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.
hoardr
A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.
gigs
gigs redesigned its whole conversion API for rOpenSci, then spent three releases getting the docs to build.
riem
A weather-data client that keeps rewriting its HTTP layer while slowly tightening its API.
See all r2rtf alternatives → · See all xplainfi alternatives →
Recent activity from r2rtf and xplainfi
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 21d agoxplainfiRefits parallelise; repeated refits deprioritised in favour of resampling
- 5mo agoxplainfiPre-trained learners supported; distribution-free inference added
- 6mo agoxplainfiVersion bumped to mark the package as released
- 7mo agor2rtfDOCX and HTML output become exported functions
- 9mo agoxplainfiConfidence intervals arrive for feature importance scores
- 11mo agor2rtfChinese character support arrives via an i18n font path ⚡
- 1y agor2rtfText colour fixed for figures encoded into RTF
- 1y agor2rtfFootnote handling fixed for R 4.5.0
- 1y agor2rtfUnicode converter rebuilt and mapping table made inspectable
- 2y agor2rtfUTF-8 conversion fix and LibreOffice 7.6 support
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between r2rtf and xplainfi?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. xplainfi is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is r2rtf better than xplainfi?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. xplainfi is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to r2rtf?
Top r2rtf alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "r2rtf alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/r2rtf for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to xplainfi?
Top xplainfi alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "xplainfi alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/xplainfi for the full list with editorial commentary on each.