wooldridge
A textbook data package whose whole job is to stay installable, and whose releases prove how much work that is.
Comparison · Infra & APIs
projoint vs Windmill
A side-by-side editorial comparison of projoint and Windmill — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
projoint vs Windmill: at a glance
What is projoint?
projoint spent a year on CRAN paperwork, then shipped a correctness fix it flagged itself.
projoint is an R package for analysing conjoint survey experiments, covering Qualtrics import, reshaping, and quantity-of-interest estimation with inter-rater reliability correction. Most of its release history is CRAN admission work — citation formats, DESCRIPTION fields, \value{} tags, vignette cleanups — with four tags backfilled within ninety seconds of each other on 15 July in non-monotonic version order, so neither tag order nor timestamps in this feed track the real sequence. The substantive releases are the ones fixing data-preparation bugs that silently corrupt estimates.
What is Windmill?
Windmill gave away the warehouse connectors and now runs dbt natively — the trial is the strategy.
Two lines are moving at once. The platform line made dbt projects a first-class runtime, unified the deployment target on workspace lineage, opened Compare & Deploy to arbitrary target workspaces, and moved BigQuery and Snowflake out from behind the Enterprise license. The AI line took sessions to beta on by default and has been adding controls around them since — file attachments, visible web-search sources, artifact version history, and now a read-only plan mode that refuses anything that writes or deploys until you approve a plan.
projoint vs Windmill: editorial side-by-side
projoint
2.5INFRA · APIS
projoint spent a year on CRAN paperwork, then shipped a correctness fix it flagged itself.
◆ Current state
projoint is an R package for analysing conjoint survey experiments, covering Qualtrics import, reshaping, and quantity-of-interest estimation with inter-rater reliability correction. Most of its release history is CRAN admission work — citation formats, DESCRIPTION fields, \value{} tags, vignette cleanups — with four tags backfilled within ninety seconds of each other on 15 July in non-monotonic version order, so neither tag order nor timestamps in this feed track the real sequence. The substantive releases are the ones fixing data-preparation bugs that silently corrupt estimates.
◆ Where it's heading
The maintainer is hardening the path from raw Qualtrics export to estimate, which is where conjoint analysis quietly goes wrong. Three separate releases fix that path: dropped respondent-level weights in organize_data(), repeated-task reshaping in reshape_projoint(), and choice-to-profile mapping in 1.1.3. Each fix now arrives with regression tests and stricter validation rather than just a patch, and 1.1.3 adds an explicit .choice_map so the mapping is auditable instead of inferred.
◆ Prediction
Expect the validation-and-regression-test pattern to keep extending across the import path, with releases continuing to arrive in bursts around CRAN submission rather than on a cadence.
Windmill
8.8INFRA · APIS
Windmill gave away the warehouse connectors and now runs dbt natively — the trial is the strategy.
◆ Current state
Two lines are moving at once. The platform line made dbt projects a first-class runtime, unified the deployment target on workspace lineage, opened Compare & Deploy to arbitrary target workspaces, and moved BigQuery and Snowflake out from behind the Enterprise license. The AI line took sessions to beta on by default and has been adding controls around them since — file attachments, visible web-search sources, artifact version history, and now a read-only plan mode that refuses anything that writes or deploys until you approve a plan.
◆ Where it's heading
Windmill is positioning as the place a data team's existing work already runs rather than a system to be ported to: an unmodified dbt project drops in, its models become addressable assets with ref() lineage, and the warehouse languages needed to reach them are no longer paywalled. In parallel, the AI session work is maturing from capability to governance — the recent additions are all about reviewability and constraint, not raw autonomy. The deployment changes point the same way, collapsing configurable targets into a single derived answer.
◆ Prediction
Expect the plan-and-approve posture to spread beyond session chats into the durable AI surfaces, and more warehouse-adjacent runtimes to follow dbt into the first-class treatment; Oracle and MS SQL remain the obvious Enterprise holdouts to watch.
Alternatives to projoint and Windmill
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either projoint or Windmill.
L1centrality
A graph-centrality package that spent 2026 making its existing measures usable at scale, then went quiet.
exametrika
A test-theory package that grew into a graphical-model toolkit, now spending its releases paying down the API debt that growth created.
nuggets
nuggets keeps compounding on the 2.0 rewrite — more pattern families, lighter install.
eratosthenes
eratosthenes spends 0.1.0 hardening inputs rather than adding chronology methods.
dqcheckr
dqcheckr adds drift analysis, then removes the YAML a user had to hand-write.
See all projoint alternatives → · See all Windmill alternatives →
Recent activity from projoint and Windmill
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 5d agoWindmillPlan mode for AI sessions
- 8d agoWindmillNested filter groups and dotted paths in trigger filters
- 9d agoWindmillVersion history for AI session artifacts
- 17d agoprojointExplicit .choice_map guards choice-to-profile mapping
- 18d agoWindmillRun dbt projects as a first-class Windmill runtime ⚡
- 20d agoWindmillOne deployment target, derived from the workspace lineage
- 20d agoWindmillCompare & Deploy into any workspace
- 1mo agoprojointCRAN submission housekeeping for DESCRIPTION and examples
- 1mo agoprojointCRAN formatting pass; minor make_projoint_data() fix
- 1mo agoprojointreshape_projoint() repeated-task bug fixed; validation tightened
- 1mo agoprojointCitation metadata updated with the CRAN DOI
- 5mo agoprojointorganize_data() no longer drops respondent-level weights
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between projoint and Windmill?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Windmill is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 8.8 vs 2.5), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is projoint better than Windmill?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Windmill is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 8.8 vs 2.5), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to projoint?
Top projoint alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "projoint alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/projoint for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to Windmill?
Top Windmill alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Windmill alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/windmill for the full list with editorial commentary on each.