exametrika
A test-theory package that grew into a graphical-model toolkit, now spending its releases paying down the API debt that growth created.
Comparison · Infra & APIs
projoint vs simDAG
A side-by-side editorial comparison of projoint and simDAG — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:r-package
projoint vs simDAG: at a glance
What is projoint?
projoint spent a year on CRAN paperwork, then shipped a correctness fix it flagged itself.
projoint is an R package for analysing conjoint survey experiments, covering Qualtrics import, reshaping, and quantity-of-interest estimation with inter-rater reliability correction. Most of its release history is CRAN admission work — citation formats, DESCRIPTION fields, \value{} tags, vignette cleanups — with four tags backfilled within ninety seconds of each other on 15 July in non-monotonic version order, so neither tag order nor timestamps in this feed track the real sequence. The substantive releases are the ones fixing data-preparation bugs that silently corrupt estimates.
What is simDAG?
simDAG grew a second simulation engine, then spent two releases surviving upstream breakage.
simDAG generates data from directed acyclic graphs, with a library of node types covering Gaussian, binomial, Poisson, negative binomial, zero-inflated, ordered regression, Cox, and Aalen models. The 1.0.0 milestone opened node_cox() to arbitrary baseline hazard functions, which lets continuous time-dependent hazards drive discrete-event simulations. The two most recent releases exist only to keep the package on CRAN through breakage in lme4 and simr.
projoint vs simDAG: editorial side-by-side
projoint
2.5INFRA · APIS
projoint spent a year on CRAN paperwork, then shipped a correctness fix it flagged itself.
◆ Current state
projoint is an R package for analysing conjoint survey experiments, covering Qualtrics import, reshaping, and quantity-of-interest estimation with inter-rater reliability correction. Most of its release history is CRAN admission work — citation formats, DESCRIPTION fields, \value{} tags, vignette cleanups — with four tags backfilled within ninety seconds of each other on 15 July in non-monotonic version order, so neither tag order nor timestamps in this feed track the real sequence. The substantive releases are the ones fixing data-preparation bugs that silently corrupt estimates.
◆ Where it's heading
The maintainer is hardening the path from raw Qualtrics export to estimate, which is where conjoint analysis quietly goes wrong. Three separate releases fix that path: dropped respondent-level weights in organize_data(), repeated-task reshaping in reshape_projoint(), and choice-to-profile mapping in 1.1.3. Each fix now arrives with regression tests and stricter validation rather than just a patch, and 1.1.3 adds an explicit .choice_map so the mapping is auditable instead of inferred.
◆ Prediction
Expect the validation-and-regression-test pattern to keep extending across the import path, with releases continuing to arrive in bursts around CRAN submission rather than on a cadence.
simDAG
2.5INFRA · APIS
simDAG grew a second simulation engine, then spent two releases surviving upstream breakage.
◆ Current state
simDAG generates data from directed acyclic graphs, with a library of node types covering Gaussian, binomial, Poisson, negative binomial, zero-inflated, ordered regression, Cox, and Aalen models. The 1.0.0 milestone opened node_cox() to arbitrary baseline hazard functions, which lets continuous time-dependent hazards drive discrete-event simulations. The two most recent releases exist only to keep the package on CRAN through breakage in lme4 and simr.
◆ Where it's heading
The package has been widening what a simulation can represent rather than deepening any one node. Networks arrived in 0.4.0 so individuals could depend on each other, discrete-event simulation in continuous time arrived in 0.5.0 as an alternative to the discrete-time engine, and 1.0.0 connected the two by letting continuous hazards feed the event-driven path. Alongside that, node types keep accumulating for outcome families the framework could not previously generate.
◆ Prediction
Expect the node library to keep expanding into outcome types the discrete-event engine can now support, though the recent releases suggest upstream dependency churn will keep consuming release slots.
Alternatives to projoint and simDAG
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either projoint or simDAG.
nuggets
nuggets keeps compounding on the 2.0 rewrite — more pattern families, lighter install.
eratosthenes
eratosthenes spends 0.1.0 hardening inputs rather than adding chronology methods.
dqcheckr
dqcheckr adds drift analysis, then removes the YAML a user had to hand-write.
lifecontingencies
An actuarial mainstay spends its releases on CI plumbing, not on new mathematics.
EDAForge
EDAForge is a data-quality auditor renamed mid-flight, still finding its CRAN footing.
See all projoint alternatives → · See all simDAG alternatives →
Recent activity from projoint and simDAG
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 17d agoprojointExplicit .choice_map guards choice-to-profile mapping
- 19d agosimDAGCRAN-retention patch for upstream lme4 breakage
- 1mo agoprojointCRAN submission housekeeping for DESCRIPTION and examples
- 1mo agoprojointCRAN formatting pass; minor make_projoint_data() fix
- 1mo agoprojointreshape_projoint() repeated-task bug fixed; validation tightened
- 1mo agoprojointCitation metadata updated with the CRAN DOI
- 3mo agosimDAGArbitrary baseline hazards connect node_cox() to discrete-event sims
- 4mo agosimDAGTest-only fix for an upstream simr update
- 5mo agosimDAGAdds node_polr() for ordinal outcomes and rsurv node support
- 5mo agoprojointorganize_data() no longer drops respondent-level weights
- 7mo agosimDAGAdds continuous-time discrete-event simulation ⚡
- 10mo agosimDAGAdds link functions to node types and fixes a broken seed default
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between projoint and simDAG?
Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Infra & APIs. projoint and simDAG are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 2.5 vs 2.5, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is projoint better than simDAG?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. projoint and simDAG are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 2.5 vs 2.5, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to projoint?
Top projoint alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "projoint alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/projoint for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to simDAG?
Top simDAG alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "simDAG alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/simdag for the full list with editorial commentary on each.