← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

inlabru vs modsem

A side-by-side editorial comparison of inlabru and modsem — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

inlabru vs modsem: at a glance

Featureinlabrumodsem
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score2.50.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesbayesian-modelling, spatial-statistics, r-package, api-consolidationstructural-equation-modeling, latent-interactions, lms-estimator, mplus-interop
Last editorial update3h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is inlabru?

A Bayesian spatial modelling package rebuilding its foundations one breaking release at a time

inlabru wraps INLA for spatial, point-process and latent-Gaussian models in R. It is mid-modernisation: since 2.12.0 cut the sp stack, each release has renamed part of the public surface, standardised how external packages attach custom mappers, or replaced internal machinery. 2.15.0 is the latest step, pairing a new predictor evaluation and linearisation implementation with broom's tidy(), glance() and augment() methods and four non-zero-truncated observation families.

Read the full inlabru trajectory →

What is modsem?

modsem is grinding latent interaction models toward Mplus parity, one estimator at a time.

modsem fits interaction and quadratic effects between latent variables in R, offering both product-indicator approaches (modsem_pi) and distribution-analytic ones (modsem_da, covering LMS and QML). Releases land roughly monthly and are dense pull-request lists. The recent line is dominated by the LMS approach: gradient refactors, parallel E-steps, composite construct support, and careful handling of residual covariances between latent variables.

Read the full modsem trajectory →

inlabru vs modsem: editorial side-by-side

I
inlabru
INFRA · APIS
2.5

A Bayesian spatial modelling package rebuilding its foundations one breaking release at a time

◆ Current state

inlabru wraps INLA for spatial, point-process and latent-Gaussian models in R. It is mid-modernisation: since 2.12.0 cut the sp stack, each release has renamed part of the public surface, standardised how external packages attach custom mappers, or replaced internal machinery. 2.15.0 is the latest step, pairing a new predictor evaluation and linearisation implementation with broom's tidy(), glance() and augment() methods and four non-zero-truncated observation families.

◆ Where it's heading

The arc is consolidation of the extension surface rather than expansion of the model catalogue. Every release adds mappers or families with one hand and removes a dependency, a re-export or a deprecated path with the other — plyr in 2.15.0, fmesher's Depends entry in 2.14.1, sp and ggmap in 2.12.0. The compatibility flag bru_compat_pre_2_14_enable and the temporary fm_int/fm_pixels re-exports show a maintainer sequencing breaks across releases instead of landing them together.

◆ Prediction

The 2.14 compatibility flag is still defaulting to TRUE and the fmesher re-exports are described in the entries as temporary, so the next obvious move is a release that flips bru_compat_pre_2_14_enable off and drops those re-exports.

M
modsem
INFRA · APIS
0.0

modsem is grinding latent interaction models toward Mplus parity, one estimator at a time.

◆ Current state

modsem fits interaction and quadratic effects between latent variables in R, offering both product-indicator approaches (modsem_pi) and distribution-analytic ones (modsem_da, covering LMS and QML). Releases land roughly monthly and are dense pull-request lists. The recent line is dominated by the LMS approach: gradient refactors, parallel E-steps, composite construct support, and careful handling of residual covariances between latent variables.

◆ Where it's heading

Two things are being closed at once. The modelling gap — composites and formative constructs, categorical estimators, residual covariances in every direction, multigroup and clustered designs — brings modsem toward what commercial Mplus users expect, and the package's Mplus bridge is maintained alongside it, now with unique file IDs and a cleanup argument. The performance gap is the other: memoised H0, parallel E-step, optimized gradients and Hessians for both LMS and QML, all aimed at the distribution-analytic estimators that are expensive by construction. Convention borrowing from lavaan continues in message formatting and standard-error defaults.

◆ Prediction

The 1.0.20 and 1.0.21 releases both spent effort on residual covariances between endogenous and exogenous latent variables across estimation, prediction and standardization, and that thread has not obviously closed. The arrival of a second contributor moving MplusAutomation to Suggests suggests dependency trimming continues.

Alternatives to inlabru and modsem

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either inlabru or modsem.

See all inlabru alternatives → · See all modsem alternatives →

Recent activity from inlabru and modsem

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 23d agoinlabruPredictor linearisation rewritten; broom tidiers, truncated families
  2. 1mo agomodsemUnique Mplus file IDs, cleanup argument, LMS gradient refactor
  3. 2mo agomodsemComposite constructs for LMS, plus MC-LMS-CAT and MC-QML-CAT
  4. 3mo agoinlabruBugfix release: factor contrasts, raster extraction, error classes
  5. 3mo agomodsemPrint spacing and a partial-match fix in getSortedEtas()
  6. 4mo agomodsemCategorical argument for Mplus; partial support for the <~ operator
  7. 5mo agoinlabruNew mappers, standardised cgeneric support, bru_obs storage refactor
  8. 5mo agomodsemConsistent three-way interaction estimates with rcs=TRUE
  9. 6mo agomodsemSecondary pruning and a forward-difference Hessian mode
  10. 1y agoinlabruMapper classes shortened to bm_*, experimental predictor aggregation
  11. 1y agoinlabruDrops sp and ggmap for an sf-native spatial stack

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between inlabru and modsem?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. inlabru is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is inlabru better than modsem?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. inlabru is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to inlabru?

Top inlabru alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "inlabru alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/inlabru for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to modsem?

Top modsem alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "modsem alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/modsem for the full list with editorial commentary on each.