STACAS
Single-cell batch correction that learned to use cell labels, then spent three releases chasing Seurat.
Comparison · Analytics
incase vs rATTAINS
A side-by-side editorial comparison of incase and rATTAINS — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:r-package
incase vs rATTAINS: at a glance
What is incase?
A safer case_when that keeps hardening its guarantees while realigning to tidyverse naming.
incase supplies in_case(), switch_case(), grep_case() and fn_case() as vectorised recoding functions in the dplyr::case_when idiom, with _fct and _list variants that return factors or lists instead of forcing atomic type conversion. The 0.4.0 release deprecates the undotted preserve, default and ordered arguments in favour of dotted forms, starting a removal clock, and adds .exhaustive to error on unmatched inputs.
What is rATTAINS?
The R client for EPA water quality data spent two releases undoing its own promises about data shape.
rATTAINS wraps the EPA's ATTAINS API, which holds state water quality assessments and impaired-waters listings. The package reached 1.0.0 by promising stable, consistently rectangled return structures, then walked that promise back in 1.1.0 when it dropped the dependency doing the rectangling. As of 1.2.0 it also requires an API key, because ATTAINS itself began requiring one in May 2026.
incase vs rATTAINS: editorial side-by-side
incase
0.0ANALYTICS
A safer case_when that keeps hardening its guarantees while realigning to tidyverse naming.
◆ Current state
incase supplies in_case(), switch_case(), grep_case() and fn_case() as vectorised recoding functions in the dplyr::case_when idiom, with _fct and _list variants that return factors or lists instead of forcing atomic type conversion. The 0.4.0 release deprecates the undotted preserve, default and ordered arguments in favour of dotted forms, starting a removal clock, and adds .exhaustive to error on unmatched inputs.
◆ Where it's heading
The arc is consistently toward catching recoding mistakes at the call site rather than letting them pass silently. Early releases broadened how a match can be expressed — pattern matching, function application, factor and list returns. Recent work has shifted to guarantees about the result: correct factor level ordering relative to .default, and now an exhaustiveness check. Notably 0.4.0 reverses the 0.3.2 decision to accept arguments with or without dots, trading that flexibility for namespace safety against user-supplied case names.
◆ Prediction
The deprecation warnings introduced in 0.4.0 point to a follow-up release that removes the undotted arguments outright. Whether .exhaustive eventually becomes the default is unclear from these entries.
rATTAINS
0.0ANALYTICS
The R client for EPA water quality data spent two releases undoing its own promises about data shape.
◆ Current state
rATTAINS wraps the EPA's ATTAINS API, which holds state water quality assessments and impaired-waters listings. The package reached 1.0.0 by promising stable, consistently rectangled return structures, then walked that promise back in 1.1.0 when it dropped the dependency doing the rectangling. As of 1.2.0 it also requires an API key, because ATTAINS itself began requiring one in May 2026.
◆ Where it's heading
The direction is toward a thinner, lower-maintenance wrapper. Caching went in 0.1.4 when hoardr was archived, tidyjson and janitor went earlier, tibblify went in 1.1.0, and each removal handed a little more data-shaping responsibility back to the user — the current advice is to pass .unnest = FALSE and rectangle the results with whatever tidying package you prefer. Release cadence is slow and mostly reactive: upstream API terms, archived dependencies, and compatibility with test tooling account for most of the log. The package's centre of gravity is staying installable and honest about what ATTAINS returns rather than smoothing it over.
◆ Prediction
Given the pattern, the next release is likelier to be a compatibility or upstream-driven fix than new endpoint coverage; how the API key requirement affects users in scripted and CI contexts is the obvious open question the entries do not yet answer.
Alternatives to incase and rATTAINS
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either incase or rATTAINS.
ggtrace
A debugger for ggplot2's internals, hardening its grip as the internals it traces keep moving.
kde1d
A univariate density estimator that added zero-inflated data and reopened its C++ API to do it.
svines
Stationary vine copulas for time series, released in lockstep with the rest of Nagler's vine stack.
gghighlight
A single-purpose ggplot2 extension that has spent six years tracking ggplot2 instead of growing.
rtrek
A Star Trek data package that became a Memory Alpha web client and has been patching scrapers ever since.
See all incase alternatives → · See all rATTAINS alternatives →
Recent activity from incase and rATTAINS
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1mo agorATTAINSATTAINS now requires an API key, and the package follows
- 8mo agorATTAINSThe tibblify dependency goes, and with it the stable data shapes ⚡
- 11mo agoincaseDotted arguments and an .exhaustive matching check
- 1y agorATTAINSTest suite updated for vcr v2
- 2y agoincaseDotted and undotted arguments both accepted
- 3y agorATTAINS1.0.0 commits to stable return structures via tibblify
- 3y agorATTAINSCaching removed after hoardr was archived
- 4y agorATTAINSRequests retry on timeout, with offline detection
- 5y agoincaseFix NULL return when no condition matches
- 5y agoincaseFactor and list return families arrive
- 5y agoincaseDrop unused stats import to clear a check NOTE
- 5y agoincasePattern and function-based matching families added
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between incase and rATTAINS?
Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. incase and rATTAINS are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is incase better than rATTAINS?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. incase and rATTAINS are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to incase?
Top incase alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "incase alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/incase for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to rATTAINS?
Top rATTAINS alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rATTAINS alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rattains for the full list with editorial commentary on each.