← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

inlabru vs qol

A side-by-side editorial comparison of inlabru and qol — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

inlabru vs qol: at a glance

Featureinlabruqol
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score2.50.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesbayesian-modelling, spatial-statistics, r-package, api-consolidationsas-to-r, data-wrangling, excel-reporting, tabulation
Last editorial update2h ago48m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is inlabru?

A Bayesian spatial modelling package rebuilding its foundations one breaking release at a time

inlabru wraps INLA for spatial, point-process and latent-Gaussian models in R. It is mid-modernisation: since 2.12.0 cut the sp stack, each release has renamed part of the public surface, standardised how external packages attach custom mappers, or replaced internal machinery. 2.15.0 is the latest step, pairing a new predictor evaluation and linearisation implementation with broom's tidy(), glance() and augment() methods and four non-zero-truncated observation families.

Read the full inlabru trajectory →

What is qol?

A SAS-to-R comfort layer that has quietly grown into its own dialect.

qol is a one-maintainer R package aimed at analysts moving from SAS: SAS-shaped verbs (compute., if./else_if., retain_value, do_if blocks), format-driven tabulation through any_table()/summarise_plus(), and styled Excel output as the default destination. Releases land roughly monthly and each one is large. The recent line has shifted from adding verbs to letting conditions be written as parsed character strings, which is the closest the package gets to reproducing SAS syntax inside R.

Read the full qol trajectory →

inlabru vs qol: editorial side-by-side

I
inlabru
INFRA · APIS
2.5

A Bayesian spatial modelling package rebuilding its foundations one breaking release at a time

◆ Current state

inlabru wraps INLA for spatial, point-process and latent-Gaussian models in R. It is mid-modernisation: since 2.12.0 cut the sp stack, each release has renamed part of the public surface, standardised how external packages attach custom mappers, or replaced internal machinery. 2.15.0 is the latest step, pairing a new predictor evaluation and linearisation implementation with broom's tidy(), glance() and augment() methods and four non-zero-truncated observation families.

◆ Where it's heading

The arc is consolidation of the extension surface rather than expansion of the model catalogue. Every release adds mappers or families with one hand and removes a dependency, a re-export or a deprecated path with the other — plyr in 2.15.0, fmesher's Depends entry in 2.14.1, sp and ggmap in 2.12.0. The compatibility flag bru_compat_pre_2_14_enable and the temporary fm_int/fm_pixels re-exports show a maintainer sequencing breaks across releases instead of landing them together.

◆ Prediction

The 2.14 compatibility flag is still defaulting to TRUE and the fmesher re-exports are described in the entries as temporary, so the next obvious move is a release that flips bru_compat_pre_2_14_enable off and drops those re-exports.

Q
qol
INFRA · APIS
0.0

A SAS-to-R comfort layer that has quietly grown into its own dialect.

◆ Current state

qol is a one-maintainer R package aimed at analysts moving from SAS: SAS-shaped verbs (compute., if./else_if., retain_value, do_if blocks), format-driven tabulation through any_table()/summarise_plus(), and styled Excel output as the default destination. Releases land roughly monthly and each one is large. The recent line has shifted from adding verbs to letting conditions be written as parsed character strings, which is the closest the package gets to reproducing SAS syntax inside R.

◆ Where it's heading

Three threads are visible across these releases. Syntax fidelity is the newest: ifelse_multi() introduced character-string conditions with SAS-style writing, and if./else_if. immediately picked the style up. Tabulation flexibility is the constant — any_table() gains per-variable statistic selection, nested variable combinations in brackets, vector order_by, compute support. The third is ecosystem plumbing the maintainer builds when a gap appears: file I/O in 1.3.0, a console message system, global style options, macro variables, and in 1.3.2 a code_statistics() script scanner. Renames to dodge data.table and dplyr masking recur often enough to be a pattern.

◆ Prediction

The maintainer flagged the new percentile behaviour as a first iteration that only works with few grouping variables, so a performance pass on it is the clearest outstanding item. Beyond that the character-condition syntax has reached three functions in two releases and looks likely to spread to the remaining filter-bearing verbs.

Alternatives to inlabru and qol

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either inlabru or qol.

See all inlabru alternatives → · See all qol alternatives →

Recent activity from inlabru and qol

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 23d agoinlabruPredictor linearisation rewritten; broom tidiers, truncated families
  2. 1mo agoqolifelse_multi() brings SAS-style string conditions to R
  3. 2mo agoqolcode_statistics() scans script folders; retain_stat() generalizes
  4. 3mo agoqolcompute. and recode. renamed to dodge dplyr masking
  5. 3mo agoinlabruBugfix release: factor contrasts, raster extraction, error classes
  6. 4mo agoqolFile I/O, a console message system and do_if filter blocks
  7. 5mo agoinlabruNew mappers, standardised cgeneric support, bru_obs storage refactor
  8. 5mo agoqolRow and column percentage keywords; reworked dummy data
  9. 6mo agoqolMacro variables, multi-file import/export and text helpers
  10. 1y agoinlabruMapper classes shortened to bm_*, experimental predictor aggregation
  11. 1y agoinlabruDrops sp and ggmap for an sf-native spatial stack

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between inlabru and qol?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. inlabru is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is inlabru better than qol?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. inlabru is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to inlabru?

Top inlabru alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "inlabru alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/inlabru for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to qol?

Top qol alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "qol alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/qol for the full list with editorial commentary on each.