← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

Neo4j vs yardstick

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Neo4j and yardstick — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Neo4j vs yardstick: at a glance

FeatureNeo4jyardstick
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score7.50.0
Sparks · 30d20
Top themesgraph-database, graph-data-science, free-tier, access-controlmetrics, tidymodels, fairness, survival-analysis
Last editorial update15h ago49m ago
WebsiteVisit →

What is Neo4j?

Neo4j moves its full graph algorithm catalog onto the free tier and adds attribute-based access control.

Neo4j is pushing capability downward and outward at the same time. The complete Graph Data Science catalog — 65+ algorithms — now runs on AuraDB Free in isolated, unbilled sessions, while Business Critical and Virtual Dedicated Cloud tiers gain attribute-based access control with time-windowed permissions and IdP claim mapping. Around those, the Aura platform continues its monthly cadence: Cypher 25 picked up GROUP BY and a GQL cardinality function, quantized vector search reached general availability, and the Query editor gained persistent tabs.

Read the full Neo4j trajectory →

What is yardstick?

yardstick made fairness metrics a first-class part of tidymodels evaluation

yardstick supplies the metrics tidymodels evaluates models with. Its recent history is metric expansion into areas the package did not originally cover - survival analysis, model fairness, and in 1.4.0 a batch of regression and classification metrics filling remaining gaps - alongside a long deprecation cycle that finally turned errors on in 1.4.0.

Read the full yardstick trajectory →

Neo4j vs yardstick: editorial side-by-side

N
Neo4j
ANALYTICS
7.5

Neo4j moves its full graph algorithm catalog onto the free tier and adds attribute-based access control.

◆ Current state

Neo4j is pushing capability downward and outward at the same time. The complete Graph Data Science catalog — 65+ algorithms — now runs on AuraDB Free in isolated, unbilled sessions, while Business Critical and Virtual Dedicated Cloud tiers gain attribute-based access control with time-windowed permissions and IdP claim mapping. Around those, the Aura platform continues its monthly cadence: Cypher 25 picked up GROUP BY and a GQL cardinality function, quantized vector search reached general availability, and the Query editor gained persistent tabs.

◆ Where it's heading

The shape here is a funnel. Free-tier users get the algorithm catalog and hosted MCP access with no billing and no setup, which lowers the cost of the first serious graph experiment to nothing; enterprise tiers get the governance controls that make an expansion defensible. Cypher is simultaneously being pulled toward the GQL standard and extended with new surfaces — auth rules, grouping clauses — so the query language is absorbing work that used to sit in configuration and driver code.

◆ Prediction

Expect ABAC to descend to Professional tiers and the Aura Graph Analytics free session limits to become the pressure point Neo4j uses to convert experiments into paid capacity. The unresolved question from these entries is whether MCP for Aura reaches Virtual Dedicated Cloud, which is listed as pending.

Y
yardstick
ANALYTICS
0.0

yardstick made fairness metrics a first-class part of tidymodels evaluation

◆ Current state

yardstick supplies the metrics tidymodels evaluates models with. Its recent history is metric expansion into areas the package did not originally cover - survival analysis, model fairness, and in 1.4.0 a batch of regression and classification metrics filling remaining gaps - alongside a long deprecation cycle that finally turned errors on in 1.4.0.

◆ Where it's heading

The direction is coverage plus extensibility. Rather than adding fairness metrics one at a time, 1.3.0 shipped new_groupwise_metric() so group-aware metrics can be defined for the problem at hand, which is the more durable contribution. The parallel thread is removing hidden state: the event_first global option, deprecated in 0.0.7, took until 1.4.0 to become an error.

◆ Prediction

Expect the groupwise constructor to attract more fairness definitions than the three shipped, and the developer-facing metric creation helpers deprecated in 1.2.0 to be removed next; core metric coverage now looks close to complete.

Alternatives to Neo4j and yardstick

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Neo4j or yardstick.

See all Neo4j alternatives → · See all yardstick alternatives →

Recent activity from Neo4j and yardstick

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 21h agoNeo4jAura Graph Analytics is now available on AuraDB Free
  2. 1d agoNeo4jDynamic & Time-Based Access Control with ABAC, now in Neo4j Aura!
  3. 8d agoNeo4jQuery Tabs: A new way to work with your queries
  4. 9d agoNeo4jCypher 25 gains GROUP BY; quantized vector search hits GA
  5. 13d agoNeo4jEnterprise Studio: dashboard parameters and concurrent editing
  6. 22d agoNeo4jMCP for Aura Now Available
  7. 4mo agoyardstickAdds Gini, MSE and rate metrics; old deprecations now error
  8. 1y agoyardstickAll messages translated to cli
  9. 2y agoyardstickFixes wrong weights in roc_curve_survival()
  10. 2y agoyardstickFairness metrics and a groupwise metric constructor
  11. 3y agoyardstickBrier score for classification; tidyselect interface throughout
  12. 3y agoyardstickNew maintainer; clearer metric_set() errors

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Neo4j and yardstick?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Neo4j is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 7.5 vs 0.0), with 2 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Neo4j better than yardstick?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Neo4j is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 7.5 vs 0.0), with 2 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Neo4j?

Top Neo4j alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Neo4j alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/neo4j for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to yardstick?

Top yardstick alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "yardstick alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/yardstick for the full list with editorial commentary on each.