← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

qtl2 vs vinereg

A side-by-side editorial comparison of qtl2 and vinereg — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

qtl2 vs vinereg: at a glance

Featureqtl2vinereg
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score2.50.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesqtl-mapping, statistical-genetics, bioinformatics, r-packager-package, copulas, regression, conditional-density
Last editorial update6h ago53m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is qtl2?

The standard QTL mapping package in R opened its genome scan to user-supplied likelihood models.

qtl2 is the R toolkit for QTL mapping in experimental crosses, covering genotype probability calculation, genome scans with and without polygenic effects, permutation testing, SNP association, and the plotting that goes with them. The last year of work has pushed hard in two directions: tooling for high-throughput expression and protein QTL studies, and a generalisation of the scan engine itself so the log-likelihood being maximised can be supplied by the user. Note that the release history reached this feed out of order, so feed position is not a reliable guide to which release came first.

Read the full qtl2 trajectory →

What is vinereg?

Conditional density and log-likelihood fill out a vine copula regression package.

vinereg fits D-vine copula-based regression models on top of rvinecopulib and kde1d, in Thomas Nagler's package stack. The January 2025 pair - 0.10.0 and 0.11.0 tagged the same day - adds a pdf() function and then fixes conditional density computation for discrete variables while requiring the newer kde1d. Release notes run to one or two bullets each.

Read the full vinereg trajectory →

qtl2 vs vinereg: editorial side-by-side

Q
qtl2
ANALYTICS
2.5

The standard QTL mapping package in R opened its genome scan to user-supplied likelihood models.

◆ Current state

qtl2 is the R toolkit for QTL mapping in experimental crosses, covering genotype probability calculation, genome scans with and without polygenic effects, permutation testing, SNP association, and the plotting that goes with them. The last year of work has pushed hard in two directions: tooling for high-throughput expression and protein QTL studies, and a generalisation of the scan engine itself so the log-likelihood being maximised can be supplied by the user. Note that the release history reached this feed out of order, so feed position is not a reliable guide to which release came first.

◆ Where it's heading

The eQTL and pQTL direction is the clearest thread — cis-trans plots, hotspot counting over a sliding window, multi-trait scan heat maps, and genome-wide genotype plots all arrived together, which is the toolkit an experiment with thousands of traits needs rather than one with a handful. Running underneath it is a steady generalisation of the core: a scan function that accepts an arbitrary likelihood, permutations that work with alternative scan functions, full variance-covariance output from single-position fits. Performance and parallelism get attention each cycle, including a more considerate default that leaves one core free. The rest is the ordinary maintenance of a long-lived package — renames to avoid tidyverse collisions, compiler warnings, and correctness fixes on specific cross types.

◆ Prediction

With scan1gen and permutation support for alternative scan functions in place, the natural next step is more model types built on that hook rather than more special-cased scan functions; the entries do not indicate which models are planned.

V
vinereg
ANALYTICS
0.0

Conditional density and log-likelihood fill out a vine copula regression package.

◆ Current state

vinereg fits D-vine copula-based regression models on top of rvinecopulib and kde1d, in Thomas Nagler's package stack. The January 2025 pair - 0.10.0 and 0.11.0 tagged the same day - adds a pdf() function and then fixes conditional density computation for discrete variables while requiring the newer kde1d. Release notes run to one or two bullets each.

◆ Where it's heading

Work has concentrated on evaluation rather than fitting: cll() in 0.9.0, pdf() in 0.10.0, and the discrete-variable correction in 0.11.0 all concern what can be computed from a model already fitted. Releases arrive in same-day pairs, and the notes are terse enough that 0.10.0 reuses 0.9.0's wording verbatim, describing pdf() with cll()'s sentence. Version floors also track the sibling packages - kde1d here, rvinecopulib in 0.8.3.

◆ Prediction

Given the shared release rhythm across the stack, the next entry is as likely to be a dependency-driven bump as a new function; the discrete-variable path is the one area these notes show as recently unstable.

Alternatives to qtl2 and vinereg

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either qtl2 or vinereg.

See all qtl2 alternatives → · See all vinereg alternatives →

Recent activity from qtl2 and vinereg

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 27d agoqtl2chr_lengths() extended to cross2 objects
  2. 1mo agoqtl2A genome scan that takes your own likelihood function
  3. 2mo agoqtl2Hotspot counting and cis-trans plots for eQTL studies
  4. 3mo agoqtl2Confidence interval plotting, plus a documentation correction
  5. 1y agoqtl2Finer-grained parallelism for kinship-based scans
  6. 1y agoqtl2CSV readers renamed to avoid the readr collision
  7. 1y agovineregDiscrete conditional densities fixed; kde1d 1.1.0 required
  8. 1y agovineregpdf() added for conditional density
  9. 2y agovineregBoost compile flag and a weights error fixed
  10. 2y agovineregcll() computes conditional log-likelihood
  11. 4y agovineregvinecopulib floor raised for RcppThread compatibility
  12. 4y agovineregcpit() fixed and external marginals allowed via uscale

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between qtl2 and vinereg?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. qtl2 is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is qtl2 better than vinereg?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. qtl2 is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to qtl2?

Top qtl2 alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "qtl2 alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/qtl2 for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to vinereg?

Top vinereg alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "vinereg alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/vinereg for the full list with editorial commentary on each.