compositional.mle
An MLE package rebuilt around composable solvers, then renamed to match.
Comparison · Analytics
hubEvals vs hubUtils
A side-by-side editorial comparison of hubEvals and hubUtils — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:epidemiologyr-packagehubverse
hubEvals vs hubUtils: at a glance
What is hubEvals?
Forecast-hub scoring that learned to handle joint, sample-based predictions.
hubEvals scores model output from collaborative forecasting hubs, wrapping scoringutils and translating hubverse formats into forecast objects it can evaluate. The package has moved quickly from a thin translation layer to something that handles every output type the hubverse defines — quantile, mean, median, nominal and ordinal pmf, and samples. The most recent releases are almost entirely about the failure modes of relative skill scoring rather than about new metrics.
What is hubUtils?
The hubverse's shared plumbing, tracking schema versions and converting output types.
hubUtils is the low-level dependency the rest of the hubverse builds on: schema version tracking, config file reading, example test hubs, and conversion between forecast output types. Its releases are small and cadenced to the hubverse schema itself, with a version bump arriving whenever the config schema advances. The recent work is performance rather than surface.
hubEvals vs hubUtils: editorial side-by-side
hubEvals
2.5ANALYTICS
Forecast-hub scoring that learned to handle joint, sample-based predictions.
◆ Current state
hubEvals scores model output from collaborative forecasting hubs, wrapping scoringutils and translating hubverse formats into forecast objects it can evaluate. The package has moved quickly from a thin translation layer to something that handles every output type the hubverse defines — quantile, mean, median, nominal and ordinal pmf, and samples. The most recent releases are almost entirely about the failure modes of relative skill scoring rather than about new metrics.
◆ Where it's heading
Two threads dominate. The first is coverage of output types, which reached its widest point with sample-based and compound scoring. The second, and the one occupying every recent release, is making relative skill degrade gracefully: single-model input, comparison groups with one model, and groups missing the requested baseline have each been converted from a cryptic upstream abort into a defined result. That pattern — inherited scoringutils errors being caught and given hub-specific meaning — is the clearest signal of where this package adds value.
◆ Prediction
Expect continued work smoothing scoringutils error surfaces into hub-aware behaviour, and performance attention on relative skill, which was explicitly optimised in the latest release.
hubUtils
0.0ANALYTICS
The hubverse's shared plumbing, tracking schema versions and converting output types.
◆ Current state
hubUtils is the low-level dependency the rest of the hubverse builds on: schema version tracking, config file reading, example test hubs, and conversion between forecast output types. Its releases are small and cadenced to the hubverse schema itself, with a version bump arriving whenever the config schema advances. The recent work is performance rather than surface.
◆ Where it's heading
The through-line is that this package absorbs whatever the schema is doing — v5, then v6 with target-data configuration, each arriving with matching accessors and example hubs so the sibling packages can be tested against something real. convert_output_type() is the one piece of genuine computation here, and it has now been optimised by roughly an order of magnitude, suggesting it is being used at scales the original implementation did not anticipate. Everything else is accessors and fixtures.
◆ Prediction
Expect the next substantive release to track the next hubverse schema version, with any independent work concentrated on convert_output_type(), the only performance-sensitive function in the package.
Alternatives to hubEvals and hubUtils
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either hubEvals or hubUtils.
nabla
nabla dropped its C++ engine to chase exact derivatives at any order.
snowflakeauth
Eight months from first release to keyring caching and workload identity.
kwb.geosalz
A research-project workflow package where the interesting work is in the plumbing.
cyclocomp
A cyclomatic complexity checker that ships once every couple of years, and lands when it does.
revdbayes
Extreme value sampling in pure upkeep mode, mostly answering to Rcpp and CRAN.
See all hubEvals alternatives → · See all hubUtils alternatives →
Recent activity from hubEvals and hubUtils
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 24d agohubEvalsScored-forecast counts and faster relative skill
- 1mo agohubEvalsDisaggregated relative skill no longer aborts the whole call
- 1mo agohubUtilsconvert_output_type() drops an order of magnitude in time and memory
- 1mo agohubEvalsSingle-model scoring returns relative skill of 1 instead of erroring
- 5mo agohubEvalsSample output types and multivariate compound scoring ⚡
- 6mo agohubEvalsScoring on transformed scales via transform arguments
- 7mo agohubUtilsGraceful failure when remote resources are unreachable
- 9mo agohubUtilsAccessors for target-data.json configuration
- 9mo agohubUtilsSchema v6.0.0 support and two example v6 hubs
- 10mo agohubUtilsLightweight example v5 hubs added for tests
- 11mo agohubEvalsFirst release: score_model_out() and the scoringutils bridge
- 1y agohubUtilsconvert_output_type() introduced for sample-to-summary conversion
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between hubEvals and hubUtils?
Both compete on the same themes — epidemiology, r-package, hubverse — within Analytics. hubEvals is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is hubEvals better than hubUtils?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. hubEvals is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to hubEvals?
Top hubEvals alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "hubEvals alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/hubevals for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to hubUtils?
Top hubUtils alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "hubUtils alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/hubutils for the full list with editorial commentary on each.