← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

gratia vs reliagrowr

A side-by-side editorial comparison of gratia and reliagrowr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

gratia vs reliagrowr: at a glance

Featuregratiareliagrowr
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesgam, mgcv, ggplot2, statistical-graphicsreliability-engineering, r-package, repairable-systems, mcp
Last editorial update49m ago5h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is gratia?

The tidy front-end for GAMs, now stable enough that upstream ggplot2 sets its release calendar.

gratia wraps mgcv-fitted generalized additive models in tidy data frames and ggplot2 graphics — smooth_estimates(), fitted_values(), derivatives(), draw() and appraise() cover evaluation, prediction and diagnostics. The API reached its intended shape at 0.9.0, when every generated column was renamed to a dot-prefixed form, and 0.10.0 added conditional_values() for covariate-conditional prediction plots.

Read the full gratia trajectory →

What is reliagrowr?

A reliability growth package put its models behind an MCP server for AI assistants to call.

ReliaGrowR fits reliability growth models to failure data — Crow-AMSAA and Duane, with maximum likelihood estimation, confidence bounds, prediction, and reliability demonstration test planning. The last year widened it well past growth curves into repairable systems: parametric non-homogeneous Poisson process fitting with automatic change point detection, non-parametric mean cumulative function estimation, and system exposure calculation. The most recent release adds goodness-of-fit statistics and exposes the package's functions as Model Context Protocol tools.

Read the full reliagrowr trajectory →

gratia vs reliagrowr: editorial side-by-side

G
gratia
ANALYTICS
0.0

The tidy front-end for GAMs, now stable enough that upstream ggplot2 sets its release calendar.

◆ Current state

gratia wraps mgcv-fitted generalized additive models in tidy data frames and ggplot2 graphics — smooth_estimates(), fitted_values(), derivatives(), draw() and appraise() cover evaluation, prediction and diagnostics. The API reached its intended shape at 0.9.0, when every generated column was renamed to a dot-prefixed form, and 0.10.0 added conditional_values() for covariate-conditional prediction plots.

◆ Where it's heading

The package has moved through a long rewrite cycle and out the other side. Successive releases replaced evaluate_smooth() with smooth_estimates(), rebuilt draw() on top of it, then renamed the entire output vocabulary to avoid colliding with user variables. That work is finished; 0.11.1 is driven almost entirely by ggplot2 4.0.0 compatibility, with new mgcv family support for quantile residuals riding along. Development now tracks upstream breakage rather than internal redesign.

◆ Prediction

Expect the next releases to continue absorbing ggplot2 4.x and mgcv changes, with incremental family coverage in quantile_residuals() as the visible new work. The entries give no signal on which mgcv families come next.

R
reliagrowr
ANALYTICS
0.0

A reliability growth package put its models behind an MCP server for AI assistants to call.

◆ Current state

ReliaGrowR fits reliability growth models to failure data — Crow-AMSAA and Duane, with maximum likelihood estimation, confidence bounds, prediction, and reliability demonstration test planning. The last year widened it well past growth curves into repairable systems: parametric non-homogeneous Poisson process fitting with automatic change point detection, non-parametric mean cumulative function estimation, and system exposure calculation. The most recent release adds goodness-of-fit statistics and exposes the package's functions as Model Context Protocol tools.

◆ Where it's heading

Two arcs run in parallel. The statistical one is a steady march from plotting a growth curve to modelling recurrent failures properly — segmented NHPP models that detect their own change points, Nelson-Aalen estimation, Cramér-von Mises and Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistics for judging the fits. The interface one is newer and more unusual: the package now ships an MCP server, and its sibling plotting package followed with one two weeks later, so this is a deliberate direction across the maintainer's reliability suite rather than a single experiment. Naming and S3 conventions were cleaned up early, which is what made a uniform tool surface plausible later.

◆ Prediction

Given the sibling packages moved to MCP within weeks of each other, the remaining tools in the suite are the obvious next candidates; on the statistical side, goodness-of-fit having just arrived suggests model comparison and selection helpers are the natural follow-on.

Alternatives to gratia and reliagrowr

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either gratia or reliagrowr.

See all gratia alternatives → · See all reliagrowr alternatives →

Recent activity from gratia and reliagrowr

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 2mo agoreliagrowrReliability growth models exposed as MCP tools
  2. 4mo agoreliagrowrRepairable systems analysis arrives: NHPP, MCF, exposure
  3. 4mo agoreliagrowrMaximum likelihood fitting and failure simulation
  4. 8mo agoreliagrowrReliaGrowR 0.3.2
  5. 9mo agoreliagrowrMore plotting and printing options for RGA and Duane models
  6. 10mo agoreliagrowrS3 methods replace the ad hoc plotting functions
  7. 11mo agogratiaggplot2 4.0.0 compatibility, plus four more quantile-residual families
  8. 1y agogratiaconditional_values() replaces vis.gam for conditional prediction plots
  9. 2y agogratiaparametric_effects() joins the dot-prefix rename; LSS families begin
  10. 2y agogratiaEvery generated column gains a dot prefix
  11. 3y agogratiaReal variable names in smooth_samples(), plus dplyr 1.1.0 fixes
  12. 4y agogratiaM1 example output fixes and confint tibble returns

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between gratia and reliagrowr?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. gratia and reliagrowr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is gratia better than reliagrowr?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. gratia and reliagrowr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to gratia?

Top gratia alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "gratia alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/gratia for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to reliagrowr?

Top reliagrowr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "reliagrowr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/reliagrowr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.