RNiftyReg
Medical image registration, maintained with unusual care for other people's conventions.
Comparison · Infra & APIs
kwb.pkgbuild vs profileCI
A side-by-side editorial comparison of kwb.pkgbuild and profileCI — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
kwb.pkgbuild vs profileCI: at a glance
What is kwb.pkgbuild?
kwb.pkgbuild's CI templates went four years without a refresh, then had to be rebuilt for current runners
kwb.pkgbuild automates R package setup at Kompetenzzentrum Wasser Berlin to a house style, and its main deliverable is the GitHub Actions templates it installs into new packages. Between October 2022 and May 2026 there were no releases. During that gap the templates aged past the point of working on current GitHub-hosted runners.
What is profileCI?
Profile-likelihood confidence intervals for any fitted model, in a feed that publishes out of order.
profileCI computes confidence intervals from the profile log-likelihood for user-supplied fitted models, generalising what confint.glm does for GLMs to any model object exposing a log-likelihood. The releases handle the awkward cases that make profiling fail in practice: infinite limits when the profile never drops below the interval threshold, bounded profiling ranges, and interpolation that breaks down near the limits. Only convex log-likelihoods are supported, so disjoint intervals are out of scope by design.
kwb.pkgbuild vs profileCI: editorial side-by-side
kwb.pkgbuild
0.0INFRA · APIS
kwb.pkgbuild's CI templates went four years without a refresh, then had to be rebuilt for current runners
◆ Current state
kwb.pkgbuild automates R package setup at Kompetenzzentrum Wasser Berlin to a house style, and its main deliverable is the GitHub Actions templates it installs into new packages. Between October 2022 and May 2026 there were no releases. During that gap the templates aged past the point of working on current GitHub-hosted runners.
◆ Where it's heading
0.3.0 is a catch-up release rather than a direction change: action versions bumped to checkout@v5, upload-artifact@v4 and codecov-action@v5 to clear the Node.js 20 deprecation, deprecated r-lib/actions@master references replaced with @v2, the retired ubuntu-20.04 runner swapped for ubuntu-latest, and the archived r-hub/sysreqs step replaced with setup-r-dependencies@v2, which also brings dependency caching. One fix stands out: a stale conditional comparing runner.os to the string 'Linux (no, try without!)' had been silently disabling the Linux system-dependency step.
◆ Prediction
For a package whose product is CI configuration, releases will keep tracking GitHub Actions deprecations — the notes already cite the Node.js 20 removal date. The four-year gap suggests updates arrive when something breaks rather than on a schedule.
profileCI
0.0INFRA · APIS
Profile-likelihood confidence intervals for any fitted model, in a feed that publishes out of order.
◆ Current state
profileCI computes confidence intervals from the profile log-likelihood for user-supplied fitted models, generalising what confint.glm does for GLMs to any model object exposing a log-likelihood. The releases handle the awkward cases that make profiling fail in practice: infinite limits when the profile never drops below the interval threshold, bounded profiling ranges, and interpolation that breaks down near the limits. Only convex log-likelihoods are supported, so disjoint intervals are out of scope by design.
◆ Where it's heading
Work is concentrated on numerical reliability rather than scope: 1.1.1 replaced quadratic with monotonic cubic spline interpolation because the quadratic form could fail, and corrected parameter values stored near the confidence limits. The feed publishes these out of order, with the v1.0.0 entry stamped six months after v1.1.0 and carrying the package's full description rather than a changelog, so release order should be read from the version numbers rather than the dates. The same maintainer's revdbayes has been in pure maintenance across this period, which places profileCI as the more active project.
◆ Prediction
Expect further robustness work at the profiling limits and more logLikFn methods for common model classes, following the nls method added in 1.1.0.
Alternatives to kwb.pkgbuild and profileCI
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either kwb.pkgbuild or profileCI.
quickr
quickr's R-to-Fortran compiler now handles matrices, closures and OpenMP.
frontmatter
A small R parser quietly becoming format-agnostic about front matter.
hubValidations
Submission validation for forecast hubs, rebuilt around which file each check belongs to.
rextendr
rextendr put Rust-backed R packages in the browser, then tore itself down for a 1.0.0 rebuild
saperlipopette
saperlipopette turned Git disasters into practice exercises, then passed peer review
See all kwb.pkgbuild alternatives → · See all profileCI alternatives →
Recent activity from kwb.pkgbuild and profileCI
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 3mo agokwb.pkgbuildGitHub Actions templates rebuilt for current runners
- 6mo agoprofileCICubic spline interpolation replaces a quadratic that could fail
- 7mo agoprofileCICRAN 1.0.0 release of profile-likelihood interval computation
- 1y agoprofileCIInfinite limits and bounded profiling ranges handled
- 3y agokwb.pkgbuildRepair CI workflows broken by upstream branch removal
- 4y agokwb.pkgbuildWindows becomes default OS for pkgdown and coverage workflows
- 4y agokwb.pkgbuildBugfix release
- 4y agokwb.pkgbuildRelease with no documented changes
- 4y agokwb.pkgbuildFix R CMD check workflow by adding GITHUB_PAT
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between kwb.pkgbuild and profileCI?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. kwb.pkgbuild and profileCI are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is kwb.pkgbuild better than profileCI?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. kwb.pkgbuild and profileCI are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to kwb.pkgbuild?
Top kwb.pkgbuild alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "kwb.pkgbuild alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/kwb-pkgbuild for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to profileCI?
Top profileCI alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "profileCI alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/profileci for the full list with editorial commentary on each.