exametrika
A test-theory package that grew into a graphical-model toolkit, now spending its releases paying down the API debt that growth created.
A side-by-side editorial comparison of projoint and vdiffr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
projoint spent a year on CRAN paperwork, then shipped a correctness fix it flagged itself.
projoint is an R package for analysing conjoint survey experiments, covering Qualtrics import, reshaping, and quantity-of-interest estimation with inter-rater reliability correction. Most of its release history is CRAN admission work — citation formats, DESCRIPTION fields, \value{} tags, vignette cleanups — with four tags backfilled within ninety seconds of each other on 15 July in non-monotonic version order, so neither tag order nor timestamps in this feed track the real sequence. The substantive releases are the ones fixing data-preparation bugs that silently corrupt estimates.
vdiffr finished its job in 2021 and has been tracking compilers ever since.
vdiffr generates deterministic SVG snapshots so plot changes show up as test failures. Its recent history is almost entirely toolchain: UCRT Windows compatibility twice, a revert to C++11 to work around a GCC issue, and renaming the internal SVG device so it stops colliding with svglite. The only functional additions in view are snapshot variants in 1.0.8 and a testthat fix so snapshots are no longer auto-deleted when a test errors or skips. The last release was October 2024.
projoint is an R package for analysing conjoint survey experiments, covering Qualtrics import, reshaping, and quantity-of-interest estimation with inter-rater reliability correction. Most of its release history is CRAN admission work — citation formats, DESCRIPTION fields, \value{} tags, vignette cleanups — with four tags backfilled within ninety seconds of each other on 15 July in non-monotonic version order, so neither tag order nor timestamps in this feed track the real sequence. The substantive releases are the ones fixing data-preparation bugs that silently corrupt estimates.
The maintainer is hardening the path from raw Qualtrics export to estimate, which is where conjoint analysis quietly goes wrong. Three separate releases fix that path: dropped respondent-level weights in organize_data(), repeated-task reshaping in reshape_projoint(), and choice-to-profile mapping in 1.1.3. Each fix now arrives with regression tests and stricter validation rather than just a patch, and 1.1.3 adds an explicit .choice_map so the mapping is auditable instead of inferred.
Expect the validation-and-regression-test pattern to keep extending across the import path, with releases continuing to arrive in bursts around CRAN submission rather than on a cadence.
vdiffr generates deterministic SVG snapshots so plot changes show up as test failures. Its recent history is almost entirely toolchain: UCRT Windows compatibility twice, a revert to C++11 to work around a GCC issue, and renaming the internal SVG device so it stops colliding with svglite. The only functional additions in view are snapshot variants in 1.0.8 and a testthat fix so snapshots are no longer auto-deleted when a test errors or skips. The last release was October 2024.
The package reached its intended shape at 1.0.0, when snapshot management moved to testthat and vdiffr shed most of its own R and JavaScript code to become a reproducible SVG engine and nothing more. There is not much left to add to that, and the release stream since reads accordingly: it moves when a compiler, an R version, or testthat moves. For a testing dependency this is a healthy end state, though it does mean the package inherits whatever the graphics engine does to snapshot stability.
The entries do not support predicting a feature release. The likely next change is a compatibility fix prompted by a compiler or a testthat change, as every release since 1.0.2 has been.
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either projoint or vdiffr.
A test-theory package that grew into a graphical-model toolkit, now spending its releases paying down the API debt that growth created.
nuggets keeps compounding on the 2.0 rewrite — more pattern families, lighter install.
eratosthenes spends 0.1.0 hardening inputs rather than adding chronology methods.
dqcheckr adds drift analysis, then removes the YAML a user had to hand-write.
An actuarial mainstay spends its releases on CI plumbing, not on new mathematics.
EDAForge is a data-quality auditor renamed mid-flight, still finding its CRAN footing.
See all projoint alternatives → · See all vdiffr alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. projoint is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. projoint is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
Top projoint alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "projoint alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/projoint for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top vdiffr alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "vdiffr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/vdiffr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.