← Back to home
Comparison · DevOps

QuestDB vs Slurm

A side-by-side editorial comparison of QuestDB and Slurm — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

QuestDB vs Slurm: at a glance

FeatureQuestDBSlurm
SectorDevOpsDevOps
Velocity score5.05.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themestime-series, market-data, arrow, parquethpc, job-scheduling, security, cluster-management
Last editorial update10h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is QuestDB?

QuestDB keeps proving its market-data case with reproducible benchmarks between releases.

QuestDB 10.1 and Enterprise 4.1 are the October product releases: merge-append partitions for late data, SUBSAMPLE and exact percentiles, then resource groups, audited views and OIDC for shared clusters. The newest entry is a benchmark rather than a release, replaying 354 million top-of-book events for a full US equities day as Arrow, with memory and throughput figures and rerunnable code. The rest of the feed is technical content on joins, Parquet and QWP compression.

Read the full QuestDB trajectory →

What is Slurm?

Slurm's newest entry is a test case, not a release; 26.05.5 is still current.

Slurm maintains three branches (25.05, 25.11, 26.05). On September 2 it shipped coordinated security releases on all three fixing seven CVEs, including an operator-to-administrator privilege escalation and SQL injection via cluster names. 26.05.5 on October 13 returned to ordinary fixes. The newest feed item is a testsuite commit checking that step cancels in --stepmgr jobs record the job owner rather than root.

Read the full Slurm trajectory →

QuestDB vs Slurm: editorial side-by-side

Q
QuestDB
DEVOPS
5.0

QuestDB keeps proving its market-data case with reproducible benchmarks between releases.

◆ Current state

QuestDB 10.1 and Enterprise 4.1 are the October product releases: merge-append partitions for late data, SUBSAMPLE and exact percentiles, then resource groups, audited views and OIDC for shared clusters. The newest entry is a benchmark rather than a release, replaying 354 million top-of-book events for a full US equities day as Arrow, with memory and throughput figures and rerunnable code. The rest of the feed is technical content on joins, Parquet and QWP compression.

◆ Where it's heading

The release work and the content point the same way: QuestDB as the shared store for trading data, read by many teams and many engines. Enterprise features govern how a cluster is shared, while the posts show the data leaving QuestDB through Parquet and Arrow at volume.

◆ Prediction

Expect the next release to target read-out paths such as Arrow streaming or Parquet export, since the benchmarks are already measuring them; the entries do not show a date.

S
Slurm
DEVOPS
5.0

Slurm's newest entry is a test case, not a release; 26.05.5 is still current.

◆ Current state

Slurm maintains three branches (25.05, 25.11, 26.05). On September 2 it shipped coordinated security releases on all three fixing seven CVEs, including an operator-to-administrator privilege escalation and SQL injection via cluster names. 26.05.5 on October 13 returned to ordinary fixes. The newest feed item is a testsuite commit checking that step cancels in --stepmgr jobs record the job owner rather than root.

◆ Where it's heading

Slurm's cadence is monthly point releases on the 26.05 line with occasional coordinated security drops across all supported branches. The test commit points at accounting accuracy for step-manager jobs as current work.

◆ Prediction

A 26.05.6 point release in November is likely, possibly including the --stepmgr cancel accounting fix the new test covers.

Alternatives to QuestDB and Slurm

Other DevOps products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either QuestDB or Slurm.

See all QuestDB alternatives → · See all Slurm alternatives →

Recent activity from QuestDB and Slurm

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 21h agoSlurmwickberg-test: Testsuite - Cover a --stepmgr step cancel in test_101_18
  2. 1d agoQuestDBMarket data replay for backtesting: a full day of US equities from QuestDB
  3. 7d agoQuestDBOne table, three readers: QuestDB, Polars and DuckDB on the same Parquet
  4. 9d agoQuestDBQuestDB Enterprise 4.1: governance for shared clusters
  5. 13d agoQuestDBQuestDB 10.1: less I/O for late data, and more analysis in SQL
  6. 14d agoQuestDBIngesting live market data from Databento into QuestDB
  7. 22d agoSlurmv26.05.5
  8. 1mo agoQuestDBQuestDB's QWP under the hood: Gorilla timestamp compression
  9. 2mo agoSlurmSlurm 26.05.4 fixes 7 CVEs, including privilege escalation
  10. 2mo agoSlurmSlurm 25.11.8: CVE backport security release
  11. 2mo agoSlurmSlurm 25.05.9: CVE backport security release
  12. 2mo agoSlurmv26.05.3

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between QuestDB and Slurm?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. QuestDB and Slurm are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 5.0 vs 5.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is QuestDB better than Slurm?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. QuestDB and Slurm are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 5.0 vs 5.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other DevOps products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to QuestDB?

Top QuestDB alternatives in DevOps are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "QuestDB alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/questdb for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Slurm?

Top Slurm alternatives in DevOps are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Slurm alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/slurm for the full list with editorial commentary on each.