Oh Dear
Oh Dear's weekly changelogs have carried a security section five weeks running.
Comparison · Infra & APIs
k0s vs runc
A side-by-side editorial comparison of k0s and runc — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
k0s vs runc: at a glance
What is k0s?
k0s opens its 1.37 line while security fixes ride the older branches.
k0s published v1.37.1 alongside 1.36.5, 1.35.9 and 1.34.12 on the same morning, so four branches are now live. The older branches took Kubernetes patch bumps, etcd 3.6.15 and deferred manifest directory creation, and 1.36 also scoped the worker autopilot to its own Node. In September, 1.36.4+k0s.1 and 1.35.8+k0s.1 shipped a fix for GHSA-qjgc-wmg7-3jc3, with csr-approver hardening on the 1.35 branch.
What is runc?
runc 1.6.0-rc.1 lifts the 1024-CPU limit and refuses settings it used to quietly ignore
The 1.6.0 cycle opened on October 6 with a first release candidate that is mostly cleanup: deprecated libcontainer APIs removed, Go 1.26 now required, urfave/cli moved from v1 to v3, and the binary about 15% smaller on amd64. The changes with operational weight are that cpuAffinity and NUMA memoryPolicy no longer stop at 1024 CPUs or nodes, and that a container asking for a read-only rootfs without its own mount namespace is now refused. Eleven days earlier 1.5.2 worked around a kernel bug, present since v6.17, that corrupted memory inside runc and caused random crashes on cgroup v2. It also stopped runc exec --cgroup from escaping into a sibling cgroup.
k0s vs runc: editorial side-by-side
k0s
5.0INFRA · APIS
k0s opens its 1.37 line while security fixes ride the older branches.
◆ Current state
k0s published v1.37.1 alongside 1.36.5, 1.35.9 and 1.34.12 on the same morning, so four branches are now live. The older branches took Kubernetes patch bumps, etcd 3.6.15 and deferred manifest directory creation, and 1.36 also scoped the worker autopilot to its own Node. In September, 1.36.4+k0s.1 and 1.35.8+k0s.1 shipped a fix for GHSA-qjgc-wmg7-3jc3, with csr-approver hardening on the 1.35 branch.
◆ Where it's heading
The branch-parallel pattern is holding and now has a new top line. Lifecycle safety stays the core work: reset steps wired to contexts, autopilot retries and discovery refreshes, and autopilot scope limited to its own node. The 1.37 notes read as a long development log rather than a curated release, which fits a project that lets upstream Kubernetes carry the feature story.
◆ Prediction
Expect the next Kubernetes patch round to reach all four branches within hours of each other, and the oldest of them to drop off now that 1.37 is out, though these notes do not state a support window.
runc
2.5INFRA · APIS
runc 1.6.0-rc.1 lifts the 1024-CPU limit and refuses settings it used to quietly ignore
◆ Current state
The 1.6.0 cycle opened on October 6 with a first release candidate that is mostly cleanup: deprecated libcontainer APIs removed, Go 1.26 now required, urfave/cli moved from v1 to v3, and the binary about 15% smaller on amd64. The changes with operational weight are that cpuAffinity and NUMA memoryPolicy no longer stop at 1024 CPUs or nodes, and that a container asking for a read-only rootfs without its own mount namespace is now refused. Eleven days earlier 1.5.2 worked around a kernel bug, present since v6.17, that corrupted memory inside runc and caused random crashes on cgroup v2. It also stopped runc exec --cgroup from escaping into a sibling cgroup.
◆ Where it's heading
The project keeps converting silent behaviour into explicit behaviour. Read-only requests that were ignored now fail, a umask that was dropped is now honoured, and poststart hooks moved to conform to the runtime spec. The same maintainers are shrinking the surface underneath, dropping the deprecated API and the high-level cilium/ebpf path, which took roughly 7.5% off the 1.5.2 binary. Stricter behaviour plus a smaller dependency set is what a component under every container host would be expected to do between majors.
◆ Prediction
1.5.0's notes pointed to a 1.6.0 in late October 2026, and the feed so far shows only rc.1, so further release candidates or the final are the next entries to expect. The refused read-only configurations are the change most likely to surface as user reports during testing.
Alternatives to k0s and runc
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either k0s or runc.
Apache ShenYu
ShenYu's AI gateway plugins are back in motion, with 2.7.2 candidate tags in October.
TestingBot
TestingBot's autumn work is plumbing: a rebuilt tunnel and another bug-tracker link.
KubeArmor
KubeArmor ships fixes as release-candidate tags, and its feed misses the finals.
All Quiet
All Quiet moves from enterprise integrations to the on-call engineer's own day.
Robusta
Robusta's recent releases patch its runner image rather than add features.
Recent activity from k0s and runc
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 5d agok0sk0s opens the 1.37 line with v1.37.1
- 5d agok0s1.36.5: Kubernetes bump, etcd 3.6.15, scoped worker autopilot
- 5d agok0sv1.35.9: Kubernetes, etcd and containerd roll-up
- 5d agok0sv1.34.12: Kubernetes and etcd roll-up
- 26d agoruncRelease candidate lifts 1024-CPU limit, removes deprecated APIs
- 1mo agoruncWorkaround for kernel bug that crashed runc on cgroup v2
- 1mo agok0s1.36.4+k0s.1 fixes GHSA-qjgc-wmg7-3jc3
- 1mo agok0s1.35.8+k0s.1 fixes GHSA-qjgc-wmg7-3jc3, hardens csr-approver
- 3mo agorunctmpfs regression on Ubuntu 20.04 kernels fixed
- 4mo agoruncrunc 1.5.0 stable, with dated support windows for older branches
- 4mo agoruncCVE-2026-41579: /dev symlink host write access fixed
- 4mo agoruncRelease candidate carrying the CVE-2026-41579 fix
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between k0s and runc?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. k0s is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 2.5), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is k0s better than runc?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. k0s is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 2.5), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to k0s?
Top k0s alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "k0s alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/k0s for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to runc?
Top runc alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "runc alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/runc for the full list with editorial commentary on each.