tidytlg
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
Comparison · Analytics
hoardr vs nodbi
A side-by-side editorial comparison of hoardr and nodbi — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:ropensci
hoardr vs nodbi: at a glance
What is hoardr?
A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.
hoardr manages local cache directories for other R packages — where files go, how they are keyed, whether they exist. It underpins caching in several rOpenSci data clients. The last functional additions were in 2018; everything since is a patch issued because CRAN reported a test failure or the maintainer changed.
What is nodbi?
One document API over six databases, and every release is spent absorbing their JSON engines' churn
nodbi presents a single document-store interface — docdb_create, docdb_query, docdb_update — over SQLite, DuckDB, PostgreSQL, MongoDB, CouchDB and Elasticsearch. The engineering reality behind that abstraction is that each backend's JSON support keeps moving, and the releases show it: jsonb_tree adopted as RSQLite 2.4.4 exposes it, json_tree reworked for DuckDB 1.3.0, then avoided entirely for DuckDB listfields because it was too slow. The 0.11.0 release in late 2024 is the one that changed the contract, making docdb_query() return columns of a single consistent type.
hoardr vs nodbi: editorial side-by-side
hoardr
0.0ANALYTICS
A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.
◆ Current state
hoardr manages local cache directories for other R packages — where files go, how they are keyed, whether they exist. It underpins caching in several rOpenSci data clients. The last functional additions were in 2018; everything since is a patch issued because CRAN reported a test failure or the maintainer changed.
◆ Where it's heading
This is infrastructure that has reached its final shape. Three of the last three releases were reactive: two responses to CRAN test-failure notifications, one to a maintainer handover. The single behavioural change in that stretch — forward slashes in paths on every operating system — is a consistency fix for downstream packages rather than a feature. Its release cadence is set by CRAN's checks, not by demand.
◆ Prediction
Expect the next release to be triggered by another CRAN check failure rather than by new functionality, matching every release since 2018.
nodbi
0.0ANALYTICS
One document API over six databases, and every release is spent absorbing their JSON engines' churn
◆ Current state
nodbi presents a single document-store interface — docdb_create, docdb_query, docdb_update — over SQLite, DuckDB, PostgreSQL, MongoDB, CouchDB and Elasticsearch. The engineering reality behind that abstraction is that each backend's JSON support keeps moving, and the releases show it: jsonb_tree adopted as RSQLite 2.4.4 exposes it, json_tree reworked for DuckDB 1.3.0, then avoided entirely for DuckDB listfields because it was too slow. The 0.11.0 release in late 2024 is the one that changed the contract, making docdb_query() return columns of a single consistent type.
◆ Where it's heading
Two threads dominate. The first is performance, pursued backend by backend: fast direct NDJSON import moved from DuckDB-only to SQLite and PostgreSQL, query refactors chasing each DuckDB release, and the removal of expensive tree-walking where a cheaper path exists. The second is making results predictable — consistent column types, version checks on the database backend, clearer messages when a Postgres database does not exist yet or when column names contain the dots nodbi reserves for JSON paths.
◆ Prediction
Given that most recent releases are triggered by DuckDB and RSQLite version changes, the next one likely follows the same pattern — adopting a new JSON function or working around a slow one. The duplicate-_id handling added in 0.14.0 suggests NDJSON ingestion edge cases are the current active area.
Alternatives to hoardr and nodbi
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either hoardr or nodbi.
Tplyr
Tplyr made clinical summary tables explain where every number came from.
rlistings
Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.
gigs
gigs redesigned its whole conversion API for rOpenSci, then spent three releases getting the docs to build.
riem
A weather-data client that keeps rewriting its HTTP layer while slowly tightening its API.
datasetjson
datasetjson rebuilt its object model to track the CDISC Dataset-JSON 1.1 schema.
See all hoardr alternatives → · See all nodbi alternatives →
Recent activity from hoardr and nodbi
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 8mo agonodbijsonb_tree adopted; $in string queries and duplicate _id handling fixed
- 1y agonodbiDuckDB version parsing and listfields fix
- 1y agonodbidocdb_query reworked for DuckDB 1.3.0
- 1y agonodbiNDJSON writing delegated to DuckDB's internal function
- 1y agohoardrPaths use forward slashes on every platform
- 1y agonodbiQuery results get consistent column types; fast NDJSON import reaches SQLite and Postgres ⚡
- 1y agonodbiQuery and file-import speedups via newer DuckDB features
- 2y agohoardrTest-only patch for a CRAN failure
- 3y agohoardrPatch release for maintainer handover
- 7y agohoardrFixes cache paths leaking between HoardClient instances
- 7y agohoardrFile-existence checks and full-path cache configuration
- 9y agohoardrCRAN disk-writing policy compliance
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between hoardr and nodbi?
Both compete on the same themes — ropensci — within Analytics. hoardr and nodbi are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is hoardr better than nodbi?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. hoardr and nodbi are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to hoardr?
Top hoardr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "hoardr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/hoardr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to nodbi?
Top nodbi alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "nodbi alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/nodbi for the full list with editorial commentary on each.