← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

PowerTOST vs prova

A side-by-side editorial comparison of PowerTOST and prova — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

PowerTOST vs prova: at a glance

FeaturePowerTOSTprova
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.06.3
Sparks · 30d01
Top themesbioequivalence, sample-size, regulatory, pharmacometricsr-packages, bayesian-inference, decision-analysis, api-consolidation
Last editorial update19h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is PowerTOST?

A bioequivalence sample-size workhorse whose news is which regulator it now covers

PowerTOST computes power and sample size for bioequivalence and its changelog reads as a record of regulatory divergence more than statistical development. Version 1.5-3 added the Gulf Co-operation Council as a regulator setting; 1.5-4 and 1.5-6 stripped 'FDA' out of the narrow-therapeutic-index function names once China's CDE began requiring the same evaluation. The most recent release, 1.5-7, is a single fix to how nvec() splits a total sample size across sequences.

Read the full PowerTOST trajectory →

What is prova?

prova adds expected-utility calculation on top of its Bayesian inference core.

prova does Bayesian nonparametric inference in R — probabilities through Pr() and qPr(), mutual information, quantile plots. Five releases in about two weeks renamed its central argument, collapsed two plotting functions into one, and then in v2.3.0 introduced exputility() for expected utilities and their revisability, with plot() and print() methods attached from the start.

Read the full prova trajectory →

PowerTOST vs prova: editorial side-by-side

P
PowerTOST
INFRA · APIS
0.0

A bioequivalence sample-size workhorse whose news is which regulator it now covers

◆ Current state

PowerTOST computes power and sample size for bioequivalence and its changelog reads as a record of regulatory divergence more than statistical development. Version 1.5-3 added the Gulf Co-operation Council as a regulator setting; 1.5-4 and 1.5-6 stripped 'FDA' out of the narrow-therapeutic-index function names once China's CDE began requiring the same evaluation. The most recent release, 1.5-7, is a single fix to how nvec() splits a total sample size across sequences.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is in long maintenance with a widening regulatory surface: the statistical methods are settled, and releases arrive when an agency publishes a framework that can be expressed as a settings variant of an existing method. Function naming has been deliberately decoupled from any single agency, with the deprecated FDA-suffixed aliases carried for years before removal. Cadence has slowed to roughly one release every eighteen months.

◆ Prediction

The next release is most likely another regulator setting or a small fix; on the deprecation notice already given, the power.NTIDFDA()-style aliases are the obvious removal candidate.

P
prova
INFRA · APIS
6.3

prova adds expected-utility calculation on top of its Bayesian inference core.

◆ Current state

prova does Bayesian nonparametric inference in R — probabilities through Pr() and qPr(), mutual information, quantile plots. Five releases in about two weeks renamed its central argument, collapsed two plotting functions into one, and then in v2.3.0 introduced exputility() for expected utilities and their revisability, with plot() and print() methods attached from the start.

◆ Where it's heading

Two arcs run in parallel. One compresses the API: learnt= became K=, flexiplot() and plotquantiles() merged into pplot(), and omitting arguments such as Y=, X= and K= got simpler. The other extends reach — mutualinfoF() for finite-domain variates, quantile accuracy reported alongside mutual information, and now a decision-theoretic layer sitting on the inference the package already did.

◆ Prediction

exputility() shipping with print() and plot() methods matches how the probability and mutual-information classes were treated, so utilities are likely to get the same class-based handling as they mature. The notes do not say whether decision analysis extends beyond expected utility.

Alternatives to PowerTOST and prova

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either PowerTOST or prova.

See all PowerTOST alternatives → · See all prova alternatives →

Recent activity from PowerTOST and prova

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 13d agoprovaexputility() brings decision analysis into prova
  2. 20d agoprovaCumulative 2.x notes, plus hist() and mutual-information changes
  3. 23d agoprovalearnt= becomes K=; pplot() replaces two plot functions
  4. 27d agoprovaFix for pre-existing parallel clusters
  5. 28d agoprovaextraDistr dropped; mutual-information objects get a class
  6. 10mo agoPowerTOSTFix for splitting total sample size across sequences
  7. 2y agoPowerTOSTNTID functions renamed off the FDA acronym; GCC guidance in vignettes
  8. 4y agoPowerTOSTpower.NTID() aliases added; FDA-suffixed names deprecated
  9. 5y agoPowerTOSTGulf Co-operation Council added as a regulator setting
  10. 5y agoPowerTOSTMaintenance release with vignette and documentation clarifications
  11. 5y agoPowerTOSTstringsAsFactors fix for older R in a vignette example

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between PowerTOST and prova?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. prova is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is PowerTOST better than prova?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. prova is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to PowerTOST?

Top PowerTOST alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "PowerTOST alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/powertost for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to prova?

Top prova alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "prova alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/prova for the full list with editorial commentary on each.