← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

maplegend vs sdtm.oak

A side-by-side editorial comparison of maplegend and sdtm.oak — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

maplegend vs sdtm.oak: at a glance

Featuremaplegendsdtm.oak
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themescartography, legends, base-graphics, spatialclinical-trials, sdtm, pharmaverse, r-package
Last editorial update1h ago2h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is maplegend?

The legend engine mapsf spun out, now covering legend types the parent map package can draw.

maplegend draws the legends for base-R thematic maps, extracted from mapsf so both packages could evolve the legend vocabulary independently. It has been catching up to the map types it has to serve: 0.6.0 added choro_point, choro_line, and choro_symb for choropleth legends rendered on circles, lines, and symbols, following the histogram legend type in 0.4.0. Considerable effort has gone into behaving correctly when the plot aspect ratio is not 1, which required refactoring most of the package in 0.4.0 and still produced a proportional-symbol segment sizing fix in 0.6.3.

Read the full maplegend trajectory →

What is sdtm.oak?

Two releases in, the open-source SDTM toolkit now covers the domains it originally excluded.

sdtm.oak builds SDTM datasets — the tabulation standard clinical trial submissions are filed in — from raw collected data. The 0.1.0 release shipped the mapping algorithm functions and derived-variable helpers but explicitly excluded DM, trial design domains, and several others. Version 0.2.0 closes the largest of those gaps, adding DM domain support via calc_min_max_date() and oak_calc_ref_dates(), plus generate_sdtm_supp() for supplemental qualifier domains.

Read the full sdtm.oak trajectory →

maplegend vs sdtm.oak: editorial side-by-side

M
maplegend
ANALYTICS
0.0

The legend engine mapsf spun out, now covering legend types the parent map package can draw.

◆ Current state

maplegend draws the legends for base-R thematic maps, extracted from mapsf so both packages could evolve the legend vocabulary independently. It has been catching up to the map types it has to serve: 0.6.0 added choro_point, choro_line, and choro_symb for choropleth legends rendered on circles, lines, and symbols, following the histogram legend type in 0.4.0. Considerable effort has gone into behaving correctly when the plot aspect ratio is not 1, which required refactoring most of the package in 0.4.0 and still produced a proportional-symbol segment sizing fix in 0.6.3.

◆ Where it's heading

This is a support library whose backlog is defined by its caller. Every legend type mapsf can produce needs a matching legend renderer, and the release notes are dominated by spacing, offset, and border details — box_cex for symbol spacing, NA box placement in horizontal choropleth legends, text overflow when no_data is set. The shared vocabulary with mapsf is being maintained deliberately, with val_rnd, val_big, and val_dec propagating through legend types release by release. Version numbering is not monotonic in this feed, with 0.4.0 published seconds after 0.5.0.

◆ Prediction

Expect the remaining combined map types to acquire matching legends and the val_* formatting arguments to reach the types that still lack them.

S
sdtm.oak
ANALYTICS
0.0

Two releases in, the open-source SDTM toolkit now covers the domains it originally excluded.

◆ Current state

sdtm.oak builds SDTM datasets — the tabulation standard clinical trial submissions are filed in — from raw collected data. The 0.1.0 release shipped the mapping algorithm functions and derived-variable helpers but explicitly excluded DM, trial design domains, and several others. Version 0.2.0 closes the largest of those gaps, adding DM domain support via calc_min_max_date() and oak_calc_ref_dates(), plus generate_sdtm_supp() for supplemental qualifier domains.

◆ Where it's heading

This is the pharmaverse pattern of building submission tooling in the open, one domain class at a time, with the release history running through GitHub release-candidate tags before each CRAN submission. The direction is clear from the domain checklist: start with the mechanically simple Findings and Events domains, then work toward the ones with cross-dataset dependencies. DM and SUPP were the two that most often forced teams back to bespoke code.

◆ Prediction

The remaining exclusions from the 0.1.0 scope — trial design domains, SV, SE, RELREC and the EPOCH variable — are the obvious next targets, with EPOCH likely first since it depends on the reference dates 0.2.0 just added. Expect the same rhythm of release candidates ahead of each CRAN submission.

Alternatives to maplegend and sdtm.oak

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either maplegend or sdtm.oak.

See all maplegend alternatives → · See all sdtm.oak alternatives →

Recent activity from maplegend and sdtm.oak

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 2mo agomaplegendContinuous legend formatting and aspect-ratio segment fix
  2. 4mo agomaplegendChoropleth legends on points, lines and symbols
  3. 7mo agomaplegendPackage-wide refactor for non-unity aspect ratios, histogram legends
  4. 7mo agomaplegendSingle-modality legends allowed for typo, symb and prop_line
  5. 1y agomaplegendAlpha transparency and redraw on device resize
  6. 1y agomaplegendOffset and symbol sizing aligned with mapsf
  7. 1y agosdtm.oaksdtm.oak v0.2.0 CRAN release
  8. 1y agosdtm.oaksdtm.oak v0.1.1 CRAN release
  9. 1y agosdtm.oaksdtm.oak v0.1.0 CRAN release
  10. 1y agosdtm.oakv0.1.0rc4: [skip vbump] 90 cran comments (#91)
  11. 2y agosdtm.oakv0.1.0rc2: Fix CRAN Comments (#84)
  12. 2y agosdtm.oakv0.1.0: [skip vbump] Bump version for cran release (#77)

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between maplegend and sdtm.oak?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. maplegend and sdtm.oak are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is maplegend better than sdtm.oak?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. maplegend and sdtm.oak are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to maplegend?

Top maplegend alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "maplegend alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/maplegend for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to sdtm.oak?

Top sdtm.oak alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "sdtm.oak alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/sdtm-oak for the full list with editorial commentary on each.