lpjmlkit
The LPJmL toolkit finally reads NetCDF, closing a gap against the format its field uses.
Comparison · Analytics
inbospatial vs kernelshap
A side-by-side editorial comparison of inbospatial and kernelshap — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
inbospatial vs kernelshap: at a glance
What is inbospatial?
A thin R wrapper over Flemish geospatial services, adding one standard at a time
inbospatial gives R users direct access to Flemish and Belgian government spatial services without hand-writing request URLs. Three releases over three years have built it up service by service: WMS and WMTS tile shorthands and projection-distortion utilities first, then the Flanders digital elevation model, and now OGC API Features querying plus layer discovery for WCS services. Much of each release is hardening the MHT-file parsing that these services return.
What is kernelshap?
kernelshap makes permutation SHAP practical past eight features, then fixes the kernel weights it had wrong.
kernelshap computes model-agnostic SHAP values in R through Kernel SHAP, permutation SHAP and an exact additive explainer. Version 0.8.0 added a sampling permutation-SHAP algorithm with standard errors and early stopping, lifting the practical feature ceiling past what the exact method allows. Version 0.9.0 then corrected a bug in how kernel weights were computed — exact Kernel SHAP now agrees with exact permutation SHAP — and moved parallelism from foreach to doFuture.
inbospatial vs kernelshap: editorial side-by-side
inbospatial
0.0ANALYTICS
A thin R wrapper over Flemish geospatial services, adding one standard at a time
◆ Current state
inbospatial gives R users direct access to Flemish and Belgian government spatial services without hand-writing request URLs. Three releases over three years have built it up service by service: WMS and WMTS tile shorthands and projection-distortion utilities first, then the Flanders digital elevation model, and now OGC API Features querying plus layer discovery for WCS services. Much of each release is hardening the MHT-file parsing that these services return.
◆ Where it's heading
The package grows by absorbing one more service standard per release rather than by adding abstraction. The 0.1.0 additions point the same way — get_feature_ogc() covers a newer OGC standard alongside the existing WCS and WFS paths, and get_wcs_layers() addresses the practical problem that you cannot query a coverage without first knowing what layers exist. Release cadence is slow and driven by which service the maintainers needed next.
◆ Prediction
Expect the next release to add another regional service endpoint or extend OGC API Features coverage, on a timescale of a year or more given the gaps between the three releases so far.
kernelshap
0.0ANALYTICS
kernelshap makes permutation SHAP practical past eight features, then fixes the kernel weights it had wrong.
◆ Current state
kernelshap computes model-agnostic SHAP values in R through Kernel SHAP, permutation SHAP and an exact additive explainer. Version 0.8.0 added a sampling permutation-SHAP algorithm with standard errors and early stopping, lifting the practical feature ceiling past what the exact method allows. Version 0.9.0 then corrected a bug in how kernel weights were computed — exact Kernel SHAP now agrees with exact permutation SHAP — and moved parallelism from foreach to doFuture.
◆ Where it's heading
Two concerns drive this package: making exact methods reach further, and being demonstrably right. The first shows in the additive explainer, the optional background dataset and the sampling permutation algorithm; the second in unit tests written against Python's shap, credited fixes from outside contributors, and a willingness to ship a correctness fix that changes numbers people have already published. Speed work runs continuously underneath — direct solves replacing the Moore-Penrose pseudo-inverse, roughly 10% less memory.
◆ Prediction
The 0.6.0 and 0.7.0 notes each promised a stable 1.0.0 that has not arrived; with the weighting bug fixed and parallelism reworked, a 1.0 release is the most plausible next step.
Alternatives to inbospatial and kernelshap
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either inbospatial or kernelshap.
survminer
survminer is back after a five-year gap, and spending it cutting dependencies loose.
stockplotr
A stock-assessment plotting package is growing a table engine to match its figures.
xts
xts is finished software, and its releases now track R's C API more than user requests.
rjwsacruncher
A thin R wrapper around a Java seasonal-adjustment tool, slowly absorbing the setup work.
etn
etn stopped being an RStudio-server package and became something you can run anywhere.
See all inbospatial alternatives → · See all kernelshap alternatives →
Recent activity from inbospatial and kernelshap
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 4mo agoinbospatialOGC API Features querying and WCS layer discovery arrive
- 1y agokernelshapKernel weight bug fixed; parallelism moves to doFuture
- 1y agokernelshapSampling permutation SHAP with standard errors ⚡
- 1y agoinbospatialFlanders digital elevation model becomes queryable
- 1y agokernelshapBackground data now optional; ranger survival support
- 2y agokernelshapFactor-valued predictions dropped
- 2y agokernelshapadditive_shap() explains additive models exactly
- 2y agokernelshapFaster on plain data.frames
- 2y agoinbospatialWMS and WMTS shorthands plus projection distortion utilities
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between inbospatial and kernelshap?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. inbospatial and kernelshap are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is inbospatial better than kernelshap?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. inbospatial and kernelshap are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to inbospatial?
Top inbospatial alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "inbospatial alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/inbospatial for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to kernelshap?
Top kernelshap alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "kernelshap alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/kernelshap for the full list with editorial commentary on each.