midr
A black-box interpreter reaches CRAN, then learns multi-class and survival responses
Comparison · Infra & APIs
PEIMAN2 vs traumar
A side-by-side editorial comparison of PEIMAN2 and traumar — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
PEIMAN2 vs traumar: at a glance
| Feature | PEIMAN2 | traumar |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Infra & APIs | Infra & APIs |
| Velocity score | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Sparks · 30d | 0 | 0 |
| Top themes | proteomics, post-translational-modification, enrichment-analysis, reproducibility | trauma-registry, healthcare-quality, statistical-correctness, data-validation |
| Last editorial update | 1h ago | 4h ago |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
What is PEIMAN2?
PEIMAN2 cut its annotation database loose from its release cycle without breaking CRAN.
PEIMAN2 does enrichment analysis over post-translational modifications, testing whether a protein list is enriched for particular PTMs against UniProt-derived annotations, with translation functions bridging to mass spectrometry workflows. Its answers are only as current as its bundled database, and until June that database could only be refreshed by releasing a new package version. Version 1.1.0 changes that.
What is traumar?
Trauma registry statistics in R, tightening the numbers it reports against the literature.
traumar computes trauma-centre performance measures from registry data, including relative mortality metrics, SEQIC quality indicators and predicted survival probability. The recent releases are dominated by correctness rather than coverage: 1.2.5 changed how the denominator for SEQIC indicator 7 is derived so it reflects the definitive care population rather than a raw row count, and 1.2.3 realigned probability_of_survival() with published coefficients. Version 1.2.6 completes a deprecation, turning the old n_decimal argument into an error.
PEIMAN2 vs traumar: editorial side-by-side
PEIMAN2
0.0INFRA · APIS
PEIMAN2 cut its annotation database loose from its release cycle without breaking CRAN.
◆ Current state
PEIMAN2 does enrichment analysis over post-translational modifications, testing whether a protein list is enriched for particular PTMs against UniProt-derived annotations, with translation functions bridging to mass spectrometry workflows. Its answers are only as current as its bundled database, and until June that database could only be refreshed by releasing a new package version. Version 1.1.0 changes that.
◆ Where it's heading
The package has been moving from a fixed snapshot toward versioned, user-selectable data. Earlier releases updated the bundled database in place — 1.0.0 shipped the March 2025 version and said little else — which meant the annotation vintage was whatever the package version implied. Now update_peiman_database() downloads and caches external database files and UniProt PTM lists, enrichment workflows take a database_version argument, and the mass-spec translators take a ptmlist_version, so an analysis can pin a dated database rather than a package release. The CRAN-safe default is preserved deliberately: loading, examples and checks still use the bundled internal data and need no network.
◆ Prediction
Version pinning is now expressible but the release notes do not describe how a chosen version is recorded in output, so surfacing the active database version in results is the natural companion. The database and the UniProt PTM list are versioned separately, which leaves room for a combined manifest.
traumar
0.0INFRA · APIS
Trauma registry statistics in R, tightening the numbers it reports against the literature.
◆ Current state
traumar computes trauma-centre performance measures from registry data, including relative mortality metrics, SEQIC quality indicators and predicted survival probability. The recent releases are dominated by correctness rather than coverage: 1.2.5 changed how the denominator for SEQIC indicator 7 is derived so it reflects the definitive care population rather than a raw row count, and 1.2.3 realigned probability_of_survival() with published coefficients. Version 1.2.6 completes a deprecation, turning the old n_decimal argument into an error.
◆ Where it's heading
This is a package whose outputs are reported numbers, and it is behaving accordingly: the notable changes in this window alter results rather than add features. A denominator computed as a row count instead of a filtered population, and a survival calculation not matching the coefficients it cites, are both the kind of defect that quietly propagates into published figures, and both were corrected here. Around that sit in-house validation helpers written deliberately to avoid a new dependency, and a steady tidy-up of tests and tooling.
◆ Prediction
Expect the validation family introduced in 1.2.4 to be applied more widely across the package's entry points, now that it exists and is deliberately kept internal. Further SEQIC indicators being reviewed against their definitions looks likely given indicator 7 needed it, though the entries name no specific one as next.
Alternatives to PEIMAN2 and traumar
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either PEIMAN2 or traumar.
GeoThinneR
Spatial thinning grows a result object, and the API breaks to make room for it
selection.index
A dormant plant-breeding package returns as a genomic selection index suite
packageRank
CRAN download analytics maintained one micro-change at a time, hundreds per year
melodi
INSEE's statistics API gets a French R client that keeps meeting its edge cases
bulkreadr
A bulk file reader became a labelled-survey-data toolkit, then went quiet
See all PEIMAN2 alternatives → · See all traumar alternatives →
Recent activity from PEIMAN2 and traumar
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 2mo agoPEIMAN2Database updates decouple from package releases ⚡
- 3mo agotraumarn_decimal deprecation completed; percentages allow negatives
- 3mo agotraumarSEQIC indicator 7 denominator corrected to definitive care
- 6mo agotraumarIn-house validation family added to avoid a dependency
- 7mo agotraumarSurvival probability realigned with published coefficients
- 7mo agotraumarBinning and survival documentation clarified
- 1y agotraumarInternal renaming and a faster CRAN test path
- 1y agoPEIMAN2Bundled database refreshed to the March 2025 UniProt vintage
- 1y agoPEIMAN2Documentation fix for the second example dataset
- 2y agoPEIMAN2Background lists for SEA and PSEA; tidyverse dependency dropped
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between PEIMAN2 and traumar?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. PEIMAN2 and traumar are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is PEIMAN2 better than traumar?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. PEIMAN2 and traumar are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to PEIMAN2?
Top PEIMAN2 alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "PEIMAN2 alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/peiman2 for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to traumar?
Top traumar alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "traumar alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/traumar for the full list with editorial commentary on each.