← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

kde1d vs probmed

A side-by-side editorial comparison of kde1d and probmed — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

kde1d vs probmed: at a glance

Featurekde1dprobmed
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesdensity-estimation, kernel-methods, zero-inflation, cpp-librarycausal mediation, effect size, semiparametric inference, cross-fitting
Last editorial update1h ago8h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is kde1d?

A univariate density estimator that added zero-inflated data and reopened its C++ API to do it.

kde1d estimates univariate densities with local polynomial kernel methods, handling bounded, discrete and now zero-inflated variables through a single type argument, with the numerical work in a header-only C++ library usable outside R. Version 1.1.0 added the zero-inflated discrete-continuous mixture case and shipped a new C++ API as an explicit breaking change; 1.1.1 followed in June with auto-generated notes and no description.

Read the full kde1d trajectory →

What is probmed?

probmed went from one probabilistic effect size to a family of them in sixteen days.

probmed computes P_med, a scale-free probabilistic effect size for causal mediation, as part of the Data-Wise mediationverse alongside medfit, medsim and RMediation. Three releases in three weeks took it from a single estimator to four additional families built on a shared cross-fitted corner-EIF core, covering gauge-calibrated, incremental-elasticity and Sobol variance-share versions of the proportion mediated. Distribution is GitHub and r-universe rather than CRAN, with a load-bearing Remotes pin on medfit.

Read the full probmed trajectory →

kde1d vs probmed: editorial side-by-side

K
kde1d
ANALYTICS
0.0

A univariate density estimator that added zero-inflated data and reopened its C++ API to do it.

◆ Current state

kde1d estimates univariate densities with local polynomial kernel methods, handling bounded, discrete and now zero-inflated variables through a single type argument, with the numerical work in a header-only C++ library usable outside R. Version 1.1.0 added the zero-inflated discrete-continuous mixture case and shipped a new C++ API as an explicit breaking change; 1.1.1 followed in June with auto-generated notes and no description.

◆ Where it's heading

The package has alternated between performance work and widening the class of data it accepts. The 1.0.0 release was the performance milestone — FFT-based estimation, a better integration algorithm for the p, q and r functions, deterministic jittering replacing randomness, and standalone C++ headers. The 1.1.0 release is the scope milestone, adding a third data type to the two it already handled. Releases come from the same maintainer as svines and cluster on shared dates, so changes in the underlying C++ surface across the vine and density stack tend to ship together.

◆ Prediction

With the C++ API deliberately reworked for standalone use at 1.1.0, further work most plausibly consolidates that interface rather than adding data types. What 1.1.1 actually changed is not readable from its body.

P
probmed
ANALYTICS
0.0

probmed went from one probabilistic effect size to a family of them in sixteen days.

◆ Current state

probmed computes P_med, a scale-free probabilistic effect size for causal mediation, as part of the Data-Wise mediationverse alongside medfit, medsim and RMediation. Three releases in three weeks took it from a single estimator to four additional families built on a shared cross-fitted corner-EIF core, covering gauge-calibrated, incremental-elasticity and Sobol variance-share versions of the proportion mediated. Distribution is GitHub and r-universe rather than CRAN, with a load-bearing Remotes pin on medfit.

◆ Where it's heading

The pace is manuscript-driven — estimators arrive with their citations attached and vignettes alongside, and the 0.1.0 notes correct the estimand itself against a manuscript definition rather than fixing a bug in code. Each release adds inference machinery as well as point estimates: percentile-bootstrap intervals and Fieller sets in 0.3.0, a deterministic MBCO interval in 0.2.0 that avoids resampling entirely. The gauge residual and the pmed_sensitivity() helper suggest a growing concern with when the estimand does not decompose at all.

◆ Prediction

0.3.0 shipped a sensitivity helper for shared mediator-outcome confounding and a diagnostic that flags non-decomposability, so the next release most likely extends that diagnostic side rather than adding a fifth estimator family.

Alternatives to kde1d and probmed

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either kde1d or probmed.

See all kde1d alternatives → · See all probmed alternatives →

Recent activity from kde1d and probmed

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agoprobmedFour estimator families on a cross-fitted corner-EIF core
  2. 2mo agoprobmedParallel mediators and a resampling-free MBCO interval
  3. 2mo agoprobmedFirst release: pmed() with the estimand corrected
  4. 1y agokde1dkde1d 1.1.1
  5. 1y agokde1dZero-inflated mixtures and a new standalone C++ API
  6. 4y agokde1dBit-wise Boolean operations removed
  7. 5y agokde1ddkde1d() invisible output fixed
  8. 5y agokde1dValgrind false positive silenced
  9. 6y agokde1dqrng dependency dropped; undefined behaviour fixed

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between kde1d and probmed?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. kde1d and probmed are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is kde1d better than probmed?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. kde1d and probmed are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to kde1d?

Top kde1d alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "kde1d alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/kde1d for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to probmed?

Top probmed alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "probmed alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/probmed for the full list with editorial commentary on each.