tidytlg
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
Comparison · Analytics
nanoparquet vs riem
A side-by-side editorial comparison of nanoparquet and riem — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
nanoparquet vs riem: at a glance
What is nanoparquet?
nanoparquet is chasing byte-level agreement with the Java and Rust Parquet readers, not feature count.
nanoparquet reads and writes Parquet from R with no Arrow dependency, which is its entire reason to exist. The 0.4.0 line renamed the reader API and added schema authoring plus `append_parquet()`, and the 0.5.x releases have gone after interoperability: definition and repetition level encodings the Apache Parquet Java library expects, flatbuffer alignment the Rust arrow-rs reader expects, 128-bit decimals, and Polars-written files that omit the dictionary page offset. The newest release adds `bit64::integer64` columns and writing to stdout.
What is riem?
A weather-data client that keeps rewriting its HTTP layer while slowly tightening its API.
riem pulls observations from the Iowa Environmental Mesonet's weather-station network. Its release history is two threads: successive rewrites of the HTTP and test-mocking stack, and a gradual tightening of function arguments that culminated in 1.0.0 removing convenient-but-dangerous defaults. Contributions come partly from IEM's own maintainer.
nanoparquet vs riem: editorial side-by-side
nanoparquet
0.0ANALYTICS
nanoparquet is chasing byte-level agreement with the Java and Rust Parquet readers, not feature count.
◆ Current state
nanoparquet reads and writes Parquet from R with no Arrow dependency, which is its entire reason to exist. The 0.4.0 line renamed the reader API and added schema authoring plus `append_parquet()`, and the 0.5.x releases have gone after interoperability: definition and repetition level encodings the Apache Parquet Java library expects, flatbuffer alignment the Rust arrow-rs reader expects, 128-bit decimals, and Polars-written files that omit the dictionary page offset. The newest release adds `bit64::integer64` columns and writing to stdout.
◆ Where it's heading
Almost every entry since 0.4.0 names another engine — Java, arrow-rs, Polars, Arrow schema metadata — which tells you the maintainers are treating cross-reader fidelity as the product rather than R-side ergonomics. The type system is filling in from the edges: DECIMAL beyond 8 bytes, UUID, FLOAT16 and INTERVAL as raw lists, and now 64-bit integers with an explicit read-type option instead of a silent cast to double. Writing to `:stdout:` points at a second audience, shell pipelines rather than interactive R.
◆ Prediction
The remaining unmapped Parquet types the changelog has been parking in raw-vector lists — FLOAT16 and INTERVAL — are the obvious next targets, following the same pattern by which DECIMAL and UUID graduated to real R types.
riem
0.0ANALYTICS
A weather-data client that keeps rewriting its HTTP layer while slowly tightening its API.
◆ Current state
riem pulls observations from the Iowa Environmental Mesonet's weather-station network. Its release history is two threads: successive rewrites of the HTTP and test-mocking stack, and a gradual tightening of function arguments that culminated in 1.0.0 removing convenient-but-dangerous defaults. Contributions come partly from IEM's own maintainer.
◆ Where it's heading
The HTTP thread has moved through httr to httr2, and mocking from vcr to httptest2 — following the broader rOpenSci HTTP-stack reorganisation rather than any need of its own. The API thread runs the other way: 1.0.0 removed defaults for date_start and station and flipped latlon to FALSE, trading convenience for callers being explicit about what they request. New arguments in the same release widened what a query can ask for.
◆ Prediction
With the API stabilised at 1.0.0 and the HTTP stack settled on httr2, the next release is more likely to expose additional IEM query parameters than to change plumbing again.
Alternatives to nanoparquet and riem
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either nanoparquet or riem.
Tplyr
Tplyr made clinical summary tables explain where every number came from.
rlistings
Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.
hoardr
A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.
gigs
gigs redesigned its whole conversion API for rOpenSci, then spent three releases getting the docs to build.
datasetjson
datasetjson rebuilt its object model to track the CDISC Dataset-JSON 1.1 schema.
See all nanoparquet alternatives → · See all riem alternatives →
Recent activity from nanoparquet and riem
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 3mo agonanoparquet64-bit integer columns and writing Parquet to stdout
- 4mo agonanoparquetFiles now readable by the Java and Rust Parquet libraries
- 1y agonanoparquetReads Polars files that omit the dictionary page offset
- 1y agonanoparquetDate, FLOAT, and mixed-encoding read fixes
- 1y agonanoparquetSchema authoring and append_parquet arrive with a renamed API ⚡
- 1y agoriem1.0.0 removes defaults and adds query arguments
- 1y agoriemDrops the last vcr usage in favour of httptest2
- 1y agonanoparquetFixes a write_parquet crash
- 2y agoriemTimezone and timestamp-parsing fixes
- 4y agoriemMoves to httr2 and httptest2
- 4y agoriemSwitches to newer IEM metadata web services
- 9y agoriemReduces dependencies to tibble alone
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between nanoparquet and riem?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. nanoparquet and riem are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is nanoparquet better than riem?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. nanoparquet and riem are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to nanoparquet?
Top nanoparquet alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "nanoparquet alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/nanoparquet for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to riem?
Top riem alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "riem alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/riem for the full list with editorial commentary on each.