STACAS
Single-cell batch correction that learned to use cell labels, then spent three releases chasing Seurat.
Comparison · Analytics
lstar vs TidyDensity
A side-by-side editorial comparison of lstar and TidyDensity — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
lstar vs TidyDensity: at a glance
What is lstar?
A single-cell data store commits to Zarr v3 and range-readable hosting across four language surfaces
lstar stores single-cell data behind one C++ core with Python, R and JS/WASM bindings, and ships a browser viewer that reads the store directly. Zarr v3 is now the default on-disk format across all four surfaces, with zstd compression and sharding that packs many chunks into fewer objects. Viewer stores are compressed per field and resolved at chunk granularity, so a hosted viewer fetches only what it displays. The tag stream carries both lstar and lstar-sc releases.
What is TidyDensity?
A distribution catalogue that grows by one family at a time, and rarely breaks anything.
TidyDensity generates tidy-format random data from statistical distributions, with parameter estimation, AIC calculation, summary tables and automatic plotting for each one. Its releases follow a fixed template — breaking changes, new features, minor fixes — and the breaking section is usually empty. Growth comes distribution by distribution: Bernoulli, Burr, triangular, chi-square, zero-truncated negative binomial and others each arrive with a matching set of param_estimate, aic and stats_tbl helpers.
lstar vs TidyDensity: editorial side-by-side
lstar
5.0ANALYTICS
A single-cell data store commits to Zarr v3 and range-readable hosting across four language surfaces
◆ Current state
lstar stores single-cell data behind one C++ core with Python, R and JS/WASM bindings, and ships a browser viewer that reads the store directly. Zarr v3 is now the default on-disk format across all four surfaces, with zstd compression and sharding that packs many chunks into fewer objects. Viewer stores are compressed per field and resolved at chunk granularity, so a hosted viewer fetches only what it displays. The tag stream carries both lstar and lstar-sc releases.
◆ Where it's heading
The through-line is making a hosted store cheap to read. Sharding addresses the file-per-chunk explosion that makes many-chunk arrays awkward to host; per-field compression with chunk-granular resolution means colouring an embedding by one gene fetches one column rather than an array. The 0.2.x patches are the cost of maintaining four surfaces at once — a WASM heap crash that only browsers exercise, and a count-basis orientation defect where all three surfaces normalized in memory and none owned the on-disk layout.
◆ Prediction
The orientation bug's root cause — no surface owning the on-disk representation while all three normalized in memory — is the kind of gap that usually produces a validation or ownership change rather than another point fix.
TidyDensity
0.0ANALYTICS
A distribution catalogue that grows by one family at a time, and rarely breaks anything.
◆ Current state
TidyDensity generates tidy-format random data from statistical distributions, with parameter estimation, AIC calculation, summary tables and automatic plotting for each one. Its releases follow a fixed template — breaking changes, new features, minor fixes — and the breaking section is usually empty. Growth comes distribution by distribution: Bernoulli, Burr, triangular, chi-square, zero-truncated negative binomial and others each arrive with a matching set of param_estimate, aic and stats_tbl helpers.
◆ Where it's heading
The package is filling out a matrix rather than changing shape — every new distribution gets the same four or five companion functions, so the surface grows predictably and the design does not. What variation exists comes from utilities that work across distributions: MCMC sampling, bootstrap helpers, time series conversion, distribution comparison. The two genuine breaking changes in this window were both internal reworks, moving generation onto data.table and rewriting quantile normalization for speed.
◆ Prediction
The established pattern of adding a distribution with its full helper set is the most likely continuation. Recent releases have been small, suggesting the catalogue is approaching the distributions its author considers worth covering.
Alternatives to lstar and TidyDensity
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either lstar or TidyDensity.
ggtrace
A debugger for ggplot2's internals, hardening its grip as the internals it traces keep moving.
kde1d
A univariate density estimator that added zero-inflated data and reopened its C++ API to do it.
svines
Stationary vine copulas for time series, released in lockstep with the rest of Nagler's vine stack.
gghighlight
A single-purpose ggplot2 extension that has spent six years tracking ggplot2 instead of growing.
rtrek
A Star Trek data package that became a Memory Alpha web client and has been patching scrapers ever since.
See all lstar alternatives → · See all TidyDensity alternatives →
Recent activity from lstar and TidyDensity
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 21d agolstarViewer count-basis orientation fixed; existing stores need re-prep
- 26d agolstarWASM viewer crash on resizable heaps fixed
- 1mo agolstarlstar 0.2.0 ⚡
- 1mo agolstarMeasure state inferred from content, not slot name
- 11mo agoTidyDensityquantile_normalize rewritten, changing its output
- 1y agoTidyDensityDocumentation corrections for two distribution functions
- 2y agoTidyDensityZero-truncated distributions and AIC helpers added in bulk
- 2y agoTidyDensityMCMC sampling and quantile normalization join the utilities
- 2y agoTidyDensityGeneration moves to data.table; native pipe raises the R floor
- 2y agoTidyDensityDistributions convertible to time series objects
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between lstar and TidyDensity?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. lstar is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is lstar better than TidyDensity?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. lstar is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to lstar?
Top lstar alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "lstar alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/lstar for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to TidyDensity?
Top TidyDensity alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "TidyDensity alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tidydensity for the full list with editorial commentary on each.