← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

lineup2 vs spatstat.model

A side-by-side editorial comparison of lineup2 and spatstat.model — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

lineup2 vs spatstat.model: at a glance

Featurelineup2spatstat.model
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.02.5
Sparks · 30d00
Top themessample-mixups, distance-metrics, r-package, bioinformaticsspatial-statistics, point-processes, model-fitting, r-package
Last editorial update48m ago4h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is lineup2?

lineup2 ships once every few years, and 2026's release is a logo and a core-count tweak.

lineup2 provides distance-based tools for detecting sample mix-ups between related datasets — comparing rows and columns of two matrices to find swapped or mislabeled samples. Its visible history is four releases spread across six years, and the capability surface has barely moved since plot_sample() and the propdiff distance arrived in 0.4. Version 0.8 in July 2026 adds a package logo and redefines cores=0 to mean all-but-one core.

Read the full lineup2 trajectory →

What is spatstat.model?

spatstat's inference layer builds out determinantal and cluster process fitting

spatstat.model fits point process models and provides the diagnostics that go with them. The recent window is dominated by determinantal point process work — a variance-covariance matrix and more diagnostics in 3.7-2, additional `intensity` and `repul` methods in 3.7-1, and ROC curves for determinantal models in 3.5-0. Cluster and Cox process inference has advanced in parallel, with Waagepetersen's composite likelihood arriving in 3.6-1.

Read the full spatstat.model trajectory →

lineup2 vs spatstat.model: editorial side-by-side

L
lineup2
ANALYTICS
0.0

lineup2 ships once every few years, and 2026's release is a logo and a core-count tweak.

◆ Current state

lineup2 provides distance-based tools for detecting sample mix-ups between related datasets — comparing rows and columns of two matrices to find swapped or mislabeled samples. Its visible history is four releases spread across six years, and the capability surface has barely moved since plot_sample() and the propdiff distance arrived in 0.4. Version 0.8 in July 2026 adds a package logo and redefines cores=0 to mean all-but-one core.

◆ Where it's heading

This is a finished, single-purpose package in maintenance. The substantive changes across the whole window are plotting conveniences and one parallelism default; nothing in the entries points at new distance measures, new input formats, or expanded scope. The release cadence — five years between 0.6 and 0.8 — reads as a tool the author considers done.

◆ Prediction

Further releases are likely to stay small: a plotting option, a parallelism detail, or a check-farm fix. The entries give no signal of planned feature work.

S2.5

spatstat's inference layer builds out determinantal and cluster process fitting

◆ Current state

spatstat.model fits point process models and provides the diagnostics that go with them. The recent window is dominated by determinantal point process work — a variance-covariance matrix and more diagnostics in 3.7-2, additional `intensity` and `repul` methods in 3.7-1, and ROC curves for determinantal models in 3.5-0. Cluster and Cox process inference has advanced in parallel, with Waagepetersen's composite likelihood arriving in 3.6-1.

◆ Where it's heading

The pattern is that model classes enter the package as fitting machinery first and only later gain the apparatus that makes them usable in practice — standard errors, diagnostics, residuals, model checking. Determinantal processes are visibly midway through that progression, reaching variance-covariance estimation only in the most recent release. Around this, the package has been broadening where models can be fitted at all: replicated point patterns on linear networks in 3.5-0, extended spatial logistic regression, and conversion of recursively partitioned models to tessellations.

◆ Prediction

Expect determinantal model support to keep filling out along the same path other model classes took, since variance estimation has only just arrived and partial residuals already exist for the cluster and Cox families. The entries do not signal a move into three dimensions here, unlike the geometry and simulation packages.

Alternatives to lineup2 and spatstat.model

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either lineup2 or spatstat.model.

See all lineup2 alternatives → · See all spatstat.model alternatives →

Recent activity from lineup2 and spatstat.model

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 18d agospatstat.modelVariance-covariance and diagnostics for determinantal models
  2. 1mo agolineup2cores=0 now leaves one core free
  3. 2mo agospatstat.modelMore intensity and repul methods; boundary-aware predictions
  4. 6mo agospatstat.modelComposite likelihood for cluster processes
  5. 8mo agospatstat.modelReplicated network models and partial residuals
  6. 10mo agospatstat.modelintensity.ppm improvements for Geyer models
  7. 1y agospatstat.modelROC curve support substantially extended
  8. 5y agolineup2plot_sample() gains xlim and ylim control
  9. 5y agolineup2plot_sample() and the propdiff distance added
  10. 5y agolineup2Package description revised for CRAN resubmission

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between lineup2 and spatstat.model?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. spatstat.model is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is lineup2 better than spatstat.model?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. spatstat.model is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to lineup2?

Top lineup2 alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "lineup2 alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/lineup2-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to spatstat.model?

Top spatstat.model alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "spatstat.model alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/spatstat-model for the full list with editorial commentary on each.