← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

modeldata vs rnaturalearth

A side-by-side editorial comparison of modeldata and rnaturalearth — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

modeldata vs rnaturalearth: at a glance

Featuremodeldatarnaturalearth
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themestidymodels, example-data, simulation, teaching-dataspatial-data, natural-earth, sf-migration, geopackage
Last editorial update1h ago55m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is modeldata?

The tidymodels example-data package grows one dataset at a time, on nobody's schedule

modeldata exists to supply the datasets and simulation functions that tidymodels documentation, tests, and teaching material depend on. Releases arrive roughly once or twice a year and consist almost entirely of new data sets plus occasional simulation methods. The most recent work adds a Worley (1987) regression simulation and moves the package off the magrittr pipe onto base R's.

Read the full modeldata trajectory →

What is rnaturalearth?

rnaturalearth finished its sp exit and is now optimising how the data actually arrives.

1.0.0 ended sp support outright, making sf the default and offering terra's SpatVector via `returnclass`, after 0.3.3 had signposted that with lifecycle badges. The two releases since move to delivery mechanics: 1.1.0 reads data directly out of the zip through the GDAL Virtual File System, starts moving unloaded downloads to GeoPackage instead of shapefile, and switches the base URL to naciscdn.org; 1.2.0 adds caching to `ne_download()` when `destdir` is persistent, swaps devtools for pak when installing the companion data packages, and handles Natural Earth's inconsistent raster zip layouts.

Read the full rnaturalearth trajectory →

modeldata vs rnaturalearth: editorial side-by-side

M
modeldata
ANALYTICS
0.0

The tidymodels example-data package grows one dataset at a time, on nobody's schedule

◆ Current state

modeldata exists to supply the datasets and simulation functions that tidymodels documentation, tests, and teaching material depend on. Releases arrive roughly once or twice a year and consist almost entirely of new data sets plus occasional simulation methods. The most recent work adds a Worley (1987) regression simulation and moves the package off the magrittr pipe onto base R's.

◆ Where it's heading

Two lines run through the history: broadening coverage of task types — ordinal classification, multinomial, regression, QSAR-style chemistry data — and building out synthetic simulation so tutorials can demonstrate a method without shipping a real dataset for it. The simulation side has grown from a single regression generator into a family with logistic and multinomial variants and a keep_truth option that exposes the error-free outcome. Infrastructure changes appear only when the wider tidyverse moves, as the base-pipe transition shows.

◆ Prediction

The pattern points to another simulation method or a dataset filling a task type the collection still lacks, rather than any change in what the package does.

R
rnaturalearth
ANALYTICS
0.0

rnaturalearth finished its sp exit and is now optimising how the data actually arrives.

◆ Current state

1.0.0 ended sp support outright, making sf the default and offering terra's SpatVector via `returnclass`, after 0.3.3 had signposted that with lifecycle badges. The two releases since move to delivery mechanics: 1.1.0 reads data directly out of the zip through the GDAL Virtual File System, starts moving unloaded downloads to GeoPackage instead of shapefile, and switches the base URL to naciscdn.org; 1.2.0 adds caching to `ne_download()` when `destdir` is persistent, swaps devtools for pak when installing the companion data packages, and handles Natural Earth's inconsistent raster zip layouts.

◆ Where it's heading

With the class question settled, the work has shifted to not re-downloading and not unpacking — VFS reads, caching, and a container format that does not need a sidecar of four files. That points at the package being used in repeated or automated contexts rather than interactive one-offs. The shapefile-to-GeoPackage transition is explicitly incomplete.

◆ Prediction

Completing the GeoPackage transition for `load = FALSE` downloads is the obvious next step, since 1.1.0 described it as in progress.

Alternatives to modeldata and rnaturalearth

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either modeldata or rnaturalearth.

See all modeldata alternatives → · See all rnaturalearth alternatives →

Recent activity from modeldata and rnaturalearth

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 6mo agornaturalearthrnaturalearth 1.2.0
  2. 11mo agomodeldatamodeldata 1.5.1 fixes documentation and column-name typos
  3. 1y agomodeldatamodeldata 1.5.0 adds a Worley (1987) regression simulation
  4. 1y agornaturalearthrnaturalearth 1.1.0
  5. 2y agomodeldatamodeldata 1.4.0 adds the cat_adoption data set
  6. 2y agomodeldatamodeldata 1.3.0 adds the deliveries data set
  7. 2y agornaturalearthrnaturalearth 1.0.0 drops sp for sf and terra
  8. 3y agomodeldatamodeldata 1.2.0 adds eight data sets across regression and classification
  9. 3y agornaturalearthrnaturalearth 0.3.3 deprecates sp, imports terra
  10. 3y agomodeldatamodeldata 1.1.0 adds logistic and multinomial simulation plus keep_truth

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between modeldata and rnaturalearth?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. modeldata and rnaturalearth are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is modeldata better than rnaturalearth?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. modeldata and rnaturalearth are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to modeldata?

Top modeldata alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "modeldata alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/modeldata for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to rnaturalearth?

Top rnaturalearth alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rnaturalearth alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rnaturalearth for the full list with editorial commentary on each.