wooldridge
A textbook data package whose whole job is to stay installable, and whose releases prove how much work that is.
Comparison · Infra & APIs
projoint vs rapr
A side-by-side editorial comparison of projoint and rapr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:r-package
projoint vs rapr: at a glance
What is projoint?
projoint spent a year on CRAN paperwork, then shipped a correctness fix it flagged itself.
projoint is an R package for analysing conjoint survey experiments, covering Qualtrics import, reshaping, and quantity-of-interest estimation with inter-rater reliability correction. Most of its release history is CRAN admission work — citation formats, DESCRIPTION fields, \value{} tags, vignette cleanups — with four tags backfilled within ninety seconds of each other on 15 July in non-monotonic version order, so neither tag order nor timestamps in this feed track the real sequence. The substantive releases are the ones fixing data-preparation bugs that silently corrupt estimates.
What is rapr?
rapr generalises its Rangeland Analysis Platform API access one endpoint at a time
rapr pulls Rangeland Analysis Platform data into R — vegetation cover and production rasters derived from Landsat and Sentinel-2, plus the tabular summary APIs. The 1.1.3 release replaces the single-purpose table function with a general get_rap_table() covering the cover, coverMeteorology, production and production16day endpoints. The package reached CRAN in 2025 and is maintained by brownag, who also maintains the GeoPackage interface gpkg.
projoint vs rapr: editorial side-by-side
projoint
2.5INFRA · APIS
projoint spent a year on CRAN paperwork, then shipped a correctness fix it flagged itself.
◆ Current state
projoint is an R package for analysing conjoint survey experiments, covering Qualtrics import, reshaping, and quantity-of-interest estimation with inter-rater reliability correction. Most of its release history is CRAN admission work — citation formats, DESCRIPTION fields, \value{} tags, vignette cleanups — with four tags backfilled within ninety seconds of each other on 15 July in non-monotonic version order, so neither tag order nor timestamps in this feed track the real sequence. The substantive releases are the ones fixing data-preparation bugs that silently corrupt estimates.
◆ Where it's heading
The maintainer is hardening the path from raw Qualtrics export to estimate, which is where conjoint analysis quietly goes wrong. Three separate releases fix that path: dropped respondent-level weights in organize_data(), repeated-task reshaping in reshape_projoint(), and choice-to-profile mapping in 1.1.3. Each fix now arrives with regression tests and stricter validation rather than just a patch, and 1.1.3 adds an explicit .choice_map so the mapping is auditable instead of inferred.
◆ Prediction
Expect the validation-and-regression-test pattern to keep extending across the import path, with releases continuing to arrive in bursts around CRAN submission rather than on a cadence.
rapr
0.0INFRA · APIS
rapr generalises its Rangeland Analysis Platform API access one endpoint at a time
◆ Current state
rapr pulls Rangeland Analysis Platform data into R — vegetation cover and production rasters derived from Landsat and Sentinel-2, plus the tabular summary APIs. The 1.1.3 release replaces the single-purpose table function with a general get_rap_table() covering the cover, coverMeteorology, production and production16day endpoints. The package reached CRAN in 2025 and is maintained by brownag, who also maintains the GeoPackage interface gpkg.
◆ Where it's heading
The shape is familiar for a young API client: add access to one endpoint, then generalise it once a second endpoint proves the pattern. get_rap_production16day_table() arrived in 1.1.0 and was deprecated three releases later in favour of a product argument. Between those, the work was error handling — empty geometries, server-side HTTP failures, warning timing — the unglamorous half of wrapping a remote service. The 1.0.0 release had already set the ambition by exposing both the 30m Landsat and 10m Sentinel-2 sources behind one argument.
◆ Prediction
Expect the remaining RAP endpoints to be folded into get_rap_table() as they are needed, and the deprecated 16-day function to be removed once the general interface has been out long enough.
Alternatives to projoint and rapr
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either projoint or rapr.
L1centrality
A graph-centrality package that spent 2026 making its existing measures usable at scale, then went quiet.
exametrika
A test-theory package that grew into a graphical-model toolkit, now spending its releases paying down the API debt that growth created.
nuggets
nuggets keeps compounding on the 2.0 rewrite — more pattern families, lighter install.
eratosthenes
eratosthenes spends 0.1.0 hardening inputs rather than adding chronology methods.
dqcheckr
dqcheckr adds drift analysis, then removes the YAML a user had to hand-write.
See all projoint alternatives → · See all rapr alternatives →
Recent activity from projoint and rapr
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 17d agoprojointExplicit .choice_map guards choice-to-profile mapping
- 1mo agoprojointCRAN submission housekeeping for DESCRIPTION and examples
- 1mo agoprojointCRAN formatting pass; minor make_projoint_data() fix
- 1mo agoprojointreshape_projoint() repeated-task bug fixed; validation tightened
- 1mo agoprojointCitation metadata updated with the CRAN DOI
- 5mo agoraprUnified get_rap_table() replaces the single-endpoint function
- 5mo agoprojointorganize_data() no longer drops respondent-level weights
- 6mo agoraprrapr 1.1.2
- 9mo agoraprTabular 16-day production API access, plus error handling
- 1y agoraprCRAN release adds 10m Sentinel-2 source and grid templating
- 1y agoraprFinal 0.1.x snapshot before the 1.x rewrite
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between projoint and rapr?
Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Infra & APIs. projoint is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is projoint better than rapr?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. projoint is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to projoint?
Top projoint alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "projoint alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/projoint for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to rapr?
Top rapr alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rapr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rapr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.