← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

ichimoku vs spatstat.model

A side-by-side editorial comparison of ichimoku and spatstat.model — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

ichimoku vs spatstat.model: at a glance

Featureichimokuspatstat.model
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.02.5
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesfinancial-charting, technical-analysis, dependency-reduction, oandaspatial-statistics, point-processes, model-fitting, r-package
Last editorial update1h ago4h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is ichimoku?

A cloud-chart package quietly swapping its dependencies for its maintainer's own libraries.

ichimoku implements Ichimoku Kinko Hyo cloud charts, strategy backtesting and an OANDA data interface for R. Recent releases are almost entirely plumbing: 1.5.7 drops RcppSimdJson in favor of secretbase for JSON parsing, following earlier releases that moved hashing to secretbase and raised the nanonext and mirai floors. The charting and strategy surface has been stable since the 1.5.0 line.

Read the full ichimoku trajectory →

What is spatstat.model?

spatstat's inference layer builds out determinantal and cluster process fitting

spatstat.model fits point process models and provides the diagnostics that go with them. The recent window is dominated by determinantal point process work — a variance-covariance matrix and more diagnostics in 3.7-2, additional `intensity` and `repul` methods in 3.7-1, and ROC curves for determinantal models in 3.5-0. Cluster and Cox process inference has advanced in parallel, with Waagepetersen's composite likelihood arriving in 3.6-1.

Read the full spatstat.model trajectory →

ichimoku vs spatstat.model: editorial side-by-side

I
ichimoku
ANALYTICS
0.0

A cloud-chart package quietly swapping its dependencies for its maintainer's own libraries.

◆ Current state

ichimoku implements Ichimoku Kinko Hyo cloud charts, strategy backtesting and an OANDA data interface for R. Recent releases are almost entirely plumbing: 1.5.7 drops RcppSimdJson in favor of secretbase for JSON parsing, following earlier releases that moved hashing to secretbase and raised the nanonext and mirai floors. The charting and strategy surface has been stable since the 1.5.0 line.

◆ Where it's heading

The visible arc is consolidation onto the maintainer's own package family — secretbase for hashing and now JSON, nanonext and mirai for concurrency — which steadily removes third-party and Rcpp-based dependencies from the install chain. Feature work is sporadic and narrow when it comes: a faster POSIXct formatter exported as a utility, a multi-session option for the Shiny app, and a fix for asymmetric strategies that failed to emit a final entry signal.

◆ Prediction

Expect further dependency consolidation as the sibling packages gain capabilities, with ichimoku adopting them shortly after release rather than shipping new charting features.

S2.5

spatstat's inference layer builds out determinantal and cluster process fitting

◆ Current state

spatstat.model fits point process models and provides the diagnostics that go with them. The recent window is dominated by determinantal point process work — a variance-covariance matrix and more diagnostics in 3.7-2, additional `intensity` and `repul` methods in 3.7-1, and ROC curves for determinantal models in 3.5-0. Cluster and Cox process inference has advanced in parallel, with Waagepetersen's composite likelihood arriving in 3.6-1.

◆ Where it's heading

The pattern is that model classes enter the package as fitting machinery first and only later gain the apparatus that makes them usable in practice — standard errors, diagnostics, residuals, model checking. Determinantal processes are visibly midway through that progression, reaching variance-covariance estimation only in the most recent release. Around this, the package has been broadening where models can be fitted at all: replicated point patterns on linear networks in 3.5-0, extended spatial logistic regression, and conversion of recursively partitioned models to tessellations.

◆ Prediction

Expect determinantal model support to keep filling out along the same path other model classes took, since variance estimation has only just arrived and partial residuals already exist for the cluster and Cox families. The entries do not signal a move into three dimensions here, unlike the geometry and simulation packages.

Alternatives to ichimoku and spatstat.model

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either ichimoku or spatstat.model.

See all ichimoku alternatives → · See all spatstat.model alternatives →

Recent activity from ichimoku and spatstat.model

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 18d agospatstat.modelVariance-covariance and diagnostics for determinantal models
  2. 2mo agospatstat.modelMore intensity and repul methods; boundary-aware predictions
  3. 2mo agoichimokuJSON parsing moves from RcppSimdJson to secretbase
  4. 6mo agospatstat.modelComposite likelihood for cluster processes
  5. 8mo agospatstat.modelReplicated network models and partial residuals
  6. 10mo agospatstat.modelintensity.ppm improvements for Geyer models
  7. 1y agospatstat.modelROC curve support substantially extended
  8. 1y agoichimokuFaster POSIXct formatting exported as a utility
  9. 1y agoichimokuMultiple concurrent sessions in the OANDA Shiny app
  10. 1y agoichimokuAsymmetric strategies now emit their final entry signal
  11. 2y agoichimokusecretbase floor raised to 1.0.0
  12. 2y agoichimokuArchive verification reverts to SHA256

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between ichimoku and spatstat.model?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. spatstat.model is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is ichimoku better than spatstat.model?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. spatstat.model is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to ichimoku?

Top ichimoku alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ichimoku alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ichimoku for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to spatstat.model?

Top spatstat.model alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "spatstat.model alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/spatstat-model for the full list with editorial commentary on each.