← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

PowerTOST vs tf

A side-by-side editorial comparison of PowerTOST and tf — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

PowerTOST vs tf: at a glance

FeaturePowerTOSTtf
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesbioequivalence, sample-size, regulatory, pharmacometricsfunctional-data-analysis, vctrs, multivariate, r-packages
Last editorial update19h ago44m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is PowerTOST?

A bioequivalence sample-size workhorse whose news is which regulator it now covers

PowerTOST computes power and sample size for bioequivalence and its changelog reads as a record of regulatory divergence more than statistical development. Version 1.5-3 added the Gulf Co-operation Council as a regulator setting; 1.5-4 and 1.5-6 stripped 'FDA' out of the narrow-therapeutic-index function names once China's CDE began requiring the same evaluation. The most recent release, 1.5-7, is a single fix to how nvec() splits a total sample size across sequences.

Read the full PowerTOST trajectory →

What is tf?

tf gave functional data a second dimension: curves whose values are vectors.

tf supplies the vector classes underneath the tidyfun stack — tfd for raw functional observations, tfb for basis-represented ones, both built on vctrs so curves sit in a data frame column and behave like any other vector. Until July that codomain was scalar. The 0.5.0 release adds tfd_mv and tfb_mv, classes for functions whose values are vectors in R^d, and rebuilds the analysis verbs to match.

Read the full tf trajectory →

PowerTOST vs tf: editorial side-by-side

P
PowerTOST
INFRA · APIS
0.0

A bioequivalence sample-size workhorse whose news is which regulator it now covers

◆ Current state

PowerTOST computes power and sample size for bioequivalence and its changelog reads as a record of regulatory divergence more than statistical development. Version 1.5-3 added the Gulf Co-operation Council as a regulator setting; 1.5-4 and 1.5-6 stripped 'FDA' out of the narrow-therapeutic-index function names once China's CDE began requiring the same evaluation. The most recent release, 1.5-7, is a single fix to how nvec() splits a total sample size across sequences.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is in long maintenance with a widening regulatory surface: the statistical methods are settled, and releases arrive when an agency publishes a framework that can be expressed as a settings variant of an existing method. Function naming has been deliberately decoupled from any single agency, with the deprecated FDA-suffixed aliases carried for years before removal. Cadence has slowed to roughly one release every eighteen months.

◆ Prediction

The next release is most likely another regulator setting or a small fix; on the deprecation notice already given, the power.NTIDFDA()-style aliases are the obvious removal candidate.

T
tf
INFRA · APIS
0.0

tf gave functional data a second dimension: curves whose values are vectors.

◆ Current state

tf supplies the vector classes underneath the tidyfun stack — tfd for raw functional observations, tfb for basis-represented ones, both built on vctrs so curves sit in a data frame column and behave like any other vector. Until July that codomain was scalar. The 0.5.0 release adds tfd_mv and tfb_mv, classes for functions whose values are vectors in R^d, and rebuilds the analysis verbs to match.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is widening what a functional observation can be, then porting the toolkit onto it. Registration arrived first in 0.4.0 for univariate curves and immediately gained an srvf_mv method for aligning components jointly, and tfb_mfpc() ports principal component analysis to the multivariate case with a single set of scores shared across components. Alongside that runs steady dependency shedding — mvtnorm and pracma both replaced by inlined samplers that reproduce prior draws bit-for-bit, glue dropped for cli in the previous release — and an unusually long tail of NA-handling and edge-case fixes, several caught in pre-release review of the new classes.

◆ Prediction

The new classes ship with FPCA, registration and shape alignment but the release notes describe tidyfun::tf_unnest() as the consumer of one new export, so the visible next step is the rest of the tidyfun stack catching up to vector-valued columns. Expect follow-up patches on the vctrs casting paths, which is where most of this release's late fixes clustered.

Alternatives to PowerTOST and tf

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either PowerTOST or tf.

See all PowerTOST alternatives → · See all tf alternatives →

Recent activity from PowerTOST and tf

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agotfVector-valued functional data becomes a first-class type
  2. 5mo agotfCurve registration, five depth measures and sub-domain splitting
  3. 10mo agoPowerTOSTFix for splitting total sample size across sequences
  4. 2y agotfFix: tf_crosscov normalization
  5. 2y agoPowerTOSTNTID functions renamed off the FDA acronym; GCC guidance in vignettes
  6. 4y agoPowerTOSTpower.NTID() aliases added; FDA-suffixed names deprecated
  7. 5y agoPowerTOSTGulf Co-operation Council added as a regulator setting
  8. 5y agoPowerTOSTMaintenance release with vignette and documentation clarifications
  9. 5y agoPowerTOSTstringsAsFactors fix for older R in a vignette example

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between PowerTOST and tf?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. PowerTOST and tf are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is PowerTOST better than tf?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. PowerTOST and tf are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to PowerTOST?

Top PowerTOST alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "PowerTOST alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/powertost for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to tf?

Top tf alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "tf alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tf for the full list with editorial commentary on each.