← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

Apache HertzBeat vs OpenReplay

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Apache HertzBeat and OpenReplay — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:observability

Apache HertzBeat vs OpenReplay: at a glance

FeatureApache HertzBeatOpenReplay
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score2.55.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesmonitoring, observability, apache, modularizationsession-replay, user-journey, analytics, self-hosted
Last editorial update1mo ago17h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is Apache HertzBeat?

A monitoring project whose public release feed skips the release that mattered.

HertzBeat's tracked entries cover four release candidates, and the record is patchy — v1.7.1 through v1.7.3 in mid-2025 carry no notes beyond a merge commit or a signoff line, then an eleven-month gap to v1.9.0-rc1 in July 2026. The 1.8.0 release never appears in the feed at all despite v1.9.0-rc1's own changelog referencing 1.8.0 documentation and download page updates, so this record is missing a version. What v1.9.0-rc1 does show is a split of hertzbeat-common into core and Spring modules, monitoring template fixes and broad internationalization work.

Read the full Apache HertzBeat trajectory →

What is OpenReplay?

OpenReplay handles dynamic HTML root swaps and iterates user journey analytics

OpenReplay's recent releases are primarily stability improvements and UX iterations on session replay and user journey analytics. The HTML swap handler in 0916 resolves a recording gap where apps that dynamically swap the root DOM element produced broken replays. User journey analytics received several targeted fixes — titles, event properties in breakdowns, clickmap renderer tweaks. Pre-v1.28.0 fixed three docker-compose upgrade failures that had blocked self-hosted upgrades.

Read the full OpenReplay trajectory →

Apache HertzBeat vs OpenReplay: editorial side-by-side

A2.5

A monitoring project whose public release feed skips the release that mattered.

◆ Current state

HertzBeat's tracked entries cover four release candidates, and the record is patchy — v1.7.1 through v1.7.3 in mid-2025 carry no notes beyond a merge commit or a signoff line, then an eleven-month gap to v1.9.0-rc1 in July 2026. The 1.8.0 release never appears in the feed at all despite v1.9.0-rc1's own changelog referencing 1.8.0 documentation and download page updates, so this record is missing a version. What v1.9.0-rc1 does show is a split of hertzbeat-common into core and Spring modules, monitoring template fixes and broad internationalization work.

◆ Where it's heading

The visible direction is structural cleanup rather than new monitoring coverage — separating framework-agnostic code from Spring-specific code is the kind of refactor a project does when it wants the core embeddable elsewhere. The internationalization work and Apache graduation blog point at a project investing in the things that widen a contributor base. The revert of MongoDB user account metrics within the same candidate suggests new collectors still land unevenly.

◆ Prediction

Expect the common module split to continue and MongoDB account metrics to return once the issue behind the revert is resolved. The missing 1.8.0 entry is a feed gap worth confirming before treating the eleven-month silence as real.

O
OpenReplay
ANALYTICS
5.0

OpenReplay handles dynamic HTML root swaps and iterates user journey analytics

◆ Current state

OpenReplay's recent releases are primarily stability improvements and UX iterations on session replay and user journey analytics. The HTML swap handler in 0916 resolves a recording gap where apps that dynamically swap the root DOM element produced broken replays. User journey analytics received several targeted fixes — titles, event properties in breakdowns, clickmap renderer tweaks. Pre-v1.28.0 fixed three docker-compose upgrade failures that had blocked self-hosted upgrades.

◆ Where it's heading

OpenReplay is iterating on analytics depth (user journeys, breakdowns, clickmaps) while filling in session recording edge cases. The docker-compose upgrade reliability work suggests v1.28.0 is in active preparation and self-hosted deployment is a priority — important for a product competing on 'open-source alternative to FullStory/Hotjar' positioning.

◆ Prediction

v1.28.0 will likely ship the user journey improvements alongside docker-compose upgrade stability, positioning OpenReplay's self-hosted option more competitively for teams with on-premise replay requirements.

Alternatives to Apache HertzBeat and OpenReplay

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Apache HertzBeat or OpenReplay.

See all Apache HertzBeat alternatives → · See all OpenReplay alternatives →

Recent activity from Apache HertzBeat and OpenReplay

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1d agoOpenReplaymain-backup-20260923095926: Increment db chart version to v1.27.4 (#4918)
  2. 1d agoOpenReplayFix: page title persistence across recording batches
  3. 5d agoOpenReplayFix: exclude users from breakdown analysis
  4. 5d agoOpenReplayRefactor: user journey metric title query
  5. 5d agoOpenReplayFix: spritemap restoration in session replay
  6. 5d agoOpenReplayUser journey patches: breakdown table, event properties, clickmap renderer, titles
  7. 1mo agoApache HertzBeatCommon module split into core and Spring; i18n work lands
  8. 1y agoApache HertzBeatDocs update and Apache graduation blog post
  9. 1y agoApache HertzBeatVersion bump candidate with no recorded changes
  10. 1y agoApache HertzBeatCandidate tag containing only a branch merge

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Apache HertzBeat and OpenReplay?

Both compete on the same themes — observability — within Analytics. OpenReplay is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 2.5), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Apache HertzBeat better than OpenReplay?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. OpenReplay is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 2.5), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Apache HertzBeat?

Top Apache HertzBeat alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Apache HertzBeat alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/hertzbeat for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to OpenReplay?

Top OpenReplay alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "OpenReplay alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/openreplay for the full list with editorial commentary on each.