← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

healthyR.data vs mev

A side-by-side editorial comparison of healthyR.data and mev — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

healthyR.data vs mev: at a glance

FeaturehealthyR.datamev
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesr-package, healthcare-data, cms, api-clientextreme-value-theory, threshold-selection, statistical-estimation, api-redesign
Last editorial update1h ago3h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is healthyR.data?

From a bundled hospital dataset to a live CMS API client.

healthyR.data supplies the data layer for the healthyverse packages. It began by shipping hospital data inside the package and now fetches from CMS and provider endpoints at call time through get_cms_meta_data(), fetch_cms_data(), and their provider counterparts. The most recent release is a single httr2 compatibility fix.

Read the full healthyR.data trajectory →

What is mev?

An extreme-value toolkit reorganised its whole API into prefixed families and tripled its estimator count.

mev provides likelihood-based inference for univariate and multivariate extreme value models — threshold selection, shape estimation, tail dependence and max-stable simulation. Version 2.0 was a deliberate reorganisation: every threshold-selection routine now carries a thselect. prefix, every stability plot a tstab. prefix, and every extremal-dependence measure an xdep. prefix, with the old names deprecated but mostly still working. The same release added a large batch of estimators — Stein-weighted GPD, roughly a dozen shape estimators, second-order regular variation, L-moment GPD and Weissman quantiles.

Read the full mev trajectory →

healthyR.data vs mev: editorial side-by-side

H
healthyR.data
ANALYTICS
0.0

From a bundled hospital dataset to a live CMS API client.

◆ Current state

healthyR.data supplies the data layer for the healthyverse packages. It began by shipping hospital data inside the package and now fetches from CMS and provider endpoints at call time through get_cms_meta_data(), fetch_cms_data(), and their provider counterparts. The most recent release is a single httr2 compatibility fix.

◆ Where it's heading

The 2023 release added roughly twenty current_*_data() accessors, one per CMS measure file - a wide but static surface. The 2024 releases replaced that approach with metadata lookup plus generic fetchers, then taught the fetchers to handle CSV, Excel, and ZIP payloads rather than API responses alone. The package's weight has moved from what it ships to what it can retrieve.

◆ Prediction

With the fetch layer generalised, the next visible work is more likely record-limit and error handling around httr2 than further per-measure accessors.

M
mev
ANALYTICS
0.0

An extreme-value toolkit reorganised its whole API into prefixed families and tripled its estimator count.

◆ Current state

mev provides likelihood-based inference for univariate and multivariate extreme value models — threshold selection, shape estimation, tail dependence and max-stable simulation. Version 2.0 was a deliberate reorganisation: every threshold-selection routine now carries a thselect. prefix, every stability plot a tstab. prefix, and every extremal-dependence measure an xdep. prefix, with the old names deprecated but mostly still working. The same release added a large batch of estimators — Stein-weighted GPD, roughly a dozen shape estimators, second-order regular variation, L-moment GPD and Weissman quantiles.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is consolidating into a reference implementation of the extreme-value literature rather than a collection of one-off routines. Sixteen threshold-selection methods now share standardised arguments and their own plot and print methods with automatic selection, which is the tell: the goal is comparability across methods, not just availability. Dependency reduction runs alongside, with distribution functions written in-package to drop evd and Rsolnp replacing nloptr in earlier releases.

◆ Prediction

Version 2.1 continued adding threshold-selection routines within the new naming scheme, so the next release most likely follows the same pattern — more estimators fitted to the established prefixes, plus fixes to the 2.0 renaming. The entries give no sign of a further structural change.

Alternatives to healthyR.data and mev

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either healthyR.data or mev.

See all healthyR.data alternatives → · See all mev alternatives →

Recent activity from healthyR.data and mev

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 9mo agomevTwo more threshold-selection routines slot into the new scheme
  2. 9mo agomevThreshold, stability and dependence functions regrouped under prefixes
  3. 1y agohealthyR.datahttr2 compatibility fix
  4. 2y agomevBoundary-case likelihood fixes, bundled with the prior release's notes
  5. 2y agohealthyR.dataFetchers handle CSV, Excel, and ZIP, with a record limit
  6. 2y agohealthyR.dataMetadata lookup and generic CMS fetchers replace bundled data
  7. 3y agohealthyR.dataTwenty CMS measure accessors added
  8. 3y agomevGEV and GP distribution functions brought in-house to drop evd
  9. 3y agohealthyR.datacli, crayon, and rstudioapi dependencies dropped
  10. 4y agomevFour max-stable families, fixed parameters and threshold diagnostics
  11. 5y agohealthyR.dataxz compression added to meet CRAN size policy

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between healthyR.data and mev?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. healthyR.data and mev are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is healthyR.data better than mev?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. healthyR.data and mev are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to healthyR.data?

Top healthyR.data alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "healthyR.data alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/healthyr-data for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to mev?

Top mev alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "mev alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/mev for the full list with editorial commentary on each.