Chord
Chord's assistant can now write to the team's knowledge base, not just read from it.
Comparison · Analytics
inbospatial vs weird
A side-by-side editorial comparison of inbospatial and weird — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:r-package
inbospatial vs weird: at a glance
What is inbospatial?
A thin R wrapper over Flemish geospatial services, adding one standard at a time
inbospatial gives R users direct access to Flemish and Belgian government spatial services without hand-writing request URLs. Three releases over three years have built it up service by service: WMS and WMTS tile shorthands and projection-distortion utilities first, then the Flanders digital elevation model, and now OGC API Features querying plus layer discovery for WCS services. Much of each release is hardening the MHT-file parsing that these services return.
What is weird?
weird rebuilt itself on distributional objects, and now the anomaly tooling composes with everything else.
An R package for anomaly detection and unusual-observation diagnostics, at four releases with a long gap between the 2024 patch and the 2026 major line. The current shape is set by 2.0.0, which refactored the package onto distributional objects and renamed its central concept from density_scores() to surprisals(). Since then the work has been filling that structure in: surprisals for more model classes, faster bandwidth and probability calculations, and new visual diagnostics.
inbospatial vs weird: editorial side-by-side
inbospatial
0.0ANALYTICS
A thin R wrapper over Flemish geospatial services, adding one standard at a time
◆ Current state
inbospatial gives R users direct access to Flemish and Belgian government spatial services without hand-writing request URLs. Three releases over three years have built it up service by service: WMS and WMTS tile shorthands and projection-distortion utilities first, then the Flanders digital elevation model, and now OGC API Features querying plus layer discovery for WCS services. Much of each release is hardening the MHT-file parsing that these services return.
◆ Where it's heading
The package grows by absorbing one more service standard per release rather than by adding abstraction. The 0.1.0 additions point the same way — get_feature_ogc() covers a newer OGC standard alongside the existing WCS and WFS paths, and get_wcs_layers() addresses the practical problem that you cannot query a coverage without first knowing what layers exist. Release cadence is slow and driven by which service the maintainers needed next.
◆ Prediction
Expect the next release to add another regional service endpoint or extend OGC API Features coverage, on a timescale of a year or more given the gaps between the three releases so far.
weird
0.0ANALYTICS
weird rebuilt itself on distributional objects, and now the anomaly tooling composes with everything else.
◆ Current state
An R package for anomaly detection and unusual-observation diagnostics, at four releases with a long gap between the 2024 patch and the 2026 major line. The current shape is set by 2.0.0, which refactored the package onto distributional objects and renamed its central concept from density_scores() to surprisals(). Since then the work has been filling that structure in: surprisals for more model classes, faster bandwidth and probability calculations, and new visual diagnostics.
◆ Where it's heading
The refactor onto a shared distribution representation is the decision everything else follows from. It let 2.1.0 add hdr() and parameters() methods for kde objects rather than bespoke accessors, and it let 3.0.0 bring in dist_mclust() to turn a Gaussian mixture model into the same object type — so a mixture, a kernel density estimate and a fitted distribution all flow through one interface. The 3.0.0 additions lean visual and multivariate: outlier maps plotting score distance against orthogonal distance, biplot projections with variable axes overlaid, and an augment() method for robust PCA objects. Dependencies have been shed steadily along the way — lookout, interpolation — while mvscale() moved out and then back in.
◆ Prediction
Expect surprisals() coverage to keep extending to further model classes, and the multivariate and robust-PCA diagnostics introduced in 3.0.0 to gain the same distributional-object treatment as the univariate side.
Alternatives to inbospatial and weird
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either inbospatial or weird.
tidytransit
tidytransit tracks the GTFS spec as it grows, one reader and one router feature at a time.
oblicubes
A tiny grid renderer for oblique-projection cubes, complete since its first release.
biocro
BioCro swapped an unstable iteration for real root finders, changing what its crop models compute.
redist
redist keeps rewriting the sampler underneath a district-drawing API it has held stable since 4.0.
epiflows
epiflows has shipped four releases in eight years, none of which changed the code.
See all inbospatial alternatives → · See all weird alternatives →
Recent activity from inbospatial and weird
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1mo agoweirdOutlier maps, biplot projections, and Gaussian mixtures as distributional objects
- 3mo agoweirdsurprisals() reaches glm objects; lookout dependency dropped
- 4mo agoinbospatialOGC API Features querying and WCS layer discovery arrive
- 6mo agoweirdPackage refactored onto distributional objects; density_scores becomes surprisals
- 1y agoinbospatialFlanders digital elevation model becomes queryable
- 2y agoweirdWine reviews dataset replaced with a fetch function
- 2y agoinbospatialWMS and WMTS shorthands plus projection distortion utilities
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between inbospatial and weird?
Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. inbospatial and weird are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is inbospatial better than weird?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. inbospatial and weird are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to inbospatial?
Top inbospatial alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "inbospatial alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/inbospatial for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to weird?
Top weird alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "weird alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/weird-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.