Undertow
Undertow 2.4.0 clears three CVEs and finally lands long-open HTTP/2 and timeout requests
Comparison · DevOps
Open Babel vs Pelican
A side-by-side editorial comparison of Open Babel and Pelican — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Open Babel vs Pelican: at a glance
What is Open Babel?
Six years quiet, then a feature release and a fuzzing-driven security cleanup.
Open Babel is a chemical file format conversion and cheminformatics toolkit. After 3.1.0 in 2020 the project went effectively dormant, then returned in May 2026 with 3.2.0 — a release combining real 3D geometry work with the results of a sustained fuzzing campaign run through OSS-Fuzz, with reports from Cisco TALOS, Trail of Bits, and ADA Logics. The 3.2.1 follow-up continues that: a CVE in the MMD parser, sscanf validation across several formats, and a stack overflow in the Gaussian and cube readers.
What is Pelican?
Pelican now ships roughly once a year, and 4.12 is theme housekeeping
Pelican is a mature Python static site generator in low-cadence maintenance: 4.12.0 in April 2026 followed 4.11.0 by fifteen months, which itself followed 4.10.0 by sixteen. Nearly all recent work lands in the bundled notmyidea and Simple themes, in summary generation, and in the file-watching and logging plumbing. The contributor pattern is telling — a handful of names carry most merged PRs, and the changelogs read as accumulated small fixes rather than planned feature arcs.
Open Babel vs Pelican: editorial side-by-side
Open Babel
0.0DEVOPS
Six years quiet, then a feature release and a fuzzing-driven security cleanup.
◆ Current state
Open Babel is a chemical file format conversion and cheminformatics toolkit. After 3.1.0 in 2020 the project went effectively dormant, then returned in May 2026 with 3.2.0 — a release combining real 3D geometry work with the results of a sustained fuzzing campaign run through OSS-Fuzz, with reports from Cisco TALOS, Trail of Bits, and ADA Logics. The 3.2.1 follow-up continues that: a CVE in the MMD parser, sscanf validation across several formats, and a stack overflow in the Gaussian and cube readers.
◆ Where it's heading
The project has re-engaged around two things at once — improving initial 3D structure generation, and hardening the format parsers that make Open Babel useful in the first place. Because it reads dozens of chemical file formats, often from untrusted sources, the parser surface is the attack surface, and the release notes now devote as much space to crash fixes as to chemistry. The project says more bug-fix releases are expected through 2026.
◆ Prediction
Expect continued fuzz-driven parser fixes on the 3.2.x line, since the crash reports arrive from external infrastructure rather than a roadmap.
Pelican
0.0DEVOPS
Pelican now ships roughly once a year, and 4.12 is theme housekeeping
◆ Current state
Pelican is a mature Python static site generator in low-cadence maintenance: 4.12.0 in April 2026 followed 4.11.0 by fifteen months, which itself followed 4.10.0 by sixteen. Nearly all recent work lands in the bundled notmyidea and Simple themes, in summary generation, and in the file-watching and logging plumbing. The contributor pattern is telling — a handful of names carry most merged PRs, and the changelogs read as accumulated small fixes rather than planned feature arcs.
◆ Where it's heading
The project is stable rather than growing: the last genuinely structural changes were switching the build tool to PDM and moving file watching to watchfiles back in 4.9.0, and nothing since has altered how Pelican works. Recent releases invest in making the bundled themes usable as inheritance bases — more template blocks, CSS_FILE support, dark mode — which pushes customization toward theme authors instead of core. Expect continuity, not reinvention.
◆ Prediction
The entries show no roadmap signal beyond incremental theme and Python-version support, so the next release most likely follows the same pattern: another year-scale gap, more Simple-theme inheritance hooks, and test-matrix updates for a newer Python.
Alternatives to Open Babel and Pelican
Other DevOps products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Open Babel or Pelican.
Betaflight
Betaflight grew a real autopilot: waypoint missions, geofence RTH and MAVLink ground control
OceanBase
OceanBase is rebuilding itself as a RAG backend without giving up the HTAP story
QGroundControl
QGroundControl rebuilt its flight UI around touch screens, then went quiet for ten months
WildFly
WildFly's quarterly train is really a stability ladder, and OIDC keeps climbing it
RESTEasy
Jakarta REST implementation in pure maintenance across two parallel branches.
See all Open Babel alternatives → · See all Pelican alternatives →
Recent activity from Open Babel and Pelican
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1mo agoOpen BabelOpen Babel 3.2.1
- 2mo agoOpen BabelFirst feature release in six years: L-BFGS optimizer and macrocycle ring builder ⚡
- 3mo agoPelicanPelican 4.12 adds dark mode to the default theme
- 1y agoPelicanPelican 4.11 makes Typogrify filters selectable
- 1y agoPelicanPelican 4.10.2 ignores hidden files by default
- 1y agoPelicanPelican 4.10.1 fixes live reload and theme symlinks
- 1y agoPelicanPelican 4.10 adds paragraph-count summaries and a Medium importer
- 2y agoPelicanPelican 4.9.1 fixes the tzdata dependency on Windows
- 6y agoOpen BabelPeriodic boundary conditions, distance geometry, and a WLN reader
- 6y agoOpen BabelPackaging fixes for Linux and FreeBSD
- 6y agoOpen BabelKekulization rewritten, SMILES I/O 50x faster, old babel binary removed ⚡
- 6y agoOpen BabelAlpha build to exercise the 3.0 release process
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between Open Babel and Pelican?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Open Babel and Pelican are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is Open Babel better than Pelican?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Open Babel and Pelican are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other DevOps products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to Open Babel?
Top Open Babel alternatives in DevOps are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Open Babel alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/openbabel for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to Pelican?
Top Pelican alternatives in DevOps are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Pelican alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/pelican for the full list with editorial commentary on each.