← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

modelbased vs stacks

A side-by-side editorial comparison of modelbased and stacks — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

modelbased vs stacks: at a glance

Featuremodelbasedstacks
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themeseasystats, marginal-effects, contrasts, mixed-modelstidymodels, ensembling, parallel-processing, future-framework
Last editorial update1h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is modelbased?

modelbased is turning marginal effects into a full contrast grammar

modelbased computes marginal means, contrasts, and slopes from fitted models, and it ships every one to two months with a consistent shape: new comparison types, broader model support, and steady renaming toward clearer vocabulary. The recent arc runs from marginal effects inequality measures through inequality ratios to an omnibus global test and a post_process argument for multi-step comparisons. Argument names have been settled along the way, with trend becoming slope and an alias left behind.

Read the full modelbased trajectory →

What is stacks?

Model stacking in tidymodels, quietly migrating off foreach and onto future

stacks builds ensembles from tidymodels tuning results, and its release history is dominated by one long project: replacing foreach-based parallelism with the future framework. That transition completed in 1.1.0, where foreach backends began being ignored with a warning and the minimum R version rose to 4.1. Releases are infrequent and small, with the most recent being a CRAN re-submission rather than a change.

Read the full stacks trajectory →

modelbased vs stacks: editorial side-by-side

M
modelbased
ANALYTICS
0.0

modelbased is turning marginal effects into a full contrast grammar

◆ Current state

modelbased computes marginal means, contrasts, and slopes from fitted models, and it ships every one to two months with a consistent shape: new comparison types, broader model support, and steady renaming toward clearer vocabulary. The recent arc runs from marginal effects inequality measures through inequality ratios to an omnibus global test and a post_process argument for multi-step comparisons. Argument names have been settled along the way, with trend becoming slope and an alias left behind.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is building a compositional vocabulary rather than a fixed menu — contrasts of average slopes, contrasts across two numeric predictors, inequality summaries across all outcome categories, and now user-supplied post-processing of comparisons. Support quietly widens underneath, covering nestedLogit, brms finite mixtures, and offsets under population and average estimation. Plotting gets attention in proportion to how often these results are presented rather than tabulated, including collapse_by_group() for showing averaged raw data under mixed-model fits.

◆ Prediction

With post_process and omnibus tests both landed, the likely next step is making these composed comparisons easier to report — formatting or plotting methods for the multi-step results rather than new comparison types.

S
stacks
ANALYTICS
0.0

Model stacking in tidymodels, quietly migrating off foreach and onto future

◆ Current state

stacks builds ensembles from tidymodels tuning results, and its release history is dominated by one long project: replacing foreach-based parallelism with the future framework. That transition completed in 1.1.0, where foreach backends began being ignored with a warning and the minimum R version rose to 4.1. Releases are infrequent and small, with the most recent being a CRAN re-submission rather than a change.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is mature and its remaining work is compatibility rather than capability — tracking the parallelism story across tidymodels, keeping object sizes sane after butchering and reloading, and staying aligned with recipes deprecations. The augment() method added for vetiver compatibility shows the same instinct: fit into the surrounding ecosystem rather than grow independently of it. Nothing in the visible history suggests new ensembling methods are being pursued.

◆ Prediction

With the future migration finished, the next release is most likely maintenance keeping pace with tune and recipes rather than anything users would notice.

Alternatives to modelbased and stacks

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either modelbased or stacks.

See all modelbased alternatives → · See all stacks alternatives →

Recent activity from modelbased and stacks

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agomodelbasedmodelbased 0.16.0 adds post-processing and omnibus contrast tests
  2. 3mo agomodelbasedmodelbased 0.15.0 contrasts average slopes across numeric predictors
  3. 5mo agomodelbasedmodelbased 0.14.0 renames trend to slope and adds collapse_by_group()
  4. 8mo agomodelbasedmodelbased 0.13.1 adds marginal group-level estimates and as.data.frame()
  5. 11mo agomodelbasedmodelbased 0.13.0 adds inequality ratios and slope marginalization
  6. 1y agomodelbasedmodelbased 0.12.0 introduces marginal effects inequality measures
  7. 1y agostacksstacks 1.1.1 re-released to clear a CRAN check note
  8. 1y agostacksstacks 1.1.0 completes the move to future-based parallelism
  9. 2y agostacksstacks 1.0.5 fixes butchered stack size inflation
  10. 2y agostacksstacks 1.0.4 introduces future-based parallel processing
  11. 2y agostacksstacks 1.0.3 clears recipes deprecations and a type-check bug
  12. 3y agostacksstacks 1.0.2 adds an augment() method for vetiver compatibility

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between modelbased and stacks?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. modelbased and stacks are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is modelbased better than stacks?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. modelbased and stacks are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to modelbased?

Top modelbased alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "modelbased alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/modelbased for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to stacks?

Top stacks alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "stacks alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/stacks for the full list with editorial commentary on each.