compositional.mle
An MLE package rebuilt around composable solvers, then renamed to match.
Comparison · Analytics
hubEvals vs procs
A side-by-side editorial comparison of hubEvals and procs — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:r-package
hubEvals vs procs: at a glance
What is hubEvals?
Forecast-hub scoring that learned to handle joint, sample-based predictions.
hubEvals scores model output from collaborative forecasting hubs, wrapping scoringutils and translating hubverse formats into forecast objects it can evaluate. The package has moved quickly from a thin translation layer to something that handles every output type the hubverse defines — quantile, mean, median, nominal and ordinal pmf, and samples. The most recent releases are almost entirely about the failure modes of relative skill scoring rather than about new metrics.
What is procs?
An R package rebuilding SAS procedures one PROC at a time, now filling in their options.
procs reimplements SAS statistical procedures — FREQ, MEANS, TTEST, REG, SORT, TRANSPOSE — as R functions returning both datasets and report-ready output, as part of the r-sassy suite. The catalogue of procedures is largely assembled; recent releases concentrate on the parameters each one accepts rather than on adding new procedures. Validation documentation is maintained alongside the code, consistent with the regulated environments the suite targets.
hubEvals vs procs: editorial side-by-side
hubEvals
2.5ANALYTICS
Forecast-hub scoring that learned to handle joint, sample-based predictions.
◆ Current state
hubEvals scores model output from collaborative forecasting hubs, wrapping scoringutils and translating hubverse formats into forecast objects it can evaluate. The package has moved quickly from a thin translation layer to something that handles every output type the hubverse defines — quantile, mean, median, nominal and ordinal pmf, and samples. The most recent releases are almost entirely about the failure modes of relative skill scoring rather than about new metrics.
◆ Where it's heading
Two threads dominate. The first is coverage of output types, which reached its widest point with sample-based and compound scoring. The second, and the one occupying every recent release, is making relative skill degrade gracefully: single-model input, comparison groups with one model, and groups missing the requested baseline have each been converted from a cryptic upstream abort into a defined result. That pattern — inherited scoringutils errors being caught and given hub-specific meaning — is the clearest signal of where this package adds value.
◆ Prediction
Expect continued work smoothing scoringutils error surfaces into hub-aware behaviour, and performance attention on relative skill, which was explicitly optimised in the latest release.
procs
0.0ANALYTICS
An R package rebuilding SAS procedures one PROC at a time, now filling in their options.
◆ Current state
procs reimplements SAS statistical procedures — FREQ, MEANS, TTEST, REG, SORT, TRANSPOSE — as R functions returning both datasets and report-ready output, as part of the r-sassy suite. The catalogue of procedures is largely assembled; recent releases concentrate on the parameters each one accepts rather than on adding new procedures. Validation documentation is maintained alongside the code, consistent with the regulated environments the suite targets.
◆ Where it's heading
The work has shifted from breadth to fidelity: where earlier releases introduced whole procedures, recent ones add the options a SAS user expects to find on them, most visibly the where parameter spread across five functions at once and plotting support across three. Statistical output is being widened too, with AIC and adjusted Chi-Square appearing. The remaining gap is per-procedure option coverage rather than missing procedures.
◆ Prediction
Expect continued option-level parity work on the existing procedures, with new statistics added to their output tables, rather than a new proc_* function.
Alternatives to hubEvals and procs
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either hubEvals or procs.
nabla
nabla dropped its C++ engine to chase exact derivatives at any order.
snowflakeauth
Eight months from first release to keyring caching and workload identity.
kwb.geosalz
A research-project workflow package where the interesting work is in the plumbing.
cyclocomp
A cyclomatic complexity checker that ships once every couple of years, and lands when it does.
revdbayes
Extreme value sampling in pure upkeep mode, mostly answering to Rcpp and CRAN.
See all hubEvals alternatives → · See all procs alternatives →
Recent activity from hubEvals and procs
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 24d agohubEvalsScored-forecast counts and faster relative skill
- 1mo agohubEvalsDisaggregated relative skill no longer aborts the whole call
- 1mo agohubEvalsSingle-model scoring returns relative skill of 1 instead of erroring
- 2mo agoprocsproc_ttest() gains sides, freq and weight parameters
- 4mo agoprocsA where parameter arrives across five procedures
- 5mo agohubEvalsSample output types and multivariate compound scoring ⚡
- 6mo agohubEvalsScoring on transformed scales via transform arguments
- 8mo agoprocsAdjusted Chi-Square added, altering the proc_freq() table
- 11mo agohubEvalsFirst release: score_model_out() and the scoringutils bridge
- 2y agoprocsproc_reg() added for regression
- 2y agoprocsOrdered-factor handling fixed across three procedures
- 2y agoprocsproc_ttest() added, plus factor casting on proc_sort()
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between hubEvals and procs?
Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. hubEvals is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is hubEvals better than procs?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. hubEvals is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to hubEvals?
Top hubEvals alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "hubEvals alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/hubevals for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to procs?
Top procs alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "procs alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/procs for the full list with editorial commentary on each.