← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

mantis vs OpenCTI

A side-by-side editorial comparison of mantis and OpenCTI — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

mantis vs OpenCTI: at a glance

FeaturemantisOpenCTI
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.06.3
Sparks · 30d00
Top themestime-series, reporting, ropensci, api-stabilitythreat-intelligence, stix, data-model, ingestion
Last editorial update4d ago16h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is mantis?

Thirteen months of rOpenSci review turned a pre-release into a 1.0 with a stable API

mantis builds interactive time-series reports — heatmaps, multipanel plots, alert tables — over routinely collected data, and its release history is essentially an rOpenSci peer-review log. The package went from a January 2025 pre-release that warned of breaking changes ahead, through submission and CRAN acceptance, to a 1.0.0 in October 2025 that locked the API. Since then it has shipped only two small fixes, the most recent chasing a dplyr 1.2.0 deprecation.

Read the full mantis trajectory →

What is OpenCTI?

OpenCTI spends a release unblocking queues and hardening upserts

7.260817.0 is a fix release. The most consequential item is malformed STIX messages nacking forever and blocking worker queues indefinitely — a stall in the ingestion path rather than a display bug. Alongside it: upsert clearing an existing createdBy when incoming confidence is higher, draft upserts crashing on existing attack patterns, OTP handling in the stream middleware, and case template relation authorization. Score fields were added to threat actor groups, intrusion sets and malware.

Read the full OpenCTI trajectory →

mantis vs OpenCTI: editorial side-by-side

M
mantis
ANALYTICS
0.0

Thirteen months of rOpenSci review turned a pre-release into a 1.0 with a stable API

◆ Current state

mantis builds interactive time-series reports — heatmaps, multipanel plots, alert tables — over routinely collected data, and its release history is essentially an rOpenSci peer-review log. The package went from a January 2025 pre-release that warned of breaking changes ahead, through submission and CRAN acceptance, to a 1.0.0 in October 2025 that locked the API. Since then it has shipped only two small fixes, the most recent chasing a dplyr 1.2.0 deprecation.

◆ Where it's heading

The breaking changes cluster entirely below 1.0.0 and stop there: `period` became `timepoint_unit`, `save_directory`/`save_filename` became `file`, `function_call` became `expression`. Post-1.0 the work is defensive — stricter POSIXt validation, timepoint limits that clamp to the data rather than inventing plot points, daylight-savings handling. The feed reads as a package that has finished defining itself and is now maintaining compatibility with the tidyverse underneath it.

◆ Prediction

With the API frozen and review complete, expect the next release to be another upstream-compatibility fix rather than new report types. There is no signal in these entries about planned feature work.

O
OpenCTI
ANALYTICS
6.3

OpenCTI spends a release unblocking queues and hardening upserts

◆ Current state

7.260817.0 is a fix release. The most consequential item is malformed STIX messages nacking forever and blocking worker queues indefinitely — a stall in the ingestion path rather than a display bug. Alongside it: upsert clearing an existing createdBy when incoming confidence is higher, draft upserts crashing on existing attack patterns, OTP handling in the stream middleware, and case template relation authorization. Score fields were added to threat actor groups, intrusion sets and malware.

◆ Where it's heading

The platform's feature energy went into the connector catalog and integrations rework in July, and the releases since have been consolidating: mass operations on relation times, shareable saved searches, and now a pass over ingestion robustness. Adding score to more entity types continues the slow enrichment of the data model that runs underneath the feature work.

◆ Prediction

Given score arriving on three entity types in one release, expect it to keep spreading across the data model, and the queue-blocking class of bug to draw more worker-side hardening.

Alternatives to mantis and OpenCTI

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either mantis or OpenCTI.

See all mantis alternatives → · See all OpenCTI alternatives →

Recent activity from mantis and OpenCTI

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1d agoOpenCTIMalformed STIX no longer blocks worker queues indefinitely
  2. 4d agoOpenCTILTS branch gets the security backport: access-scoped streams, dependency sweep
  3. 7d agoOpenCTIMass operations can now edit relation start and stop times
  4. 11d agoOpenCTISaved searches and dashboard filters become shareable and reusable
  5. 15d agoOpenCTIData sanity operations can be stopped mid-run
  6. 20d agoOpenCTIIntegrations experience reworked around the new catalog, plus draft approval workflows
  7. 6mo agomantisdplyr 1.2.0 compatibility fix
  8. 7mo agomantisrOpenSci acceptance, plus an NA timepoint-limit fix
  9. 9mo agomantis1.0.0 locks the API and tightens timepoint handling
  10. 1y agomantisBespoke reports return to the CRAN build
  11. 1y agomantisFirst CRAN submission, standard reports only
  12. 1y agomantisrOpenSci submission; period renamed to timepoint_unit

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between mantis and OpenCTI?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. OpenCTI is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is mantis better than OpenCTI?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. OpenCTI is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to mantis?

Top mantis alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "mantis alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/mantis for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to OpenCTI?

Top OpenCTI alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "OpenCTI alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/opencti for the full list with editorial commentary on each.