pr2database
The protist reference database keeps widening past the rRNA gene it was built on.
Comparison · Infra & APIs
JointFPM vs PEIMAN2
A side-by-side editorial comparison of JointFPM and PEIMAN2 — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
JointFPM vs PEIMAN2: at a glance
| Feature | JointFPM | PEIMAN2 |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Infra & APIs | Infra & APIs |
| Velocity score | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Sparks · 30d | 0 | 0 |
| Top themes | survival-analysis, recurrent-events, parametric-models, api-stability | proteomics, post-translational-modification, enrichment-analysis, reproducibility |
| Last editorial update | 35m ago | 3h ago |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
What is JointFPM?
Recurrent-event modelling settles, with mean_no() promoted to stable.
JointFPM fits joint flexible parametric models for a recurrent event process alongside a competing terminal event, and predicts the mean number of events. The visible history runs from bug fixes on the earliest CRAN releases through standardization, integration options and a summary method, ending with mean_no() declared stable. Several changes arrived through outside pull requests.
What is PEIMAN2?
PEIMAN2 cut its annotation database loose from its release cycle without breaking CRAN.
PEIMAN2 does enrichment analysis over post-translational modifications, testing whether a protein list is enriched for particular PTMs against UniProt-derived annotations, with translation functions bridging to mass spectrometry workflows. Its answers are only as current as its bundled database, and until June that database could only be refreshed by releasing a new package version. Version 1.1.0 changes that.
JointFPM vs PEIMAN2: editorial side-by-side
JointFPM
0.0INFRA · APIS
Recurrent-event modelling settles, with mean_no() promoted to stable.
◆ Current state
JointFPM fits joint flexible parametric models for a recurrent event process alongside a competing terminal event, and predicts the mean number of events. The visible history runs from bug fixes on the earliest CRAN releases through standardization, integration options and a summary method, ending with mean_no() declared stable. Several changes arrived through outside pull requests.
◆ Where it's heading
The arc runs from a working estimator toward a usable one: input validation and error messages first, then control over the numerical integration, then a summary method and pass-through arguments to the underlying rstpm2 fit. The latest release adds no code so much as a stability commitment to a function users were already calling.
◆ Prediction
With mean_no() stable, the next work most likely targets the prediction and standardization paths rather than the model fit itself.
PEIMAN2
0.0INFRA · APIS
PEIMAN2 cut its annotation database loose from its release cycle without breaking CRAN.
◆ Current state
PEIMAN2 does enrichment analysis over post-translational modifications, testing whether a protein list is enriched for particular PTMs against UniProt-derived annotations, with translation functions bridging to mass spectrometry workflows. Its answers are only as current as its bundled database, and until June that database could only be refreshed by releasing a new package version. Version 1.1.0 changes that.
◆ Where it's heading
The package has been moving from a fixed snapshot toward versioned, user-selectable data. Earlier releases updated the bundled database in place — 1.0.0 shipped the March 2025 version and said little else — which meant the annotation vintage was whatever the package version implied. Now update_peiman_database() downloads and caches external database files and UniProt PTM lists, enrichment workflows take a database_version argument, and the mass-spec translators take a ptmlist_version, so an analysis can pin a dated database rather than a package release. The CRAN-safe default is preserved deliberately: loading, examples and checks still use the bundled internal data and need no network.
◆ Prediction
Version pinning is now expressible but the release notes do not describe how a chosen version is recorded in output, so surfacing the active database version in results is the natural companion. The database and the UniProt PTM list are versioned separately, which leaves room for a combined manifest.
Alternatives to JointFPM and PEIMAN2
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either JointFPM or PEIMAN2.
ggalign
Composable aligned layouts, rebuilt on S7 while ggplot2 4.0 lands underneath.
prioritizr
Conservation planning absorbs the literature's target-setting rules as code.
jSDM
Joint species distribution models in Gibbs-sampled C++, quiet since 2023.
rsofun
An ecosystem model starts tracking carbon isotopes and land-use change.
usmap
Ten years in, US mapping splits its data out and finally adds Puerto Rico.
See all JointFPM alternatives → · See all PEIMAN2 alternatives →
Recent activity from JointFPM and PEIMAN2
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 2mo agoPEIMAN2Database updates decouple from package releases ⚡
- 1y agoJointFPMmean_no() promoted to a stable interface
- 1y agoPEIMAN2Bundled database refreshed to the March 2025 UniProt vintage
- 1y agoPEIMAN2Documentation fix for the second example dataset
- 2y agoJointFPMsummary() method and control arguments passed to rstpm2
- 2y agoJointFPMGaussian quadrature option for the mean-events integration
- 2y agoJointFPMStandardized marginal estimates plus input validation
- 2y agoJointFPMBug fixes for differences between mean-event functions
- 2y agoPEIMAN2Background lists for SEA and PSEA; tidyverse dependency dropped
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between JointFPM and PEIMAN2?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. JointFPM and PEIMAN2 are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is JointFPM better than PEIMAN2?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. JointFPM and PEIMAN2 are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to JointFPM?
Top JointFPM alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "JointFPM alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/jointfpm for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to PEIMAN2?
Top PEIMAN2 alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "PEIMAN2 alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/peiman2 for the full list with editorial commentary on each.