← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

hoopr vs trendseries

A side-by-side editorial comparison of hoopr and trendseries — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

hoopr vs trendseries: at a glance

Featurehooprtrendseries
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.03.8
Sparks · 30d01
Top themessports-data, basketball, api-client, httr2time-series, econometrics, r-package, seasonal-decomposition
Last editorial update41m ago2h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is hoopr?

hoopR rebuilds its HTTP layer on httr2 to stop segfaulting on modern systems

hoopR is the sportsdataverse R package for basketball data, wrapping ESPN, NBA Stats, NBA G-League, NCAA and KenPom behind a single set of loaders. Version 3.0.0 replaces httr with httr2 across every one of those backends, drops httr from Imports, and routes all calls through shared internal retry and response helpers. The change is breaking, and it exists because the old stack segfaulted against libcurl 8.x and curl 7.0.0.

Read the full hoopr trajectory →

What is trendseries?

A trend-extraction toolkit grows a full decomposition engine, seasonal components and all.

trendseries extracts trends from economic time series through two pipe-friendly functions, backed by an unusually broad method set — Hodrick-Prescott in one- and two-sided variants, Baxter-King, Christiano-Fitzgerald, Hamilton regression, Beveridge-Nelson, unobserved components, plus the moving average and smoothing family. The 1.4 release adds decomposition proper: an exported decompose_series() that splits a series into trend, seasonal, and remainder across five methods and guarantees the components add back to the original values.

Read the full trendseries trajectory →

hoopr vs trendseries: editorial side-by-side

H
hoopr
ANALYTICS
0.0

hoopR rebuilds its HTTP layer on httr2 to stop segfaulting on modern systems

◆ Current state

hoopR is the sportsdataverse R package for basketball data, wrapping ESPN, NBA Stats, NBA G-League, NCAA and KenPom behind a single set of loaders. Version 3.0.0 replaces httr with httr2 across every one of those backends, drops httr from Imports, and routes all calls through shared internal retry and response helpers. The change is breaking, and it exists because the old stack segfaulted against libcurl 8.x and curl 7.0.0.

◆ Where it's heading

The package's history is two distinct eras. Through 2021-2023 it grew by endpoint accretion — ESPN stat functions, G-League coverage, the NBA live and boxscore V3 families, on-court players in play-by-play — expanding what could be pulled. The recent work is consolidation instead: one HTTP pipeline, one messaging library, data served from the shared sportsdataverse-data releases rather than per-package repositories. The centre of gravity has moved from adding endpoints to making the plumbing survive its dependencies.

◆ Prediction

With the HTTP layer unified behind shared helpers, expect the sibling sportsdataverse packages to follow the same httr2 migration, and hoopR's own next releases to resume endpoint work now that requests run through one pipeline.

T
trendseries
ANALYTICS
3.8

A trend-extraction toolkit grows a full decomposition engine, seasonal components and all.

◆ Current state

trendseries extracts trends from economic time series through two pipe-friendly functions, backed by an unusually broad method set — Hodrick-Prescott in one- and two-sided variants, Baxter-King, Christiano-Fitzgerald, Hamilton regression, Beveridge-Nelson, unobserved components, plus the moving average and smoothing family. The 1.4 release adds decomposition proper: an exported decompose_series() that splits a series into trend, seasonal, and remainder across five methods and guarantees the components add back to the original values.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is moving from breadth of methods to rigour about what those methods produce. Recent work has been about defaults and guarantees rather than new filters: the unobserved components model now derives its signal-to-noise ratios from Hodrick-Prescott lambdas so the default output is economically interpretable, decomposition carries an exact additive identity, and a log transform gives a uniform multiplicative variant across every method. Naming is being tidied in the same spirit, with group_vars deprecated in favour of group_cols. Side-by-side method comparison — passing several methods and getting each one's components as separate columns — suggests an audience that treats method choice as a research question rather than a setting.

◆ Prediction

Expect the comparison and diagnostic side to keep developing, since the package now produces multiple decompositions of the same series and offers no ranking between them; the entries give no indication of new filters being queued.

Alternatives to hoopr and trendseries

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either hoopr or trendseries.

See all hoopr alternatives → · See all trendseries alternatives →

Recent activity from hoopr and trendseries

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 15d agotrendseriesDecomposition becomes a first-class operation, five methods deep
  2. 3mo agotrendseriesMulti-column trends and economically grounded UCM defaults
  3. 4mo agohooprhoopR 3.0.0 moves every API backend to httr2
  4. 10mo agotrendseriesFirst production release with 21 trend extraction methods
  5. 2y agohooprData loaders repoint to sportsdataverse-data; NBA live endpoints
  6. 4y agohooprESPN stat functions and G-League coverage added
  7. 4y agohooprCRAN release with documented return shapes
  8. 4y agohooprhoopR 1.4.4
  9. 4y agohooprhoopR 1.4.3

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between hoopr and trendseries?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. trendseries is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 3.8 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is hoopr better than trendseries?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. trendseries is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 3.8 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to hoopr?

Top hoopr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "hoopr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/hoopr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to trendseries?

Top trendseries alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "trendseries alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/trendseries for the full list with editorial commentary on each.