rollupTree
The recursive-computation engine under massProps grows the accessors its consumer needed
Comparison · Infra & APIs
massProps vs traumar
A side-by-side editorial comparison of massProps and traumar — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
massProps vs traumar: at a glance
| Feature | massProps | traumar |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Infra & APIs | Infra & APIs |
| Velocity score | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Sparks · 30d | 0 | 0 |
| Top themes | systems-engineering, mass-properties, uncertainty-propagation, documentation | trauma-registry, healthcare-quality, statistical-correctness, data-validation |
| Last editorial update | 35m ago | 4h ago |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
What is massProps?
A mass-properties rollup spends a year on documentation and follows its sibling's API
massProps computes mass, centre of mass and inertia tensors — and their uncertainties — over tree-structured assemblies, the calculation systems engineers run on a spacecraft or vehicle breakdown. It sits on top of rollupTree, the same author's generic recursive-computation engine, and its most recent release exists only to adopt accessor functions that sibling added two weeks earlier.
What is traumar?
Trauma registry statistics in R, tightening the numbers it reports against the literature.
traumar computes trauma-centre performance measures from registry data, including relative mortality metrics, SEQIC quality indicators and predicted survival probability. The recent releases are dominated by correctness rather than coverage: 1.2.5 changed how the denominator for SEQIC indicator 7 is derived so it reflects the definitive care population rather than a raw row count, and 1.2.3 realigned probability_of_survival() with published coefficients. Version 1.2.6 completes a deprecation, turning the old n_decimal argument into an error.
massProps vs traumar: editorial side-by-side
massProps
0.0INFRA · APIS
A mass-properties rollup spends a year on documentation and follows its sibling's API
◆ Current state
massProps computes mass, centre of mass and inertia tensors — and their uncertainties — over tree-structured assemblies, the calculation systems engineers run on a spacecraft or vehicle breakdown. It sits on top of rollupTree, the same author's generic recursive-computation engine, and its most recent release exists only to adopt accessor functions that sibling added two weeks earlier.
◆ Where it's heading
Every release in the window is documentation, benchmarks, or keeping in step with rollupTree. The inertia tensor and radius-of-gyration uncertainty equations have been reformatted and re-explained three separate times, which suggests the hard part of this package is not the computation but making the covariance treatment legible to the engineers meant to trust it. Development effort clearly sits in the engine underneath, not here.
◆ Prediction
The pattern is unambiguous: rollupTree ships an API change and massProps follows within a fortnight. Whatever the engine does next is what appears here next, and on this evidence it will arrive as a one-line release note.
traumar
0.0INFRA · APIS
Trauma registry statistics in R, tightening the numbers it reports against the literature.
◆ Current state
traumar computes trauma-centre performance measures from registry data, including relative mortality metrics, SEQIC quality indicators and predicted survival probability. The recent releases are dominated by correctness rather than coverage: 1.2.5 changed how the denominator for SEQIC indicator 7 is derived so it reflects the definitive care population rather than a raw row count, and 1.2.3 realigned probability_of_survival() with published coefficients. Version 1.2.6 completes a deprecation, turning the old n_decimal argument into an error.
◆ Where it's heading
This is a package whose outputs are reported numbers, and it is behaving accordingly: the notable changes in this window alter results rather than add features. A denominator computed as a row count instead of a filtered population, and a survival calculation not matching the coefficients it cites, are both the kind of defect that quietly propagates into published figures, and both were corrected here. Around that sit in-house validation helpers written deliberately to avoid a new dependency, and a steady tidy-up of tests and tooling.
◆ Prediction
Expect the validation family introduced in 1.2.4 to be applied more widely across the package's entry points, now that it exists and is deliberately kept internal. Further SEQIC indicators being reviewed against their definitions looks likely given indicator 7 needed it, though the entries name no specific one as next.
Alternatives to massProps and traumar
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either massProps or traumar.
writeAlizer
Six months of releases and not one of them touched the scoring models
samplr
A cognitive-science sampling package ships once, then goes quiet for eighteen months
stochvol
A Bayesian volatility sampler in its maintenance decade, paying for its own speed
midr
A black-box interpreter reaches CRAN, then learns multi-class and survival responses
GeoThinneR
Spatial thinning grows a result object, and the API breaks to make room for it
See all massProps alternatives → · See all traumar alternatives →
Recent activity from massProps and traumar
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 3mo agotraumarn_decimal deprecation completed; percentages allow negatives
- 3mo agotraumarSEQIC indicator 7 denominator corrected to definitive care
- 6mo agomassPropsSwitched to rollupTree's new row accessors
- 6mo agotraumarIn-house validation family added to avoid a dependency
- 6mo agomassPropsError in the inertia tensor uncertainty documentation
- 7mo agotraumarSurvival probability realigned with published coefficients
- 7mo agotraumarBinning and survival documentation clarified
- 1y agotraumarInternal renaming and a faster CRAN test path
- 1y agomassPropsBenchmark results and equation layout cleaned up
- 1y agomassPropsCombine functions given consistent formal parameters
- 1y agomassPropsExamples shrunk to fit CRAN runtime limits
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between massProps and traumar?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. massProps and traumar are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is massProps better than traumar?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. massProps and traumar are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to massProps?
Top massProps alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "massProps alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/massprops for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to traumar?
Top traumar alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "traumar alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/traumar for the full list with editorial commentary on each.