← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

ichimoku vs modeltime.resample

A side-by-side editorial comparison of ichimoku and modeltime.resample — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

ichimoku vs modeltime.resample: at a glance

Featureichimokumodeltime.resample
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesfinancial-charting, technical-analysis, dependency-reduction, oandatime series, cross-validation, tidymodels, compatibility maintenance
Last editorial update1h ago3h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is ichimoku?

A cloud-chart package quietly swapping its dependencies for its maintainer's own libraries.

ichimoku implements Ichimoku Kinko Hyo cloud charts, strategy backtesting and an OANDA data interface for R. Recent releases are almost entirely plumbing: 1.5.7 drops RcppSimdJson in favor of secretbase for JSON parsing, following earlier releases that moved hashing to secretbase and raised the nanonext and mirai floors. The charting and strategy surface has been stable since the 1.5.0 line.

Read the full ichimoku trajectory →

What is modeltime.resample?

modeltime.resample exists to keep backtesting working as tidymodels shifts underneath it.

modeltime.resample runs time series cross-validation over modeltime models, returning per-resample predictions and accuracy plots. Version 0.3.0 is the substantive release in view: tune 2.0.0 compatibility, deterministic seeding via withr, guaranteed .predictions output, and clearer failures when resample fits break. The three releases before it are dependency chores.

Read the full modeltime.resample trajectory →

ichimoku vs modeltime.resample: editorial side-by-side

I
ichimoku
ANALYTICS
0.0

A cloud-chart package quietly swapping its dependencies for its maintainer's own libraries.

◆ Current state

ichimoku implements Ichimoku Kinko Hyo cloud charts, strategy backtesting and an OANDA data interface for R. Recent releases are almost entirely plumbing: 1.5.7 drops RcppSimdJson in favor of secretbase for JSON parsing, following earlier releases that moved hashing to secretbase and raised the nanonext and mirai floors. The charting and strategy surface has been stable since the 1.5.0 line.

◆ Where it's heading

The visible arc is consolidation onto the maintainer's own package family — secretbase for hashing and now JSON, nanonext and mirai for concurrency — which steadily removes third-party and Rcpp-based dependencies from the install chain. Feature work is sporadic and narrow when it comes: a faster POSIXct formatter exported as a utility, a multi-session option for the Shiny app, and a fix for asymmetric strategies that failed to emit a final entry signal.

◆ Prediction

Expect further dependency consolidation as the sibling packages gain capabilities, with ichimoku adopting them shortly after release rather than shipping new charting features.

M0.0

modeltime.resample exists to keep backtesting working as tidymodels shifts underneath it.

◆ Current state

modeltime.resample runs time series cross-validation over modeltime models, returning per-resample predictions and accuracy plots. Version 0.3.0 is the substantive release in view: tune 2.0.0 compatibility, deterministic seeding via withr, guaranteed .predictions output, and clearer failures when resample fits break. The three releases before it are dependency chores.

◆ Where it's heading

Every entry here is compatibility work against something upstream — hardhat 1.0.0, workflows regression mode, then tune 2.0.0 twice. The 0.3.0 notes show a second concern emerging alongside it: making failures legible, with .notes on failed fits, actionable errors from unnest_modeltime_resamples(), and fallback logic when prediction columns go missing across versions. Reproducibility gets the same treatment through explicit seeding.

◆ Prediction

Expect the next release to track the next tidymodels breaking change, with any new work continuing on error reporting rather than resampling strategies.

Alternatives to ichimoku and modeltime.resample

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either ichimoku or modeltime.resample.

See all ichimoku alternatives → · See all modeltime.resample alternatives →

Recent activity from ichimoku and modeltime.resample

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 2mo agoichimokuJSON parsing moves from RcppSimdJson to secretbase
  2. 11mo agomodeltime.resampletune 2.0 support, deterministic seeding, clearer errors
  3. 11mo agomodeltime.resampleDependency cleanup ahead of the next tune release
  4. 1y agoichimokuFaster POSIXct formatting exported as a utility
  5. 1y agoichimokuMultiple concurrent sessions in the OANDA Shiny app
  6. 1y agoichimokuAsymmetric strategies now emit their final entry signal
  7. 2y agoichimokusecretbase floor raised to 1.0.0
  8. 2y agoichimokuArchive verification reverts to SHA256
  9. 3y agomodeltime.resampleFixes workflows in regression mode
  10. 4y agomodeltime.resampleUpdates for hardhat 1.0.0

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between ichimoku and modeltime.resample?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. ichimoku and modeltime.resample are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is ichimoku better than modeltime.resample?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. ichimoku and modeltime.resample are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to ichimoku?

Top ichimoku alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ichimoku alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ichimoku for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to modeltime.resample?

Top modeltime.resample alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "modeltime.resample alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/modeltime-resample for the full list with editorial commentary on each.