exametrika
A test-theory package that grew into a graphical-model toolkit, now spending its releases paying down the API debt that growth created.
Comparison · Infra & APIs
MachineShop vs projoint
A side-by-side editorial comparison of MachineShop and projoint — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:r-package
MachineShop vs projoint: at a glance
What is MachineShop?
A mature R modelling framework refining variable importance and resampling controls
MachineShop provides a unified interface over a wide set of R model packages, handling fitting, resampling, performance metrics and variable importance behind one API. Recent releases are narrow and mostly corrective: 3.9.2 removed dead documentation links and fixed a Java parameter in a BART example, 3.9.1 ensured global settings reach compute nodes when varimp() runs in parallel and patched XGBoost model compatibility. The last release with real surface change was 3.9.0, which added offset support to XGBModel and a pool argument to calibration() controlling whether calibration curves are computed on pooled predictions or averaged across resampling iterations.
What is projoint?
projoint spent a year on CRAN paperwork, then shipped a correctness fix it flagged itself.
projoint is an R package for analysing conjoint survey experiments, covering Qualtrics import, reshaping, and quantity-of-interest estimation with inter-rater reliability correction. Most of its release history is CRAN admission work — citation formats, DESCRIPTION fields, \value{} tags, vignette cleanups — with four tags backfilled within ninety seconds of each other on 15 July in non-monotonic version order, so neither tag order nor timestamps in this feed track the real sequence. The substantive releases are the ones fixing data-preparation bugs that silently corrupt estimates.
MachineShop vs projoint: editorial side-by-side
MachineShop
0.0INFRA · APIS
A mature R modelling framework refining variable importance and resampling controls
◆ Current state
MachineShop provides a unified interface over a wide set of R model packages, handling fitting, resampling, performance metrics and variable importance behind one API. Recent releases are narrow and mostly corrective: 3.9.2 removed dead documentation links and fixed a Java parameter in a BART example, 3.9.1 ensured global settings reach compute nodes when varimp() runs in parallel and patched XGBoost model compatibility. The last release with real surface change was 3.9.0, which added offset support to XGBModel and a pool argument to calibration() controlling whether calibration curves are computed on pooled predictions or averaged across resampling iterations.
◆ Where it's heading
Development has concentrated on variable importance and resampling rather than on adding models. 3.8.0 restructured the VariableImportance class to record which method and metric produced it, with an update() method to migrate objects from earlier versions, and extended term-specific p-values to Cox, POLR and survival regression models. 3.7.0 added grouped and stratified resampling to the control objects. The pace has slowed markedly - four releases in the last two years against six in the two before - and the recent content is compatibility work against XGBoost, parsnip, ggplot2 and recipes.
◆ Prediction
Expect the deprecated calibration pooling behaviour to be removed in a future release as the notes state, with the intervening versions continuing to track upstream model package changes.
projoint
2.5INFRA · APIS
projoint spent a year on CRAN paperwork, then shipped a correctness fix it flagged itself.
◆ Current state
projoint is an R package for analysing conjoint survey experiments, covering Qualtrics import, reshaping, and quantity-of-interest estimation with inter-rater reliability correction. Most of its release history is CRAN admission work — citation formats, DESCRIPTION fields, \value{} tags, vignette cleanups — with four tags backfilled within ninety seconds of each other on 15 July in non-monotonic version order, so neither tag order nor timestamps in this feed track the real sequence. The substantive releases are the ones fixing data-preparation bugs that silently corrupt estimates.
◆ Where it's heading
The maintainer is hardening the path from raw Qualtrics export to estimate, which is where conjoint analysis quietly goes wrong. Three separate releases fix that path: dropped respondent-level weights in organize_data(), repeated-task reshaping in reshape_projoint(), and choice-to-profile mapping in 1.1.3. Each fix now arrives with regression tests and stricter validation rather than just a patch, and 1.1.3 adds an explicit .choice_map so the mapping is auditable instead of inferred.
◆ Prediction
Expect the validation-and-regression-test pattern to keep extending across the import path, with releases continuing to arrive in bursts around CRAN submission rather than on a cadence.
Alternatives to MachineShop and projoint
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either MachineShop or projoint.
nuggets
nuggets keeps compounding on the 2.0 rewrite — more pattern families, lighter install.
eratosthenes
eratosthenes spends 0.1.0 hardening inputs rather than adding chronology methods.
dqcheckr
dqcheckr adds drift analysis, then removes the YAML a user had to hand-write.
lifecontingencies
An actuarial mainstay spends its releases on CI plumbing, not on new mathematics.
EDAForge
EDAForge is a data-quality auditor renamed mid-flight, still finding its CRAN footing.
See all MachineShop alternatives → · See all projoint alternatives →
Recent activity from MachineShop and projoint
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 17d agoprojointExplicit .choice_map guards choice-to-profile mapping
- 1mo agoprojointCRAN submission housekeeping for DESCRIPTION and examples
- 1mo agoprojointCRAN formatting pass; minor make_projoint_data() fix
- 1mo agoprojointreshape_projoint() repeated-task bug fixed; validation tightened
- 1mo agoprojointCitation metadata updated with the CRAN DOI
- 5mo agoMachineShopDocumentation link cleanup and a BART example fix
- 5mo agoprojointorganize_data() no longer drops respondent-level weights
- 8mo agoMachineShopGlobal settings now reach compute nodes during parallel varimp
- 1y agoMachineShopOffset support for XGBoost and per-iteration calibration curves
- 1y agoMachineShopVariable importance objects record their own method and metric
- 2y agoMachineShopGrouped and stratified resampling in the control objects
- 3y agoMachineShopBackward compatibility for older model objects
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between MachineShop and projoint?
Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Infra & APIs. projoint is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is MachineShop better than projoint?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. projoint is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to MachineShop?
Top MachineShop alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "MachineShop alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/machineshop for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to projoint?
Top projoint alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "projoint alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/projoint for the full list with editorial commentary on each.