← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

kernelshap vs tidytransit

A side-by-side editorial comparison of kernelshap and tidytransit — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

kernelshap vs tidytransit: at a glance

Featurekernelshaptidytransit
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesshap, model explainability, sampling algorithms, numerical correctnessr, transit, gtfs, routing
Last editorial update7h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is kernelshap?

kernelshap makes permutation SHAP practical past eight features, then fixes the kernel weights it had wrong.

kernelshap computes model-agnostic SHAP values in R through Kernel SHAP, permutation SHAP and an exact additive explainer. Version 0.8.0 added a sampling permutation-SHAP algorithm with standard errors and early stopping, lifting the practical feature ceiling past what the exact method allows. Version 0.9.0 then corrected a bug in how kernel weights were computed — exact Kernel SHAP now agrees with exact permutation SHAP — and moved parallelism from foreach to doFuture.

Read the full kernelshap trajectory →

What is tidytransit?

tidytransit tracks the GTFS spec as it grows, one reader and one router feature at a time.

tidytransit reads GTFS transit feeds into tidy data frames and computes travel times using a RAPTOR implementation. Recent work splits between the reader keeping pace with the spec — locations.geojson in 1.7.0, empty strings parsed as NA in 1.8.0 — and the router gaining realism, most recently in-seat transfers. Feed specifications are now pulled from the automatically parsed GTFS reference rather than maintained by hand.

Read the full tidytransit trajectory →

kernelshap vs tidytransit: editorial side-by-side

K
kernelshap
ANALYTICS
0.0

kernelshap makes permutation SHAP practical past eight features, then fixes the kernel weights it had wrong.

◆ Current state

kernelshap computes model-agnostic SHAP values in R through Kernel SHAP, permutation SHAP and an exact additive explainer. Version 0.8.0 added a sampling permutation-SHAP algorithm with standard errors and early stopping, lifting the practical feature ceiling past what the exact method allows. Version 0.9.0 then corrected a bug in how kernel weights were computed — exact Kernel SHAP now agrees with exact permutation SHAP — and moved parallelism from foreach to doFuture.

◆ Where it's heading

Two concerns drive this package: making exact methods reach further, and being demonstrably right. The first shows in the additive explainer, the optional background dataset and the sampling permutation algorithm; the second in unit tests written against Python's shap, credited fixes from outside contributors, and a willingness to ship a correctness fix that changes numbers people have already published. Speed work runs continuously underneath — direct solves replacing the Moore-Penrose pseudo-inverse, roughly 10% less memory.

◆ Prediction

The 0.6.0 and 0.7.0 notes each promised a stable 1.0.0 that has not arrived; with the weighting bug fixed and parallelism reworked, a 1.0 release is the most plausible next step.

T
tidytransit
ANALYTICS
0.0

tidytransit tracks the GTFS spec as it grows, one reader and one router feature at a time.

◆ Current state

tidytransit reads GTFS transit feeds into tidy data frames and computes travel times using a RAPTOR implementation. Recent work splits between the reader keeping pace with the spec — locations.geojson in 1.7.0, empty strings parsed as NA in 1.8.0 — and the router gaining realism, most recently in-seat transfers. Feed specifications are now pulled from the automatically parsed GTFS reference rather than maintained by hand.

◆ Where it's heading

The package has settled into tracking an external standard, which is why the changelog reads as a sequence of spec conformance items rather than a roadmap. Parsing responsibility keeps shifting outward to gtfsio, and data sources have moved with the ecosystem, from the retired transitfeeds API to MobilityData. Router changes are rarer than reader changes but land in the same releases.

◆ Prediction

Further GTFS spec features are the safest expectation, with GTFS-Flex the likeliest area now that locations.geojson reading is in place.

Alternatives to kernelshap and tidytransit

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either kernelshap or tidytransit.

See all kernelshap alternatives → · See all tidytransit alternatives →

Recent activity from kernelshap and tidytransit

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 6mo agotidytransitIn-seat transfers supported in raptor() and travel_times()
  2. 11mo agotidytransitstop_group_distances() no longer ignores the by parameter
  3. 1y agokernelshapKernel weight bug fixed; parallelism moves to doFuture
  4. 1y agokernelshapSampling permutation SHAP with standard errors
  5. 1y agotidytransitlocations.geojson reading; specs parsed from the GTFS reference
  6. 1y agokernelshapBackground data now optional; ranger survival support
  7. 2y agokernelshapFactor-valued predictions dropped
  8. 2y agokernelshapadditive_shap() explains additive models exactly
  9. 2y agotidytransitfare_media_id added to fare_products spec
  10. 2y agokernelshapFaster on plain data.frames
  11. 3y agotidytransitinterpolate_stop_times() added; router updated
  12. 3y agotidytransitDuplicated primary key check improved

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between kernelshap and tidytransit?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. kernelshap and tidytransit are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is kernelshap better than tidytransit?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. kernelshap and tidytransit are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to kernelshap?

Top kernelshap alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "kernelshap alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/kernelshap for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to tidytransit?

Top tidytransit alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "tidytransit alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tidytransit-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.