← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

kde1d vs roclang

A side-by-side editorial comparison of kde1d and roclang — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

kde1d vs roclang: at a glance

Featurekde1droclang
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesdensity-estimation, kernel-methods, zero-inflation, cpp-libraryroxygen2, documentation, developer-tooling, upstream-compat
Last editorial update1h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is kde1d?

A univariate density estimator that added zero-inflated data and reopened its C++ API to do it.

kde1d estimates univariate densities with local polynomial kernel methods, handling bounded, discrete and now zero-inflated variables through a single type argument, with the numerical work in a header-only C++ library usable outside R. Version 1.1.0 added the zero-inflated discrete-continuous mixture case and shipped a new C++ API as an explicit breaking change; 1.1.1 followed in June with auto-generated notes and no description.

Read the full kde1d trajectory →

What is roclang?

A roxygen2 documentation-reuse helper whose release notes are mostly upstream damage control.

roclang lets package authors pull documentation text out of an existing function's roxygen block and splice it into their own — extract_roc_text() with type = "param", "dot_params" or a section selector. The feature surface has been stable since 0.2.1; the parameter-matching rules and the checks for invalid or ambiguous extractions are the substance of what shipped.

Read the full roclang trajectory →

kde1d vs roclang: editorial side-by-side

K
kde1d
ANALYTICS
0.0

A univariate density estimator that added zero-inflated data and reopened its C++ API to do it.

◆ Current state

kde1d estimates univariate densities with local polynomial kernel methods, handling bounded, discrete and now zero-inflated variables through a single type argument, with the numerical work in a header-only C++ library usable outside R. Version 1.1.0 added the zero-inflated discrete-continuous mixture case and shipped a new C++ API as an explicit breaking change; 1.1.1 followed in June with auto-generated notes and no description.

◆ Where it's heading

The package has alternated between performance work and widening the class of data it accepts. The 1.0.0 release was the performance milestone — FFT-based estimation, a better integration algorithm for the p, q and r functions, deterministic jittering replacing randomness, and standalone C++ headers. The 1.1.0 release is the scope milestone, adding a third data type to the two it already handled. Releases come from the same maintainer as svines and cluster on shared dates, so changes in the underlying C++ surface across the vine and density stack tend to ship together.

◆ Prediction

With the C++ API deliberately reworked for standalone use at 1.1.0, further work most plausibly consolidates that interface rather than adding data types. What 1.1.1 actually changed is not readable from its body.

R
roclang
ANALYTICS
0.0

A roxygen2 documentation-reuse helper whose release notes are mostly upstream damage control.

◆ Current state

roclang lets package authors pull documentation text out of an existing function's roxygen block and splice it into their own — extract_roc_text() with type = "param", "dot_params" or a section selector. The feature surface has been stable since 0.2.1; the parameter-matching rules and the checks for invalid or ambiguous extractions are the substance of what shipped.

◆ Where it's heading

Nearly every release since 0.2.0 has been reactive. The package parses documentation text produced by other packages, so a wording change in stats::lm()'s documentation breaks its test suite, and a roxygen2 selection-semantics change forces its parameter matching to follow. The 0.2.3 release is exactly this pattern again. Release cadence has slowed to roughly one entry every two years, and the last two carried no functional change at all.

◆ Prediction

Further releases are most likely triggered by upstream roxygen2 or base R documentation edits breaking tests rather than by new extraction capability. The entries show no queued feature work.

Alternatives to kde1d and roclang

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either kde1d or roclang.

See all kde1d alternatives → · See all roclang alternatives →

Recent activity from kde1d and roclang

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 11mo agoroclangTest fix for changed stats::lm() Reference section
  2. 1y agokde1dkde1d 1.1.1
  3. 1y agokde1dZero-inflated mixtures and a new standalone C++ API
  4. 3y agoroclangREADME loading switched to pkgload, downloads badge added
  5. 3y agoroclangDot-params error messages and ... selection unblocked
  6. 4y agoroclangMulti-parameter selection follows roxygen2 7.1.2 semantics
  7. 4y agokde1dBit-wise Boolean operations removed
  8. 4y agoroclangAmbiguous unqualified function names now error
  9. 4y agoroclangCI workflows, fuller test coverage, unqualified-package fix
  10. 5y agokde1ddkde1d() invisible output fixed
  11. 5y agokde1dValgrind false positive silenced
  12. 6y agokde1dqrng dependency dropped; undefined behaviour fixed

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between kde1d and roclang?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. kde1d and roclang are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is kde1d better than roclang?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. kde1d and roclang are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to kde1d?

Top kde1d alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "kde1d alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/kde1d for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to roclang?

Top roclang alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "roclang alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/roclang for the full list with editorial commentary on each.