← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

r2rtf vs simtrial

A side-by-side editorial comparison of r2rtf and simtrial — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:pharmaverse

r2rtf vs simtrial: at a glance

Featurer2rtfsimtrial
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesclinical-reporting, rtf, internationalization, document-conversionclinical-trials, group-sequential, survival-analysis, simulation
Last editorial update1h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is r2rtf?

The clinical-report table engine learned Chinese, then learned to leave RTF entirely

r2rtf builds the RTF tables, listings and figures that go into clinical study reports, and its recent releases have been about widening who and what it can serve rather than changing how tables are composed. The 1.2.0 release added internationalization — a SimSun font path for Chinese characters plus hyphenation control — and 1.3.0 followed with write_docx() and write_html(), turning the LibreOffice conversion the package had documented into exported functions.

Read the full r2rtf trajectory →

What is simtrial?

A fixed-design trial simulator grew a pluggable test framework, then spent a year proving the numbers

simtrial simulates time-to-event clinical trials and applies the tests used to analyse them — logrank, weighted logrank, MaxCombo, RMST, milestone. The 0.4.0 release turned it from a fixed-sample simulator into a group sequential one and standardised every test behind a common output contract, and the releases since have been about making that machinery correct and fast enough to run at scale. Version 1.0.0 arrived in June 2025 with the API settled and three vignettes explaining both the one-call and build-it-yourself paths.

Read the full simtrial trajectory →

r2rtf vs simtrial: editorial side-by-side

R
r2rtf
ANALYTICS
0.0

The clinical-report table engine learned Chinese, then learned to leave RTF entirely

◆ Current state

r2rtf builds the RTF tables, listings and figures that go into clinical study reports, and its recent releases have been about widening who and what it can serve rather than changing how tables are composed. The 1.2.0 release added internationalization — a SimSun font path for Chinese characters plus hyphenation control — and 1.3.0 followed with write_docx() and write_html(), turning the LibreOffice conversion the package had documented into exported functions.

◆ Where it's heading

Two threads run through the window. One is output reach: RTF remains the composition target, but the artifacts that come out of it now include DOCX and HTML, and page numbering can be made table-relative across multi-page tables. The other is durability under a moving R and font stack — the ANSI/Unicode converter was rebuilt, the LaTeX mapping table generated from code rather than shipped as sysdata, unlist() usage fixed for R 4.5, and graphics-device leaks that produced stray Rplots.pdf closed off.

◆ Prediction

Having exported DOCX and HTML conversion, the likely next step is filling in what those formats lose relative to RTF — pagination and footnote fidelity are the obvious gaps. The i18n path currently covers Chinese only, so additional font families are the other plausible direction.

S
simtrial
ANALYTICS
0.0

A fixed-design trial simulator grew a pluggable test framework, then spent a year proving the numbers

◆ Current state

simtrial simulates time-to-event clinical trials and applies the tests used to analyse them — logrank, weighted logrank, MaxCombo, RMST, milestone. The 0.4.0 release turned it from a fixed-sample simulator into a group sequential one and standardised every test behind a common output contract, and the releases since have been about making that machinery correct and fast enough to run at scale. Version 1.0.0 arrived in June 2025 with the API settled and three vignettes explaining both the one-call and build-it-yourself paths.

◆ Where it's heading

Post-1.0 the work is almost entirely statistical correctness and speed, and it is concentrated in sim_gs_n(): one-sided efficacy bounds, stratified targeted-event cut dates, a helper that derives cuttings straight from the design object. Performance moves in one direction throughout — dplyr replaced by data.table, foreach combination replaced by manual assembly, parallelisation added to sim_fixed_n() — because simulation-based operating characteristics are only useful if you can afford enough replications.

◆ Prediction

The recent fixes cluster on stratified and group sequential paths, so the next release most likely continues there rather than adding a new test type. The cut_from_design() helper suggests tighter coupling to gsDesign2 design objects is the direction of travel.

Alternatives to r2rtf and simtrial

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either r2rtf or simtrial.

See all r2rtf alternatives → · See all simtrial alternatives →

Recent activity from r2rtf and simtrial

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 7mo agor2rtfDOCX and HTML output become exported functions
  2. 8mo agosimtrialOne-sided efficacy bound and stratified cut date corrected
  3. 11mo agosimtrialsim_gs_n moved to data.table; stratified design example added
  4. 11mo agor2rtfChinese character support arrives via an i18n font path
  5. 1y agosimtrial1.0.0 settles the wlr interface and documents both simulation paths
  6. 1y agor2rtfText colour fixed for figures encoded into RTF
  7. 1y agor2rtfFootnote handling fixed for R 4.5.0
  8. 1y agor2rtfUnicode converter rebuilt and mapping table made inspectable
  9. 1y agosimtrialMilestone Z-score denominator corrected; parallel sim_fixed_n arrives
  10. 2y agosimtrialChecks pass without Suggests dependencies
  11. 2y agosimtrialRMST and milestone tests, plus a user-definable cut and test framework
  12. 2y agor2rtfUTF-8 conversion fix and LibreOffice 7.6 support

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between r2rtf and simtrial?

Both compete on the same themes — pharmaverse — within Analytics. r2rtf and simtrial are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is r2rtf better than simtrial?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. r2rtf and simtrial are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to r2rtf?

Top r2rtf alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "r2rtf alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/r2rtf for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to simtrial?

Top simtrial alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "simtrial alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/simtrial for the full list with editorial commentary on each.