← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

loo vs workflows

A side-by-side editorial comparison of loo and workflows — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

loo vs workflows: at a glance

Featurelooworkflows
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score2.50.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesbayesian, cross-validation, stan, r-statstidymodels, pipelines, postprocessing, sparse-data
Last editorial update1h ago48m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is loo?

loo keeps rewriting the diagnostics Bayesian modellers read off model comparison

loo computes leave-one-out cross-validation and model comparison for Bayesian models in the Stan ecosystem. Two releases in this window changed what users actually read: 2.7.0 replaced the fixed Pareto-k thresholds with sample-size-dependent ones and dropped the middle category, and 2.10.0 reshaped loo_compare's output into a data.frame with new uncertainty columns. The releases between are diagnostic robustness fixes and moment-matching corrections.

Read the full loo trajectory →

What is workflows?

The tidymodels pipeline grew a third stage, and it happens after the model runs.

workflows bundles a preprocessor and a model into one object that tidymodels can fit, tune and extract from. Version 1.3.0 added a post stage backed by the tailor package, wired through every generic a workflow supports — augment, tidy, tunable, tune_args, required_pkgs and parameter extraction. Version 1.2.0 added sparse data support so fit() and predict() accept dgCMatrix and sparse tibbles. Earlier releases in view are boundary tightening: erroring on unknown model modes, on trained recipes, and on silently ignored formula offsets.

Read the full workflows trajectory →

loo vs workflows: editorial side-by-side

L
loo
ANALYTICS
2.5

loo keeps rewriting the diagnostics Bayesian modellers read off model comparison

◆ Current state

loo computes leave-one-out cross-validation and model comparison for Bayesian models in the Stan ecosystem. Two releases in this window changed what users actually read: 2.7.0 replaced the fixed Pareto-k thresholds with sample-size-dependent ones and dropped the middle category, and 2.10.0 reshaped loo_compare's output into a data.frame with new uncertainty columns. The releases between are diagnostic robustness fixes and moment-matching corrections.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is being brought in line with the current PSIS literature rather than extended with new features, and the practical effect is that the numbers practitioners quote in papers keep changing meaning. Work is increasingly delegated to posterior for shared computations, and the project has added contributor process, benchmarks and a published AI contribution policy.

◆ Prediction

Expect further work on comparison diagnostics — the p_worse and diag_* columns are new enough that their defaults and documentation will likely be revised next.

W
workflows
ANALYTICS
0.0

The tidymodels pipeline grew a third stage, and it happens after the model runs.

◆ Current state

workflows bundles a preprocessor and a model into one object that tidymodels can fit, tune and extract from. Version 1.3.0 added a post stage backed by the tailor package, wired through every generic a workflow supports — augment, tidy, tunable, tune_args, required_pkgs and parameter extraction. Version 1.2.0 added sparse data support so fit() and predict() accept dgCMatrix and sparse tibbles. Earlier releases in view are boundary tightening: erroring on unknown model modes, on trained recipes, and on silently ignored formula offsets.

◆ Where it's heading

The object is filling out into a complete pipeline description rather than a preprocessing-plus-model pair. Postprocessing is the structural addition — calibration and threshold selection were previously done by hand after prediction, outside anything tidymodels could tune or record — and the fact that it arrived integrated with tunable() and tune_args() rather than as a standalone step is the point. The rest of the arc is the steady tidymodels habit of converting silent guesses into errors.

◆ Prediction

Expect tailor postprocessors to spread through tune and workflowsets next, since the parameter and tuning generics were wired up first, and expect sparse support to extend to more engines after lightgbm.

Alternatives to loo and workflows

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either loo or workflows.

See all loo alternatives → · See all workflows alternatives →

Recent activity from loo and workflows

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 20d agoloopsis_smooth_tail revert and simplify arg restored
  2. 1mo agolooloo_compare returns a data.frame with new uncertainty columns
  3. 7mo agolooStacking overflow fixes and posterior-based ESS
  4. 11mo agoworkflowsWorkflows gain a postprocessing stage via tailor
  5. 1y agoworkflowsSparse matrices work through fit() and predict()
  6. 2y agolooMore robust Pareto-k diagnostics and moment matching
  7. 2y agolooPareto-k thresholds now depend on sample size
  8. 2y agoworkflowsaugment() aligns with parsnip; censored regression supported
  9. 3y agolooLOO predictive metrics and CRPS scoring functions
  10. 3y agoworkflowsRegister tuning generics unconditionally
  11. 3y agoworkflowsMissing parsnip extensions now error early; unsupervised specs supported
  12. 3y agoworkflowsMode guessing removed; silent offset handling now errors

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between loo and workflows?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. loo is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is loo better than workflows?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. loo is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to loo?

Top loo alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "loo alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/loo for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to workflows?

Top workflows alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "workflows alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/workflows-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.