← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

invasimapr vs maths.genealogy

A side-by-side editorial comparison of invasimapr and maths.genealogy — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

invasimapr vs maths.genealogy: at a glance

Featureinvasimaprmaths.genealogy
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesinvasion ecology, species traits, biodiversity, research softwareacademic-genealogy, api-client, graph-visualisation, cran-compliance
Last editorial update7h ago51m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is invasimapr?

invasimapr halved its install size and became citable; the science stayed put.

invasimapr estimates species invasiveness and site invasibility from trait, environmental and resident-community data, exposing a traits → competition → invasion-fitness pipeline behind seven high-level wrappers. Its three releases are all packaging and standards work: a first citable archive in June 2026, then a maturity release bringing it in line with the B-Cubed software development guide. The one behavioral addition in that release is an opt-in standardise_inputs argument on compute_invasion_fitness(), off by default.

Read the full invasimapr trajectory →

What is maths.genealogy?

A young Mathematics Genealogy client spending its first four releases satisfying CRAN.

maths.genealogy queries the Mathematics Genealogy Project over a WebSocket connection and renders academic advisor-student trees, with plot_grviz() as the visualisation entry point. The package reached CRAN in early 2025 and its functional surface has barely moved since — max_zoom() for deep trees at 0.1.1 is the only user-facing addition in the visible history.

Read the full maths.genealogy trajectory →

invasimapr vs maths.genealogy: editorial side-by-side

I
invasimapr
ANALYTICS
0.0

invasimapr halved its install size and became citable; the science stayed put.

◆ Current state

invasimapr estimates species invasiveness and site invasibility from trait, environmental and resident-community data, exposing a traits → competition → invasion-fitness pipeline behind seven high-level wrappers. Its three releases are all packaging and standards work: a first citable archive in June 2026, then a maturity release bringing it in line with the B-Cubed software development guide. The one behavioral addition in that release is an opt-in standardise_inputs argument on compute_invasion_fitness(), off by default.

◆ Where it's heading

The pressure is toward being installable and auditable rather than more capable — install slimmed from roughly 100 MB to 56 MB, R CMD check warnings and notes resolved, sp moved to Suggests, a Darwin Core-aligned data dictionary added, and a Zenodo concept DOI with CITATION.cff, codemeta.json and .zenodo.json. The package moves in lockstep with its B-Cubed sibling dissmapr, tagged within minutes of each other at both 0.1.0 and 0.2.1, which points at project-level standards deadlines rather than independent release decisions. Trait dispersion metrics and scenario exploration remain on the roadmap.

◆ Prediction

Standards compliance is now complete and the roadmap names functional trait dispersion metrics and scenario exploration tools, so the next release is the first that can plausibly be about invasion ecology rather than packaging.

M0.0

A young Mathematics Genealogy client spending its first four releases satisfying CRAN.

◆ Current state

maths.genealogy queries the Mathematics Genealogy Project over a WebSocket connection and renders academic advisor-student trees, with plot_grviz() as the visualisation entry point. The package reached CRAN in early 2025 and its functional surface has barely moved since — max_zoom() for deep trees at 0.1.1 is the only user-facing addition in the visible history.

◆ Where it's heading

Every release after the first is CRAN policy management. Three consecutive entries deal with the same underlying problem: examples that hit a live network resource and therefore fail unpredictably on check machines. The progression from wrapping them in \donttest{} to catching a stray case to rewriting all examples against published API-package guidance shows the maintainer converging on a pattern rather than adding features. That is the normal cost of shipping a network client to CRAN, and it appears to be settling.

◆ Prediction

With the examples problem resolved, the next release is the first plausible opportunity for feature work — likely on the plotting side, given max_zoom() was the sole non-compliance change so far. The entries do not name anything specific in progress.

Alternatives to invasimapr and maths.genealogy

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either invasimapr or maths.genealogy.

See all invasimapr alternatives → · See all maths.genealogy alternatives →

Recent activity from invasimapr and maths.genealogy

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agoinvasimaprVersion bump; notes identical to 0.2.0
  2. 1mo agoinvasimaprB-Cubed standards alignment; install slimmed to 56 MB
  3. 1mo agoinvasimaprinvasimapr v0.1.0: First citable release
  4. 1y agomaths.genealogyExamples rewritten to CRAN API-package guidance
  5. 1y agomaths.genealogyRemaining network-dependent example wrapped in donttest
  6. 1y agomaths.genealogyDESCRIPTION quoting and donttest example wrapping
  7. 1y agomaths.genealogyplot_grviz() gains max_zoom for deep trees

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between invasimapr and maths.genealogy?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. invasimapr and maths.genealogy are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is invasimapr better than maths.genealogy?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. invasimapr and maths.genealogy are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to invasimapr?

Top invasimapr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "invasimapr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/invasimapr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to maths.genealogy?

Top maths.genealogy alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "maths.genealogy alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/maths-genealogy for the full list with editorial commentary on each.