mirai vs teal.modules.clinical

The async evaluation framework releases roughly monthly and moves fast at the architecture level. In 2.7.0 the dispatcher stopped being a separate process and became a thread, after its loop had already been rewritten in C inside nanonext one release earlier. The same release added an opt-in memory budget for queued task payloads and try_mirai(), which returns NULL immediately rather than blocking when that budget is exhausted.

Two threads of work run together: cutting overhead out of the task path — thread-based dispatcher, in-process transport for synchronous daemons, lower per-element dispatch cost in mirai_map() — and making the framework safe to embed in an event loop, where blocking the host R thread is not acceptable. Deployment reach is growing too, with http_config() launching remote daemons over HTTP APIs and auto-configuring for Posit Workbench. Each release pins a minimum nanonext version, so the two packages advance as one unit.

With backpressure in place but opt-in, the open question these notes leave is whether a default memory budget arrives; continued overhead reduction and Shiny-facing non-blocking paths are the safer bet.