tidytlg
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
Comparison · Analytics
r2rtf vs S7
A side-by-side editorial comparison of r2rtf and S7 — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
r2rtf vs S7: at a glance
What is r2rtf?
The clinical-report table engine learned Chinese, then learned to leave RTF entirely
r2rtf builds the RTF tables, listings and figures that go into clinical study reports, and its recent releases have been about widening who and what it can serve rather than changing how tables are composed. The 1.2.0 release added internationalization — a SimSun font path for Chinese characters plus hyphenation control — and 1.3.0 followed with write_docx() and write_html(), turning the LibreOffice conversion the package had documented into exported functions.
What is S7?
S7 has stopped adding surface and started proving it holds up against R itself.
S7 is R's third-generation object system, built to unify the S3 and S4 lineages rather than add a fourth. The design work landed in 0.2.0, which reworked the default constructor, extended base-class coverage, and added a backward-compatibility shim so `@` property access works on R older than 4.3. Everything since has been maintenance: property setters gained a `check` escape hatch, and two consecutive releases exist mainly to keep the package compiling against R-devel 4.6.
r2rtf vs S7: editorial side-by-side
r2rtf
0.0ANALYTICS
The clinical-report table engine learned Chinese, then learned to leave RTF entirely
◆ Current state
r2rtf builds the RTF tables, listings and figures that go into clinical study reports, and its recent releases have been about widening who and what it can serve rather than changing how tables are composed. The 1.2.0 release added internationalization — a SimSun font path for Chinese characters plus hyphenation control — and 1.3.0 followed with write_docx() and write_html(), turning the LibreOffice conversion the package had documented into exported functions.
◆ Where it's heading
Two threads run through the window. One is output reach: RTF remains the composition target, but the artifacts that come out of it now include DOCX and HTML, and page numbering can be made table-relative across multi-page tables. The other is durability under a moving R and font stack — the ANSI/Unicode converter was rebuilt, the LaTeX mapping table generated from code rather than shipped as sysdata, unlist() usage fixed for R 4.5, and graphics-device leaks that produced stray Rplots.pdf closed off.
◆ Prediction
Having exported DOCX and HTML conversion, the likely next step is filling in what those formats lose relative to RTF — pagination and footnote fidelity are the obvious gaps. The i18n path currently covers Chinese only, so additional font families are the other plausible direction.
S7
0.0ANALYTICS
S7 has stopped adding surface and started proving it holds up against R itself.
◆ Current state
S7 is R's third-generation object system, built to unify the S3 and S4 lineages rather than add a fourth. The design work landed in 0.2.0, which reworked the default constructor, extended base-class coverage, and added a backward-compatibility shim so `@` property access works on R older than 4.3. Everything since has been maintenance: property setters gained a `check` escape hatch, and two consecutive releases exist mainly to keep the package compiling against R-devel 4.6.
◆ Where it's heading
The changelog is thinning by design — 0.1.0 was a months-long feature dump, 0.2.0 a coordinated architectural revision, 0.2.2 a single line about internal R-devel support. That shape usually means an API the maintainers consider settled, where the remaining work is tracking the host language rather than extending the system. The one recurring theme is validation cost: repeated releases have made validation less frequent, more targeted, or skippable outright.
◆ Prediction
Expect continued small releases pinned to R-devel changes rather than new class-system features, with any further movement most likely in the validation and property-setter path that the last two feature changes both touched.
Alternatives to r2rtf and S7
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either r2rtf or S7.
Tplyr
Tplyr made clinical summary tables explain where every number came from.
rlistings
Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.
hoardr
A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.
gigs
gigs redesigned its whole conversion API for rOpenSci, then spent three releases getting the docs to build.
riem
A weather-data client that keeps rewriting its HTTP layer while slowly tightening its API.
Recent activity from r2rtf and S7
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 3mo agoS7Internal fixes for R-devel 4.6 compatibility
- 7mo agor2rtfDOCX and HTML output become exported functions
- 9mo agoS7Property setters gain an opt-out from validation
- 11mo agor2rtfChinese character support arrives via an i18n font path ⚡
- 1y agor2rtfText colour fixed for figures encoded into RTF
- 1y agor2rtfFootnote handling fixed for R 4.5.0
- 1y agor2rtfUnicode converter rebuilt and mapping table made inspectable
- 1y agoS7Constructor rework and pre-4.3 support for @ access ⚡
- 2y agor2rtfUTF-8 conversion fix and LibreOffice 7.6 support
- 2y agoS7Per-property validators and better S3 method registration
- 2y agoS7First release: unions, set_props, and S4 virtual dispatch
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between r2rtf and S7?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. r2rtf and S7 are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is r2rtf better than S7?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. r2rtf and S7 are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to r2rtf?
Top r2rtf alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "r2rtf alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/r2rtf for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to S7?
Top S7 alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "S7 alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/s7 for the full list with editorial commentary on each.