modeltime
modeltime built conformal intervals in, then went quiet on features.
Comparison · Analytics
OpenMC vs tidyr
A side-by-side editorial comparison of OpenMC and tidyr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
OpenMC vs tidyr: at a glance
What is OpenMC?
OpenMC's random ray solver has gone from new arrival to the centre of every release
OpenMC is a Monte Carlo particle transport code for neutronics and radiation analysis. Since the random ray transport solver landed in 0.15.0 it has received substantial work in every subsequent release, most recently local adjoint sources, temperature and distributed-density feedback, fission-heating tallies and a weight-window bootstrapping workflow. The other consistent thread is shutdown-dose and depletion tooling, where 0.15.3 introduced an R2SManager to automate the rigorous two-step workflow and 0.16.0 extended it with reactivity control, CRAM substeps and multiple meshes.
What is tidyr?
tidyr replaced separate() with a family that says what it does.
tidyr is at 1.3.2, a collection of argument additions — fill() gains .by, expand_grid() gains .vary — and better error messages around unchop() and pivot_wider_spec(). The structural work is 1.3.0, which introduced separate_wider_delim(), separate_wider_position(), separate_wider_regex(), separate_longer_delim() and separate_longer_position() as thorough replacements for separate(), extract() and separate_rows().
OpenMC vs tidyr: editorial side-by-side
OpenMC
2.5ANALYTICS
OpenMC's random ray solver has gone from new arrival to the centre of every release
◆ Current state
OpenMC is a Monte Carlo particle transport code for neutronics and radiation analysis. Since the random ray transport solver landed in 0.15.0 it has received substantial work in every subsequent release, most recently local adjoint sources, temperature and distributed-density feedback, fission-heating tallies and a weight-window bootstrapping workflow. The other consistent thread is shutdown-dose and depletion tooling, where 0.15.3 introduced an R2SManager to automate the rigorous two-step workflow and 0.16.0 extended it with reactivity control, CRAM substeps and multiple meshes.
◆ Where it's heading
The project is layering a deterministic-adjacent solver alongside its Monte Carlo core rather than replacing it, and the ratio of random-ray work to core-solver work in each release keeps rising. In parallel it is packaging expert workflows into objects — R2SManager is the clearest case, turning a multi-stage shutdown dose calculation into a class rather than a recipe. The Python API is where most of that packaging surfaces, and it is also where the compatibility breaks land, with the minimum version moving to 3.12 in 0.16.0.
◆ Prediction
Given that every release since 0.15.0 has expanded the random ray solver's feedback and tally coverage, the next is likely to continue closing the gap between it and the main solver's feature set. The notes do not indicate whether it is intended to become a default path.
tidyr
0.0ANALYTICS
tidyr replaced separate() with a family that says what it does.
◆ Current state
tidyr is at 1.3.2, a collection of argument additions — fill() gains .by, expand_grid() gains .vary — and better error messages around unchop() and pivot_wider_spec(). The structural work is 1.3.0, which introduced separate_wider_delim(), separate_wider_position(), separate_wider_regex(), separate_longer_delim() and separate_longer_position() as thorough replacements for separate(), extract() and separate_rows().
◆ Where it's heading
Two habits define this window. Verbs are being split into explicitly named variants rather than overloaded with arguments, which is what the separate_* family does to separate(). And .by is spreading as the standard way to express grouping inline — nest(.by=) in 1.3.0, fill(.by=) in 1.3.2 — pulling users away from wrapping calls in group_by().
◆ Prediction
Given that .by has now reached fill() and nest(), the next release most likely extends the same argument to further verbs rather than reworking another function family.
Alternatives to OpenMC and tidyr
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either OpenMC or tidyr.
performance
performance keeps adding ways to check a model you have already fitted.
cmdstanpy
CmdStanPy is clearing deprecations ahead of a 2.0 it keeps announcing.
dowhy
DoWhy adds one estimation method a year and keeps its identification edge.
OpenHouse
OpenHouse is hardening the seams where table policies and jobs quietly fail.
silx
silx 3.0 moved its default Qt binding to PySide6 — a migration for everyone embedding it.
See all OpenMC alternatives → · See all tidyr alternatives →
Recent activity from OpenMC and tidyr
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 6d agoOpenMCSurface-flux tallies and PDG particle identifiers in OpenMC 0.16.0
- 7mo agotidyrfill() gains .by; expand_grid() gains .vary
- 8mo agoOpenMCR2SManager automates shutdown dose rate calculations in OpenMC 0.15.3
- 1y agoOpenMCOpenMC 0.15.2 hotfixes an MPI regression
- 1y agoOpenMCRay-traced material volumes and Phong-shaded plots in OpenMC 0.15.1
- 2y agoOpenMCOpenMC 0.15.0 introduces a random ray transport solver ⚡
- 2y agotidyrpivot_wider duplicate message uses modern syntax
- 2y agoOpenMCWeight window generation and continuous nuclide feed in OpenMC 0.14.0
- 3y agotidyrseparate_wider_* family supersedes separate() and extract()
- 3y agotidyrHot patch for R CMD check failures
- 4y agotidyrpivot_wider() gains names_expand, id_expand and unused_fn
- 4y agotidyrLarge speedups to unchop(), unnest() and expand_grid()
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between OpenMC and tidyr?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. OpenMC is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is OpenMC better than tidyr?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. OpenMC is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to OpenMC?
Top OpenMC alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "OpenMC alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/openmc for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to tidyr?
Top tidyr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "tidyr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tidyr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.