DoseFinding
New stewardship at openpharma, then two releases adding the methods MCP-Mod was missing
Comparison · Analytics
r2rtf vs rstantools
A side-by-side editorial comparison of r2rtf and rstantools — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
r2rtf vs rstantools: at a glance
What is r2rtf?
The clinical-report table engine learned Chinese, then learned to leave RTF entirely
r2rtf builds the RTF tables, listings and figures that go into clinical study reports, and its recent releases have been about widening who and what it can serve rather than changing how tables are composed. The 1.2.0 release added internationalization — a SimSun font path for Chinese characters plus hyphenation control — and 1.3.0 followed with write_docx() and write_html(), turning the LibreOffice conversion the package had documented into exported functions.
What is rstantools?
The scaffolding layer for Stan-backed R packages, maintained rather than extended.
rstantools generates and maintains the build infrastructure that lets an R package ship Stan models — the inst/stan layout, the auto-generated C++, the Rcpp module loading, and the posterior_* generics downstream packages implement. Its releases are dominated by keeping that scaffolding compiling as Stan, StanHeaders, and rstan move underneath it. Version 2.7.0 continues that pattern, its one user-facing change being an allowance for deprecated syntax in specified versions of specified packages.
r2rtf vs rstantools: editorial side-by-side
r2rtf
0.0ANALYTICS
The clinical-report table engine learned Chinese, then learned to leave RTF entirely
◆ Current state
r2rtf builds the RTF tables, listings and figures that go into clinical study reports, and its recent releases have been about widening who and what it can serve rather than changing how tables are composed. The 1.2.0 release added internationalization — a SimSun font path for Chinese characters plus hyphenation control — and 1.3.0 followed with write_docx() and write_html(), turning the LibreOffice conversion the package had documented into exported functions.
◆ Where it's heading
Two threads run through the window. One is output reach: RTF remains the composition target, but the artifacts that come out of it now include DOCX and HTML, and page numbering can be made table-relative across multi-page tables. The other is durability under a moving R and font stack — the ANSI/Unicode converter was rebuilt, the LaTeX mapping table generated from code rather than shipped as sysdata, unlist() usage fixed for R 4.5, and graphics-device leaks that produced stray Rplots.pdf closed off.
◆ Prediction
Having exported DOCX and HTML conversion, the likely next step is filling in what those formats lose relative to RTF — pagination and footnote fidelity are the obvious gaps. The i18n path currently covers Chinese only, so additional font families are the other plausible direction.
rstantools
2.5ANALYTICS
The scaffolding layer for Stan-backed R packages, maintained rather than extended.
◆ Current state
rstantools generates and maintains the build infrastructure that lets an R package ship Stan models — the inst/stan layout, the auto-generated C++, the Rcpp module loading, and the posterior_* generics downstream packages implement. Its releases are dominated by keeping that scaffolding compiling as Stan, StanHeaders, and rstan move underneath it. Version 2.7.0 continues that pattern, its one user-facing change being an allowance for deprecated syntax in specified versions of specified packages.
◆ Where it's heading
This is a stable dependency in maintenance mode, and the release history reads accordingly: compatibility shims for new rstan and Stan RNG versions, C++ standard bumps, and pkgdown housekeeping. The last substantive API growth was 2.5.0's loo_epred() generic and discrete-data loo_pit(). Contributor churn is visible in recent releases, with several first-time contributors handling infrastructure rather than statistics.
◆ Prediction
Expect the next releases to continue tracking Stan and rstan breakage as it arrives; nothing in the recent entries points to new generics or a change in the package-generation model.
Alternatives to r2rtf and rstantools
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either r2rtf or rstantools.
webmockr
The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else
crul
crul took mocking back from webmockr and made it a property of the client itself
dendroNetwork
Six releases, six identical bodies — the feed carries the package abstract instead of release notes
chattr
chattr deleted every LLM integration it had written and outsourced the lot to ellmer
cloudml
Six years since the last functional change, and Google renamed the service it wraps in the release before that
See all r2rtf alternatives → · See all rstantools alternatives →
Recent activity from r2rtf and rstantools
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 19d agorstantoolsDeprecated syntax allowed for pinned package versions
- 7mo agorstantoolspkgdown theme refresh, C++14 dropped from SystemRequirements
- 7mo agor2rtfDOCX and HTML output become exported functions
- 11mo agorstantoolsloo_epred() generic added, loo_pit() extended to discrete data
- 11mo agor2rtfChinese character support arrives via an i18n font path ⚡
- 1y agor2rtfText colour fixed for figures encoded into RTF
- 1y agor2rtfFootnote handling fixed for R 4.5.0
- 1y agor2rtfUnicode converter rebuilt and mapping table made inspectable
- 2y agorstantoolsStandalone Stan functions fixed for rstan 2.33+
- 2y agor2rtfUTF-8 conversion fix and LibreOffice 7.6 support
- 3y agorstantoolsinit_cpp deprecated, standalone-function bugfix under Stan 2.31
- 3y agorstantoolsC++17 standard adopted, standalone function export reworked
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between r2rtf and rstantools?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. rstantools is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is r2rtf better than rstantools?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. rstantools is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to r2rtf?
Top r2rtf alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "r2rtf alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/r2rtf for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to rstantools?
Top rstantools alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rstantools alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rstantools for the full list with editorial commentary on each.