← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

nswgeo vs rempsyc

A side-by-side editorial comparison of nswgeo and rempsyc — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

nswgeo vs rempsyc: at a glance

Featurenswgeorempsyc
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesgeospatial, australia, public-health, reference-dataapa-formatting, psychology-research, statistical-tables, ggplot2
Last editorial update2h ago46m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is nswgeo?

NSW boundary data for R, refreshed as the official sources move

nswgeo packages New South Wales geographic boundaries for R — suburbs, postcodes, local government areas, Primary Health Networks and Local Health Districts — as ready-to-plot sf datasets. The 0.6.0 release refreshes nearly all of them against new upstream sources, moving postcodes to 2021 ABS boundaries and taking LHD boundaries from a new official feed. It is maintained by cidm-ph alongside the mapping packages that consume it, including ggmapinset.

Read the full nswgeo trajectory →

What is rempsyc?

Publication-ready psychology tables and plots, tracking APA style as closely as the software allows.

rempsyc produces APA-formatted tables and figures for psychology research — nice_table() for results tables, plus plotting helpers for scatter plots, violin plots, densities and simple slopes. Its releases are CRAN submissions that bundle a long run of development versions, so each entry reads as a digest rather than a single change. The most recent, 0.2.0, added point labelling and per-group correlation statistics to nice_scatter and fixed nice_lm() failing on factor covariates with more than two levels.

Read the full rempsyc trajectory →

nswgeo vs rempsyc: editorial side-by-side

N
nswgeo
ANALYTICS
0.0

NSW boundary data for R, refreshed as the official sources move

◆ Current state

nswgeo packages New South Wales geographic boundaries for R — suburbs, postcodes, local government areas, Primary Health Networks and Local Health Districts — as ready-to-plot sf datasets. The 0.6.0 release refreshes nearly all of them against new upstream sources, moving postcodes to 2021 ABS boundaries and taking LHD boundaries from a new official feed. It is maintained by cidm-ph alongside the mapping packages that consume it, including ggmapinset.

◆ Where it's heading

Every release is dictated by an upstream release calendar rather than a roadmap: the 2023 ASGS, then 2024, then the 2021 ABS postcode boundaries and the new LHD source. That makes field-name churn the package's defining hazard — LGA_NAME_2021 to LGA_NAME_2023 to LGA_NAME_2024, and now lhd_name carrying a Local Health District suffix. The maintainer's habit of registering compatibility aliases through cartographer shows an awareness that these renames break downstream code silently.

◆ Prediction

Expect the next release to track the following ASGS edition with another round of field renames, and any new content to stay in the health-geography area the package's users work in.

R
rempsyc
ANALYTICS
0.0

Publication-ready psychology tables and plots, tracking APA style as closely as the software allows.

◆ Current state

rempsyc produces APA-formatted tables and figures for psychology research — nice_table() for results tables, plus plotting helpers for scatter plots, violin plots, densities and simple slopes. Its releases are CRAN submissions that bundle a long run of development versions, so each entry reads as a digest rather than a single change. The most recent, 0.2.0, added point labelling and per-group correlation statistics to nice_scatter and fixed nice_lm() failing on factor covariates with more than two levels.

◆ Where it's heading

Two forces drive this package and neither is its own roadmap. The first is APA style: when the 7th edition advised against beta for standardized coefficients, the package switched its output to italic b with an asterisk. The second is the surrounding ecosystem — formatting is aligned to what lavaanExtra and afex produce, contrast handling was delegated to easystats' modelbased, and Excel correlation matrix export was handed entirely to the correlation package to cut maintenance.

◆ Prediction

The pattern of delegating functionality to specialist packages while keeping the formatting layer is well established and likely continues. Because releases bundle many small dev versions, the next one will probably again mix plotting refinements with fixes surfaced by upstream changes.

Alternatives to nswgeo and rempsyc

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either nswgeo or rempsyc.

See all nswgeo alternatives → · See all rempsyc alternatives →

Recent activity from nswgeo and rempsyc

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 4mo agonswgeoSuburb, postcode, PHN and LHD boundaries all refreshed
  2. 6mo agonswgeonswgeo 0.5.1
  3. 11mo agorempsycPoint labels and per-group correlations added to nice_scatter
  4. 1y agorempsycExcel correlation export delegated to the correlation package
  5. 1y agonswgeoUpdated to the 2024 ASGS release
  6. 2y agorempsycTable spacing control and a fix for name collision with afex
  7. 2y agonswgeoTerritories, PHN maps and the outline() helper added
  8. 2y agorempsycStandardized coefficients switch to APA 7th edition b* notation
  9. 2y agorempsycLegend and standardization-check fixes
  10. 2y agorempsycnice_table starts coercing model objects automatically

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between nswgeo and rempsyc?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. nswgeo and rempsyc are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is nswgeo better than rempsyc?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. nswgeo and rempsyc are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to nswgeo?

Top nswgeo alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "nswgeo alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/nswgeo for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to rempsyc?

Top rempsyc alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rempsyc alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rempsyc for the full list with editorial commentary on each.