← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

poissonreg vs webmockr

A side-by-side editorial comparison of poissonreg and webmockr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

poissonreg vs webmockr: at a glance

Featurepoissonregwebmockr
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themestidymodels, count-regression, glmnet, r-languagehttp-mocking, testing, httr2, ropensci
Last editorial update2h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is poissonreg?

poissonreg gave its models away to parsnip and kept the glue — now it just keeps glmnet honest.

poissonreg is a tidymodels extension that wires Poisson and zero-inflated count regression into the parsnip interface. Its defining event was giving up ownership: the model definition functions moved into parsnip itself, leaving this package as engine bindings and prediction plumbing. The current dev release is entirely correctness and hygiene work — glmnet predictions now default to mean counts rather than the linear predictor, and single-observation prediction works at last.

Read the full poissonreg trajectory →

What is webmockr?

The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else

webmockr intercepts HTTP requests in R tests and returns stubbed responses, and since 1.0.0 it covers all three clients that matter — httr, httr2 and crul. The releases through 2025 have been about shedding dependencies: internal R6 classes unexported in 2.1.0, crul demoted from Imports to Suggests in the same release, and the mutual dependency with vcr severed in 2.2.0. The package now installs and runs without pulling in the rest of the rOpenSci HTTP stack.

Read the full webmockr trajectory →

poissonreg vs webmockr: editorial side-by-side

P
poissonreg
ANALYTICS
0.0

poissonreg gave its models away to parsnip and kept the glue — now it just keeps glmnet honest.

◆ Current state

poissonreg is a tidymodels extension that wires Poisson and zero-inflated count regression into the parsnip interface. Its defining event was giving up ownership: the model definition functions moved into parsnip itself, leaving this package as engine bindings and prediction plumbing. The current dev release is entirely correctness and hygiene work — glmnet predictions now default to mean counts rather than the linear predictor, and single-observation prediction works at last.

◆ Where it's heading

Release cadence has collapsed from yearly to a four-year gap between 1.0.1 and the current development version, and the content has shifted from features to deduplication against parsnip — copied helper functions replaced by the upstream originals, obsolete generic registrations removed, tests migrated to the shared extension-package pattern. This is what a stabilized tidymodels satellite looks like: the interface lives upstream, and the package's job is to not drift from it.

◆ Prediction

The dev version's accumulated fixes point to a CRAN release of 1.0.2 as the next move, with content limited to the glmnet prediction corrections rather than any new engine or model type.

W
webmockr
ANALYTICS
0.0

The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else

◆ Current state

webmockr intercepts HTTP requests in R tests and returns stubbed responses, and since 1.0.0 it covers all three clients that matter — httr, httr2 and crul. The releases through 2025 have been about shedding dependencies: internal R6 classes unexported in 2.1.0, crul demoted from Imports to Suggests in the same release, and the mutual dependency with vcr severed in 2.2.0. The package now installs and runs without pulling in the rest of the rOpenSci HTTP stack.

◆ Where it's heading

Two arcs run in sequence. The first is coverage — multiple queued responses in 0.7.0, basic auth mocking, async through crul, then httr2 — building out what can be stubbed. The second, starting with 2.0.0, is correctness and independence: stubs are now deleted if an error occurs mid-construction rather than lingering half-built, partial matching arrives for bodies and queries, and the dependency graph is pruned release by release. The 2.2.0 split from vcr landed within a minute of crul's release taking mocking control into its own clients.

◆ Prediction

RequestPattern is documented as still exported in 2.1.0 but slated for removal, so the next major release is where that lands. Expect continued dependency pruning rather than new client support — the three clients that exist are already covered.

Alternatives to poissonreg and webmockr

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either poissonreg or webmockr.

See all poissonreg alternatives → · See all webmockr alternatives →

Recent activity from poissonreg and webmockr

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 3mo agopoissonregglmnet predictions now default to mean counts
  2. 1y agowebmockrvcr dependency severed
  3. 1y agowebmockrInternal classes unexported; crul becomes an optional dependency
  4. 1y agowebmockrFailed stub construction cleans up; partial matching extends to bodies and queries
  5. 2y agowebmockrhttr2 joins httr and crul as a supported client
  6. 3y agowebmockrQueued responses, body matching and integer status codes fixed
  7. 3y agowebmockrRegex URI matching fixed
  8. 3y agopoissonregDocumentation regenerated for valid HTML5
  9. 4y agopoissonregCase weight support tracks parsnip 1.0.0
  10. 4y agopoissonregModel definitions move out of poissonreg into parsnip
  11. 4y agopoissonregglm becomes the default engine; tidy() for hurdle models
  12. 5y agopoissonregFirst release, with a glmnet column-order safeguard

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between poissonreg and webmockr?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. poissonreg and webmockr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is poissonreg better than webmockr?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. poissonreg and webmockr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to poissonreg?

Top poissonreg alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "poissonreg alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/poissonreg for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to webmockr?

Top webmockr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "webmockr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/webmockr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.